Luvin' the MMO

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: tpitcher
How about rotating using MMO and not using MMO?

For instance, one tank of MMO, then around 2 tanks without MMO, then another tank of MMO - on and on...?
I tried that and the smoothness, and mileage increases return to normal. It's nest to put a dose in with each tank I have found.
 
Originally Posted By: StevieC
Originally Posted By: tpitcher
How about rotating using MMO and not using MMO?

For instance, one tank of MMO, then around 2 tanks without MMO, then another tank of MMO - on and on...?
I tried that and the smoothness, and mileage increases return to normal. It's nest to put a dose in with each tank I have found.



Stevie are you trying to say nest or best, was not sure if that nest word was a Canadian slang for something.
 
Originally Posted By: StevieC
Originally Posted By: tpitcher
How about rotating using MMO and not using MMO?

For instance, one tank of MMO, then around 2 tanks without MMO, then another tank of MMO - on and on...?
I tried that and the smoothness, and mileage increases return to normal. It's nest to put a dose in with each tank I have found.



The reason why I ask is that I'm treating tanks of gas in a Gal's car that I know.
 
Originally Posted By: c3po
Originally Posted By: StevieC
Originally Posted By: tpitcher
How about rotating using MMO and not using MMO?

For instance, one tank of MMO, then around 2 tanks without MMO, then another tank of MMO - on and on...?
I tried that and the smoothness, and mileage increases return to normal. It's nest to put a dose in with each tank I have found.



Stevie are you trying to say nest or best, was not sure if that nest word was a Canadian slang for something.


:lol: Ok you got me... BEST!!!!!
 
Originally Posted By: panthermike
Originally Posted By: panthermike
Originally Posted By: panthermike
Just filled up again today, consistent results so far. This is for the 2000 Corolla which only has a 3spd auto. Mixed driving.

Tank 1: 28.05

Tank 2: 31.8

Tank 3: 31.0

Still liking the MMO!


More consistency;

Tank 4: 31.2mpg, the car is running great!


Tank 5: 30.7mpg

Only got .5 decrease, which was surprising because much more city driving and some spirited driving as well.
thumbsup2.gif



Back up to 31.2mpg on the 6th tank. The numbers have been consistent w/ the exception of the very first tank. I will no doubt keep using the MMO. Before the MMO, the car would average around 29.5mpg on a regular basis, w/ the MMO right around 31.

I have to say I'm happy with this, again the car only has the 3spd auto and has 156K miles. A/C is always on.

Two thumbs up MMO!
 
I am thinking about trying MMO. Question: when calculating MPG while using MMO, does everyone take into account the amount of MMo added to the tank? In other words, MPG = Miles / (Gallons of gas + MMO)
 
Originally Posted By: Ursae_Majoris
Do not need to. By adding 4 oz of MMO, I am displacing 4 oz of gasoline, ie less gas fits in the tank.


I would not even know how to calculate 4 ounces out of 128 ounces which is a gallon, so too an answer your question, just like the above post, you do not need too.
 
Took apart a carb on a 12hp B&S today that was treated with MMO over the last couple weeks. Previously I couldn't clean all the varnish and junk that had accumulated from setting for 3 years. Today I was able clean it right off with just a rag... good stuff. Also used it on my door locks on the Ranger that doesn't want to work for month at a time. We'll see how it works over the long term.
 
OK a VOA on the MMO stuff came back and the results are not good in my mind.

I don't mean to put MMO down because as you can see from above I'm quite a fan, but there are some harmful chemicals in the sample that would cause catalytic converter damage if used for a prolonged period of time.

I don't want to discuss specifics but encourage you to do a VOA and see for yourself.

I know a few members on here have used it for quite a while without seeing any ill results so far and I too like what I have seen from my engine with it added to the fuel, but it IMO it is not a good idea to be adding to the fuel as a UCL.

Added to the oil should be fine so long as you aren't burning oil, but in the fuel IMO from the numbers and the chemicals used I would have to steer clear of continued use.

So with that said I'm I might go with a TCW3 and a fuel system cleaner that contains PEA to do an occasional cleaning.

Too bad, I was really starting to like the stuff.
frown.gif
 
PM,

I can't post it because I don't own the rights to it. I paid into it with a bunch of other members on Dyson's private "members only" blog and I'm not sure I'm allowed to share those results.

This is why I didn't post specifics, that and because I don't want to start a war on BITOG.

I will ask Terry for permission and if he says it's OK I will post it. If not then you will have to become a member to see it on his blog along with some other great stuff.

cheers3.gif


Steve
 
You ought to own the UOA/VOA if you paid for it. It is generally the "reading" that is proprietary.
 
I partially paid into it so it is a multi-owner situation with Terry footing most of the bill for it. So I would imagine he gets prime vote.

Take my word though... Not good as a UCL. Read into that what you will.
wink.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom