Try some, see how it likes it.I am still learning a lot and I find LSJ helpful. From my perspective, regarding General Motors, their Chief Engineer for the 2.7 Turbo Kevin Luchansky has stated publicly that the L3B engine was designed with 0w20 in mind but then they upped the spec to 5w30 for better wear protection and durability.
GM already has 0w40 spec for the performance V8 models with allowances to go to a 5w50. Now with GM virtually confirming it doesn't matter what grade oil you put in your car, I'm wondering if it would be worth the slight additional cost of "upgrading" the oil in my truck from a 5w30 to a 0w40/5w40.
My thinking is that the 5w30 is probably fine but then again I was also one of the ones that believed that you should always stick to manufacturers recommend grade or you will damage your engine.
Maybe... for some or a lot of engines... it just doesn't matterAnybody concerned with what weight Xw-XX should be checking the PDS's for actual cSt. You'd be surprised how loosely the weight scale is used.
PF's a clown. His oil tests have no technical merit whatsoever.LSJ gets "criticized" while PF is hated.
Plus the fact that HT/HS is a better metric, backed up by an approval that requires a specific minimum. Oils aren’t “weights”.Anybody concerned with what weight Xw-XX should be checking the PDS's for actual cSt. You'd be surprised how loosely the weight scale is used.
dnewton3 said:I watched a new YT video last night from "I Do Cars" regarding an L87 engine that precedes the recall range, but has the exact same issue. The engine had nearly cooked one of the crank/rod journals to a crispy black; clearly a lack of "lubrication" to some degree.
Note: cannot link the video here due to embedded profanity.
He called into question the range of the recall (maybe should be larger?), as well as why some other platforms don't seem to have the problems even though they are of the same displacement (Camaro and 'Vette) and timeframe. Further, many engines have used the same con-rod bearings for several iterations of engines with no problems, so it cannot be the bearings themselves. He alluded to the fact that it might be a manufacturing issue with the crank and not a design issue, but had no proof; only conjecture. If so, I don't see how a thicker oil is going to stop these failures, though it may delay them outside of warranty.
As time goes on, I think we'll see little parts of evidence start to amalgamate into the full story, but it will take time.
The following are direct quotes from this video:The issue I have with many of LSJr's videos is that he does what most folks do ... paints with a really broad brush. The generalizations he makes can be very misleading to the uninformed.
As with most things in life, viscosity isn't a one-size fits all answer.
Interesting I didn't hear that.I am still learning a lot and I find LSJ helpful. From my perspective, regarding General Motors, their Chief Engineer for the 2.7 Turbo Kevin Luchansky has stated publicly that the L3B engine was designed with 0w20 in mind but then they upped the spec to 5w30 for better wear protection and durability.
He does not promote them as "technical".PF's a clown. His oil tests have no technical merit whatsoever.
PF shows you his methodology and shows you his data. The viewer is free to make their own conclusions.He does not promote them as "technical".
He stays in his lane. He even tell the viewer all he is presenting is a garage bench observation. I appreciate his candor, that some other YT notables lack.
Hardly a clown. A lot of his testing is v. good.PF's a clown. His oil tests have no technical merit whatsoever.
I agree. I'm not going to say anymore what irritates me about each, beat to death.Hardly a clown. A lot of his testing is v. good.
I know at GM there was a product plan in place to essentially go 100% battery electric (obviously political and customer preference has changed this).Manufacturing is difficult from engines to aerospace hardware things happen. Only thing you can do is learn and move forward. Toyota and GM are both claiming mfg issues leading to failure, now if that's a cover story I think that can be debated.
Is this factually true? Loss of brain power?I know at GM there was a product plan in place to essentially go 100% battery electric (obviously political and customer preference has changed this).
So the handwriting was on the wall for engineering and manufacturing folks with powertrain experience in combustion engines and transmissions.
They lost a lot of expertise and experience to retirements and surplusing. Throw in Covid with work from home or don't work at all.
I think it's shown up in product issues on the engine and transmission side.
I have a 02 4.8 in my 82 GMC and it likes anything 5w30. Doesn’t burn a drop of oil or leak anything. I have a Gen 4 4.8 to put in my other one.Definitely dated, but my 2000 Silverado 4.8 Pushrod V8 was very happy on VWB 5W30 and 5k mile OCIs.
Zero oil consumption and smooth performance for 300k miles.
Always scrutinize your engine design and driving conditions.