Maybe we need a valvoline restore and protect -turbo formula. The first oil formulated to remove those pesky MoDTC deposits in turbos left behind by HPL and redline
well this is about due, how surprising.I'd love to see ESP tested.
Why not? Very well respected, and more popular/used than some of the others he tested.well this is about due, how surprising.
personally I like to think outside of the box,,,,,,,,THERE are many good oils on the market other than MOBIL.Why not? Very well respected, and more popular/used than some of the others he tested.
2024 BITOG "post your latest oil change" totals:personally I like to think outside of the box,,,,,,,,THERE are many good oils on the market other than MOBIL.
OK. Mobil is a sales leader used by a lot of people, including myself so that my reason.personally I like to think outside of the box,,,,,,,,THERE are many good oils on the market other than MOBIL.
Your Outback is the perfect vehicle to change your mind on that notion.I fully believe that most people could run nothing but SuperTech/Kirkland synthetic, change it every 3-5k miles and use good filters, . . . . if their car failed before 250K miles, it won't be because they used the wrong oil.
What are you running in each now?Im thrilled so many products are available for me to use.
Basic approvals didnt keep my J35 clean.
Boutique stuff does.
My Titan chews oil down like a puppy at the Sunday Times.
I can target this problem with specific oil now.
Yes, I have read about Glenda's experience with the Outback. So far, mine isn't burning any oil. I like the Amsoil for a lot of reasons, but really feel good about longer OCIs (like yearly) with it. I really like everything I've read and heard about Valvoline Restore and Protect as well, and while all of the hype is over it's ability to RESTORE, I suspect it can PROTECT pretty good as well, just not for as long as Amsoil. I agree, either would be excellent lifetime choices.Your Outback is the perfect vehicle to change your mind on that notion.
Give this a read
AMSOIL Signature Series is a smart move in that vehicle and Valvoline Restore and Protect in your others. Valvoline Restore and Protect could also be a lifetime oil choice in the Outback.
What are you running in each now?
Great example of how "any quality synthetic changed every 5k is fine" doesn't work for everyone. It works for many, which is why it's so often repeated here, but not all.
Great testimonial related to your experiences related to your vehicles.HPL liberated carbon that should not have been there to begin with running SN and SN+ high quality off the shelf oils. (PP, M1, Valvoline, Idemitsu)
I wasn't a 5K changer I went by the Honda MM which ranged from 6K to 9K, and a flat 7500 in the Titan which isn't forming carbon but will shear out of grade within the OCI.
I cut every filter and the evidence was right in front of my face as well as posted here.
If I had to do it over again I would’ve done 10k oci’s(maybe longer) with AMSOIL Signature Series and avoided piston deposits and saved time and money. In the meantime the ESP test continues!Yes, I have read about Glenda's experience with the Outback. So far, mine isn't burning any oil. I like the Amsoil for a lot of reasons, but really feel good about longer OCIs (like yearly) with it. I really like everything I've read and heard about Valvoline Restore and Protect as well, and while all of the hype is over it's ability to RESTORE, I suspect it can PROTECT pretty good as well, just not for as long as Amsoil. I agree, either would be excellent lifetime choices.
Great testimonial related to your experiences related to your vehicles.
Are you still following the Honda MM? The lowest I've gone was 50% (5.6k miles) running AMSOIL Signature Series. The filter had more carbon than I've seen in one, and this last oil change was at 10k total miles on the 2025 Pilot. Seriously concerned with the overall amount of carbon so early in this J35Y8's life.
I’d say the wear metal test is pretty decent for determining wear metalsHow are you determining “less wear” - because if it’s Project Farm methodology - I am not sure you achieved valid results. The one arm bandit test is meaningless, and yet, he employs that kind of testing.
I’ll trust Lake Speed Jr. a lot more than Project Farm, who destroys tools in the name of “testing” even though the destruction has little to do with tool performance and design, and more to do with gratifying his audience.
It’s not a religion so belief isn’t a real factor. So long as the same same testing method is used across the board the end result is still valid.Who do you believe their tests are more accurate, Blackstone or Polaris Labs? Or are they the same in your eyes?
The only way someone can be correct is faulty data? Real world usage produces no results for you?If they did it was because of faulty data, their “tests” did nothing to gain actual and relevant data.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.