They obviously have mutual respect for each other - and with diversity in backgrounds - that’s a good relationship right thereGlad I don’t and won’t watch this person. Rather talk to David at HPL than him
Seems it would not be as useful for people doing 30k a year on the road … Neither is an exact science …"If high-temperature deposits are the concern, the 33C method remains the best choice. For lower temperature deposits that are more related to oxidation, the MHT method would be preferred for areas where volatiles are not likely to accumulate, and the Turbo method is preferred for areas where volatiles are more likely to be retained and participate in these undesirable reactions."
https://www.savantlab.com/testing-highlights/teost-turbo-test-method-evolution/
Might be in a turbo, but it doesn't appear it correlates well with certain high moly oils. However a specific moly.Seems it would not be as useful for people doing 30k a year on the road … Neither is an exact science …
True - yet, not that much moly in OEM approved lubes - so more a thing with boutiques - however - Amsoil seems to balance it all quite well …Might be in a turbo, but it doesn't appear it correlates well with certain high moly oils. However a specific moly.
They obviously have mutual respect for each other - and with diversity in backgrounds - that’s a good relationship right there
I meant zrod :/I know, makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing its in everything, my vg33, 2.7L ecoboost, 7.3 godzilla, looks like a clear winner for whatever you ask it to do, except I just remembered its not in anything, the shelby is running dominator 20w50![]()
Someone guessed $15k in the YT comments and Lake said that was pretty close.Maybe I missed it, but the number of full days it took to accomplish this, it would be interesting to see the total cost, oil, filters, dyno run time as well as oil analysis.
He's making plenty of coin off his YT channel, so it will be a business write-off because he spent money to make the video.Someone guessed $15k in the YT comments and Lake said that was pretty close.
He's making plenty of coin off his YT channel, so it will be a business write-off because he spent money to make the video.
It's only been up 9 days - so check back in a month or two for total views. And he makes all kinds of YT videos that generate income, and most of those probably don't cost him much to make besides his time. I said he's making money off his channel which has a good amount of videos, not that he'll make $15K+ on this specific video. Plus, nobody knows if there is some money involved through marketing, etc behind the scenes. I highly doubt he's losing any money overall with the channel, and making enough to be worth his time and efforts.There's no way he made $15k off 264k views(where the video is currently at.). No affiliate links, no sponsorships. Either he had entirely other reasons to make the content which paid for the video, or he lost money.
Not that many people care about motor oil.
Blasphemy! You said this on a forum all about motor oil?Not that many people care about motor oil.
He promotes used oil analysis. Even though he says to pick a lab and stick with it for trend analysis, SpeeDiagnostix is used throughout his videos. Almost like watching a late-night infomercial.It's only been up 9 days - so check back in a month or two for total views. And he makes all kinds of YT videos that generate income, and most of those don't cost him much to make. I said he's making money off his channel which has a good amount of videos, not that he'll make $15K+ on this specific video.
Since he founded and owns SPEEDiagnostix, that's no shocker.He promotes used oil analysis. Even though he says to pick a lab and stick with it for trend analysis, SpeeDiagnostix is used throughout his videos. Almost like watching a late-night infomercial.
Right but again that points to the use case matters. With or without FCP I don't care about cost when I'm asking or looking for what's best. What's best is what's best. Not "This would be best but it's XXXX dollars". Things go on sale, there's deals, there's FCP, there's always something. Again we're talking a tank of gas cost between walmart supertech and amsoil/redline. Everyone's use case is their own but to me that doesn't matter. I want to know what protects my engine the most for a harsh environment. If I take the Grenadier to Moab or sink it in a water crossing, which I did and just got it back after 8 months of service work, I want what's going to get me from start to finish, not 10k or 15k miles. But that's my use case and it might be ridiculous to others. The amount of finger pointing and nose snubbing at LSJR here is a bit nonsense because those doing so seem to always have their reasons but nothing that's actually valid as a whole.Wow, 20 pages. I haven't kept up but with regard to this thought process, I believe this is what @TiGeo was alluding to. First, some DO consider the cost of oil to be important. FCP allows an LM user to lower the overall cost of an oil that some consider overpriced for what it is. Second, shear IS important to those that have fuel dilution or an engine that is hard on an oil, in order to maintain a modicum of film thickness. Which seems to be quite few European ones. Start with a 30wt. that can shear out of grade quickly, then throw on additional degradation with added fuel? Can seriously lower protection even if OCIs are shortened. So yeah, a good majority of use cases are focused on this and numbers CAN matter.
So a guy that designs oils doing test in a lab with other guys that design and test oils doesn't yield any meaningful data. What does? Where does your minor in chemistry fit? You always mention what's meaningful but when I ask what you'll accept you never have a response. You were even critical when he was with the Valvoline guys that designed Valvoline's oil. Who's poster is hanging on your wall that you dream about then?Learn up on what actually constitutes a valid test yielding meaningful data and we'll discuss it later. You've got a ways to go on that.