M1 0W40 Q?'s

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 28, 2003
Messages
11,977
Location
Cajun Country, La.
I just recently had some M1 0W40 oil donated to me. I used it in an elderly residents Buick Regal and the engine seems to like it very much.
My friend did the oil change. He works for a local indy garage. We were talking about the M1 0W40 and how it might work in my trucks engine.
2007 F150, XL, 4.2 V6
Opinions?
 
If you have enough still left, go for it.

If you have to buy it, I'd suggest 5w30 instead. The 5-30's seem to be very well made and are well respected.

The 0W-40's are still voodoo to me. But that's just me ...
 
It isn't a bad choice but there's no need to go out of your way to obtain more if it is significantly more than what you currently run.

That 4.2 doesn't have any exotic specs so it is overkill for that application.
 
Originally Posted By: BrocLuno
If you have enough still left, go for it.

If you have to buy it, I'd suggest 5w30 instead. The 5-30's seem to be very well made and are well respected.

The 0W-40's are still voodoo to me. But that's just me ...

I only had 1-5 qt. container.
My friend and I were talking about this because the Ford Essex 4.2 was built/based upon the same engine platform design as was the Buick's 3.8 V6. The M1 0W40 seems to run very quiet in the Buick's V6. It was just a thought and I was just wanting to here opinions on it.
smile.gif
 
It's good stuff, but I would think there might be a small MPG hit. There's so many good inexpensive 5W20 oils now, MC, PYB, Valvoline, I would just keep on with 5W20 myself.
 
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.
 
Originally Posted By: Pontual
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.


A 0w-40 is still thicker than a 5w30 at almost all temps due to the higher hths. Only in extreme temps, -10F or lower does the 0w-40 become lighter at start up than a 5w30. FWIW

Heres a simple comparison:

Mobil 1 0w-40

Viscosity, cSt (ASTM D445) @ 40ºC 75
@ 100ºC 13.5
Viscosity Index 185
MRV at -40ºC, cP (ASTM D4684)
31,000
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.8

Total Base Number (ASTM D2896)
11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874)
1.3
Phosphorous, wt% (ASTM D4981)
0.1
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92)
230
Density @ 15.6ºC, g/ml (ASTM D4052)
0.85

Mobil 1 5w30

SAE Grade 5w30
Viscosity @ 100ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 11.0
Viscosity, @ 40ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 61.7
Viscosity Index 172
Sulfated Ash, wt%, (ASTM D874) 0.8
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.1

Pour Point, ºC (ASTM D97) -42
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 230
Density @15º C g/ml, (ASTM D4052) 0.855
 
Originally Posted By: volk06
Originally Posted By: Pontual
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.


A 0w-40 is still thicker than a 5w30 at almost all temps due to the higher hths. Only in extreme temps, -10F or lower does the 0w-40 become lighter at start up than a 5w30. FWIW

Heres a simple comparison:

Mobil 1 0w-40

Viscosity, cSt (ASTM D445) @ 40ºC 75
@ 100ºC 13.5
Viscosity Index 185
MRV at -40ºC, cP (ASTM D4684)
31,000
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.8

Total Base Number (ASTM D2896)
11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874)
1.3
Phosphorous, wt% (ASTM D4981)
0.1
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92)
230
Density @ 15.6ºC, g/ml (ASTM D4052)
0.85

Mobil 1 5w30

SAE Grade 5w30
Viscosity @ 100ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 11.0
Viscosity, @ 40ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 61.7
Viscosity Index 172
Sulfated Ash, wt%, (ASTM D874) 0.8
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.1

Pour Point, ºC (ASTM D97) -42
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 230
Density @15º C g/ml, (ASTM D4052) 0.855


The crossover is somewhere around -10 to -15C actually if you put any stock in the halving/doubling rule.
 
Originally Posted By: volk06
Originally Posted By: Pontual
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.


A 0w-40 is still thicker than a 5w30 at almost all temps due to the higher hths. Only in extreme temps, -10F or lower does the 0w-40 become lighter at start up than a 5w30. FWIW

Heres a simple comparison:

Mobil 1 0w-40

Viscosity, cSt (ASTM D445) @ 40ºC 75
@ 100ºC 13.5
Viscosity Index 185
MRV at -40ºC, cP (ASTM D4684)
31,000
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.8

Total Base Number (ASTM D2896)
11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874)
1.3
Phosphorous, wt% (ASTM D4981)
0.1
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92)
230
Density @ 15.6ºC, g/ml (ASTM D4052)
0.85

Mobil 1 5w30

SAE Grade 5w30
Viscosity @ 100ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 11.0
Viscosity, @ 40ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 61.7
Viscosity Index 172
Sulfated Ash, wt%, (ASTM D874) 0.8
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.1

Pour Point, ºC (ASTM D97) -42
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 230
Density @15º C g/ml, (ASTM D4052) 0.855


In the situation I commented, short trips in the end of the year there will be what 0C, in Northern Hemi, running like 1 to 4 miles, most of the time, the oil will be cool enough(below 40C), and the drag will be very similar. So 13.3 to 11cst will be a 10% viscosity difference, but at 40C, below 40C will be less and less.It will take a while to get over 40C, in winter, not in a short trip. Not water, but oil, will delay for the 0C to 40C. The drag difference would take like say 0.11hp with 0w40 and 0.10 hp with 5w30. Negligible. The AC robs much more powrr than that, even a headlight draggingbthe alternator robs more ... Dont need to be a F1 thinking, with a slow truck. Use a smaller spare tire and you compensate the oil drag.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Pontual
Originally Posted By: volk06
Originally Posted By: Pontual
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.


A 0w-40 is still thicker than a 5w30 at almost all temps due to the higher hths. Only in extreme temps, -10F or lower does the 0w-40 become lighter at start up than a 5w30. FWIW

Heres a simple comparison:

Mobil 1 0w-40

Viscosity, cSt (ASTM D445) @ 40ºC 75
@ 100ºC 13.5
Viscosity Index 185
MRV at -40ºC, cP (ASTM D4684)
31,000
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.8

Total Base Number (ASTM D2896)
11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874)
1.3
Phosphorous, wt% (ASTM D4981)
0.1
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92)
230
Density @ 15.6ºC, g/ml (ASTM D4052)
0.85

Mobil 1 5w30

SAE Grade 5w30
Viscosity @ 100ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 11.0
Viscosity, @ 40ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 61.7
Viscosity Index 172
Sulfated Ash, wt%, (ASTM D874) 0.8
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.1

Pour Point, ºC (ASTM D97) -42
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 230
Density @15º C g/ml, (ASTM D4052) 0.855


In the situation I commented, short trips in the end of the year there will be what 0C, in Northern Hemi, running like 1 to 4 miles, most of the time, the oil will be cool enough(below 40C), and the drag will be very similar. So 13.3 to 11cst will be a 10% viscosity difference, but at 40C, below 40C will be less and less.It will take a while to get over 40C, in winter, not in a short trip. Not water, but oil, will delay for the 0C to 40C. The drag difference would take like say 0.11hp with 0w40 and 0.10 hp with 5w30. Negligible. The AC robs much more powrr than that, even a headlight draggingbthe alternator robs more ... Dont need to be a F1 thinking, with a slow truck. Use a smaller spare tire and you compensate the oil drag.


You did not address the statement I was referring too. Your statement said 0w-40 is only thicker than 5w30 at temps above 210F and above. That simply is not true. You just bystepped that comment to a long winded explanation of why the rest of your statement was correct.

And no matter what, no matter how minuscule, thicker oil will always result in a little more drag that a more thin oil. So yes there will always be a little bit more internal drag with a thicker oil. Cant deny physics. Will this result in a MPG loss on a truck? No probably not.
 
Originally Posted By: volk06
You did not address the statement I was referring too. Your statement said 0w-40 is only thicker than 5w30 at temps above 210F and above. That simply is not true. You just bystepped that comment to a long winded explanation of why the rest of your statement was correct.

And no matter what, no matter how minuscule, thicker oil will always result in a little more drag that a more thin oil. Will this result in a MPG loss on a truck? No probably not.


That's how Ponty rolls...will start silly names and things next.

You often need a Rosetta stone (Rosetta being a Brazilian plane mechanic) to make sense.

But you are 100% correct, the 0W40 would have a negative (mostly tiny in this application) effect on fuel economy.
 
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
I used it in an elderly residents Buick Regal and the engine seems to like it very much.


Which Buick engine is that ?
 
Originally Posted By: Pontual
It will be thicker than 5w30 only above 210F and hiher temperatures. If you are short tripper, no noticeable fuel economy penalty. From freezing to 210F oil temp wont give more internal drag than 5w30.


Certainly not true since Mobil's published numbers show a higher viscosity for 0w-40 vs. 5w30 at both 100c (13.5 vs. 11.0) and 40c (75 vs. 61). By their own admission, at 212 deg F (100c) and at 104 deg F, the 0w-40 is considerably thicker. It therefore stands to reason it's thicker from 104-212 F.

I'd stick to the 5w30 or lighter weights in those V-6's.
 
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
I just recently had some M1 0W40 oil donated to me. I used it in an elderly residents Buick Regal and the engine seems to like it very much.
My friend did the oil change. He works for a local indy garage. We were talking about the M1 0W40 and how it might work in my trucks engine.
2007 F150, XL, 4.2 V6
Opinions?

There isn't any gasoline engine M1 0W-40 SN would work less than phenomenally well.
 
BOF if you run 0w40 the 5w20 police are gonna put a warrant out for you!

spankme2.gif


Seriously the M1 0w40 is good stuff and crazy popular around here for a reason but I would not go out and buy it for your truck IMO there are better choices for that application. But if you still have some by all means run it.
 
Originally Posted By: BrocLuno
If you have enough still left, go for it.

If you have to buy it, I'd suggest 5w30 instead. The 5-30's seem to be very well made and are well respected.

The 0W-40's are still voodoo to me. But that's just me ...


Haha same here. I just can't force myself to use a 0W oil in my car. Nissan says not to go below a 10W. I know 1996 was a long time ago,but I'm like you,0W oils seem like a no-no to me :P
 
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Haha same here. I just can't force myself to use a 0W oil in my car. Nissan says not to go below a 10W. I know 1996 was a long time ago,but I'm like you,0W oils seem like a no-no to me :P

Lol. That statement by Nissan is totally obsolete and irrelevant. It only applies to yesterday's conventional oils that sheared a lot.

It has been explained on BITOG many times that a synthetic 0W-x will perform no worse than a conventional 5W-x or 10W-x -- if not better. Therefore, there is no reason not to use a synthetic 0w30 or synthetic 5w30 when 10w30 is specified.

The only possible exception is 0W-20 in turbo applications. 0W-20 is exempt from some high-temperature-deposit tests of ILSAC/API that apply to turbo applications.
 
Originally Posted By: Merkava_4
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
I used it in an elderly residents Buick Regal and the engine seems to like it very much.


Which Buick engine is that ?

1990 Buick Regal 3.8 V6 AKA-3800
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom