Japan taking over the motorcycle industry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


CBX
A lot of the 750cc were 4000.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: bigdreama
Ride what you like.

All bikes are compromised from an engineering standpoint. I like BMW's with all of their well documented flaws and my wife likes Harleys which is why an Electra Glide resides in our garage.

Why can't we just ride what we like and accept what others ride without criticism?


No, not "all bikes" are compromised. Some bikes really ARE well-engineered and well-built!
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: bigdreama
Ride what you like.

All bikes are compromised from an engineering standpoint. I like BMW's with all of their well documented flaws and my wife likes Harleys which is why an Electra Glide resides in our garage.

Why can't we just ride what we like and accept what others ride without criticism?


This thread is no different than any of the others when you have people who like metric rides and those who like Harleys. They don't start out with the intention of belittling anyone's choice of motorcycles, but they always end up that way. The problem is, people take ANY criticism of their chosen brand as a personal attack, when most of the time the criticisms are just stated facts. I don't know why people take these things personally. Did we design and build the bikes we ride? No, we are simply consumers, so why take the criticism personally? Every man-made product has flaws, and motorcycles are no exception to that rule. I ride a Triumph. Is it perfect? Of course not, and if someone points out its flaws, I'm not going to pitch a hissy fit about it, nor am I going to take it personally. Why should I? I didn't design or build the bike. It is what it is, but unfortunately, some people just simply cannot accept the bike they chose to buy has any flaws, and if you point them out, you're labeled as a bad person, or a "basher" for doing so...


You'll keep riding your Harley until the cheap, plastic chain guide goes and launches your engine, or the stator that's buried in the hottest part of the engine goes out, or one of the other many bad designs fails...

Sounds like you are the one hating Harley's. I own Harley's and Metrics. You are the person you [censored] about. You don't take criticism. You make up facts and name call when you are called out. I have put 20k problem free miles on Harley's in the last two years. We leave in June from Florida to Canada and I bet we have no problems. Ride more and [censored] less.


Actually, no, he is 100% right: the Twin Cam has MANY serious design flaws, including but not limited to a terrible primary chain tensioner design, a hot-running stator, a dreadful cam chain setup (that can grenade the engine without warning), and a cockamamie setup that requires major disassembly to replace the drive belt. They run so hot that there is a pending class-action lawsuit from riders that have been burned (one dude had his chaps catch fire!) Higher-power TCs are running right at (or over) the transmission design capacity, leading to 5th gear bearing failures.

Something as simple as a CLUTCH CABLE requires removing the exhaust pipes, right floorboard, and drain the transmission!

Note that the Evolution 1200 in the Sportster has NONE of these problems.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


Yeah really, I've never heard of any metric that requires that...


Old Rebel or Nighthawk, maybe? I've seen some short intervals...but not THAT short. (An older Burgman 400 was, IIRC, 3500 miles!)

Of course, my wife's Honda has NO valve adjustment interval.
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


CBX
A lot of the 750cc were 4000.


Well, according to the shop manual I have for the CBX, the valve clearance inspection interval was every 3750 miles. According to friends that have been M/C Techs for years, they held their clearance pretty well.

But, the CBX also came out 37 years ago. Valve clearance inspection intervals have increased dramatically since then. Even at the extended VCI intervals common today, the need to actually adjust the valve clearance is rare.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: bigdreama
Ride what you like.

All bikes are compromised from an engineering standpoint. I like BMW's with all of their well documented flaws and my wife likes Harleys which is why an Electra Glide resides in our garage.

Why can't we just ride what we like and accept what others ride without criticism?


This thread is no different than any of the others when you have people who like metric rides and those who like Harleys. They don't start out with the intention of belittling anyone's choice of motorcycles, but they always end up that way. The problem is, people take ANY criticism of their chosen brand as a personal attack, when most of the time the criticisms are just stated facts. I don't know why people take these things personally. Did we design and build the bikes we ride? No, we are simply consumers, so why take the criticism personally? Every man-made product has flaws, and motorcycles are no exception to that rule. I ride a Triumph. Is it perfect? Of course not, and if someone points out its flaws, I'm not going to pitch a hissy fit about it, nor am I going to take it personally. Why should I? I didn't design or build the bike. It is what it is, but unfortunately, some people just simply cannot accept the bike they chose to buy has any flaws, and if you point them out, you're labeled as a bad person, or a "basher" for doing so...


Your problem Grampi is you have no idea what you are talking about. You have never owned a late model Harley, you have no interest in owning a Harley, yet you profess to be an expert on Harleys.

Your the FIRST and FOREMOST BASHER in these forums of, you guessed it, Harleys.
Yet, you have no idea what you are talking about, you didnt even know you could buy a Road King or Touring Harley for less then 30 to $35,000 dollars, It took me PAGES in this forum to prove you wrong.

THen you go to, OF ALL PLACES, YOU TUBE and present Harley youtube video issues as facts! MY GOD, how unscientific! Going to youtube for people who made videos of problem with their bikes, out of HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of motorcycles, you find the ones with problems which ALL brands have. Ha!

Hey, Grampi, why dont you publish the links of ALL bikes on youtube with issues, every single maker of every automobile and motorcycle has youtube videos of the issues. But you only chose Harley. Not the other half dozen brands we speak of in here. You profess yourself to be the official word on Harley and claim what you present are facts. Ha!

Yet, when a REAL INDEPENDANT TRUE, factual study by and independent PROFESSIONAL survey group is done, you CHOSE to IGNORE IT.

Why is that? WHY DO YOU NOT PUBLISH the facts of a Consumer Report survey done about 2 years ago (tops) on motorcycle cycles? Why? I ll tell you why, because BMW was number ONE and HARLEY WAS NUMBER TWO when asked if they would buy another of the same brand. THe Japanese metrics were at the bottom of the list, with Yamaha in last place or second to last.

Where it came to service calls, BMW and Harley has the most, Yamaha the least, but Consumer Reports stated the repairs were NOT major repairs involving drivetrain trans etc, that would make sense with all the options on some of these bikes, electrical etc... more options will have more issues.

SO what happens when Grampi finds out these FACTS, he posts youtube videos, completely ignoring and not commenting on the fact that buyers of BMW and Harleys were most likely to buy another and the metric brands at the BOTTOM of the list when asked if they would buy the same brands again.
Whats Grampi's response, another one if his scientific statements, Harley riders are brainwashed.

Here are some more facts, dealing with some recent posts of the last 2 pages and why I bought my Road King for 20k NOT the 30 to 35 you were stating.
1. FIT< FINISH< QUALITY OF PARTS< PAINTS AN,METALS AND PLASTICS are far superior, bar none.
2. ABS BRAKES ROCK SOLID BRAKING AND HANDLING is simply amazing.
3. SIX SPEED TRANSMISSION
4. NO VALVE ADJUSTMENT on my Harley, most metrics need an adjustment as part of the 600 mile check, then additional checks at anywhere from every 4000 miles to 16000 miles. I did my own on my metrics, they are a pain in the [censored] to do. No need for my Harley, that saves a few hundred right there every time.
5. Tires that last for 14,000 miles give or take 2,000. My metrics ALWAYS needed a new rear tire every 6 to 8000 miles.
6 THe Rushmore Road King Rock, rock solid handling, cruise all day long on the interstate without the bike sounding like a bucket of bolts, silky smooth and quiet.
I owned a Suzuki c50 and Yamaha 1300 tourer. Both great bikes, but the Road King is the king over those bikes, not even close and YES, it should be, you pay for it, but you GET IT.
7. Standard cruise control
8. Engine doesnt share oil with the transmission and primary.
Sadly you will never be able to make a knowledgeable comment on Harley, because you do NOT OWN ONE. SO THEREFOR YOU WILL NEVER KNOW WHY AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY LIKE CONSUMERS REPORTS STATES BMW AND HARLEY AS THE TOP OF OWNER SATISFACTION.
Instead you will pour though the internet trying to find the unhappy people out of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF BIKE OWNERS, then post it on the internet and paint all the bikes as having issues as fact, when I can do the very same thing on any brands.
9. You will go and trash air cooling on Harleys but ignore the FACT that many metrics and Polaris/Indian/Victory do the same. Heck the new Harley touring bikes have oil coolers and some water cooled. ALL YAMAHAs large cruisers are air cooled, even though they are just about completely fully pulled out of the market now, unable to compete.
 
Last edited:
Ps Grampi,
I keep saying it but done responding so if you do reply dont take my silence as an endorsement of whatever it is you are saying.
I just never understood why people are so hung up and jaded on different brands of motorcycles, NO MATTER THE BRAND, so much so they preach to others what is good and bad, even when they dont own one.
Heck, if I had the money and the years left in my life, I want to own at least another 4 different brands of bikes, all for their own unique reason.
 
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
02SE said:
dr2152 said:
Well, according to the shop manual I have for the CBX, the valve clearance inspection interval was every 3750 miles. According to friends that have been M/C Techs for years, they held their clearance pretty well.

But, the CBX also came out 37 years ago. Valve clearance inspection intervals have increased dramatically since then. Even at the extended VCI intervals common today, the need to actually adjust the valve clearance is rare.


True, Valve check intervals have been greatly extended on most but not all bikes by any means in the metric market. Dealers and others will say things like you dont have to do the factory required 600 mile check, then after that, some might say, just check at 8,000 miles and your good to go for X amount of miles.
Thing is, your making a decision to ignore what the engine maker requires. If one is good with that, that is fine but there is a reason and the reason is, a few engines will be greatly out of spec and burn an exhaust valve, if the check isnt done, the maker can blame you for not doing it.
I personally dont think its a big deal but I stick to the manual and I am VERY relieved I no longer have to do valve checks.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


CBX
A lot of the 750cc were 4000.


Well, according to the shop manual I have for the CBX, the valve clearance inspection interval was every 3750 miles. According to friends that have been M/C Techs for years, they held their clearance pretty well.

But, the CBX also came out 37 years ago. Valve clearance inspection intervals have increased dramatically since then. Even at the extended VCI intervals common today, the need to actually adjust the valve clearance is rare.


Mine were recommended every 2000 miles as the factory specs had a wide variance. When I got mine they were on the very tight side. They are on the loose side now. The service invoices I got with the bike showed some shims were replaced at each inspection. It has 12k on it so I will wait until 16 to check again. Most of my CB or CBR I set on the loose side. The CBR was every 16k and a good 4+ hour job. The CBX is full day or more.


My point to Grampi was that just because it was metric didn't make it better. Anyone (Grampi) can pick and choose their facts to make a point. He loves (lives?) to bash Harley's. We could do that with his Triumph but we don't. I started working on bikes in 1969 and have owned 30+ bikes. The new models are better than the older ones but sometimes harder to work on.
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


CBX
A lot of the 750cc were 4000.


Are there any metrics made within the last 30 years that require frequent valve adjustments? It's funny you had to refer to a metric bike that's over 30 years old to compare your Harley favorably to...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: alarmguy
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: bigdreama
Ride what you like.

All bikes are compromised from an engineering standpoint. I like BMW's with all of their well documented flaws and my wife likes Harleys which is why an Electra Glide resides in our garage.

Why can't we just ride what we like and accept what others ride without criticism?


This thread is no different than any of the others when you have people who like metric rides and those who like Harleys. They don't start out with the intention of belittling anyone's choice of motorcycles, but they always end up that way. The problem is, people take ANY criticism of their chosen brand as a personal attack, when most of the time the criticisms are just stated facts. I don't know why people take these things personally. Did we design and build the bikes we ride? No, we are simply consumers, so why take the criticism personally? Every man-made product has flaws, and motorcycles are no exception to that rule. I ride a Triumph. Is it perfect? Of course not, and if someone points out its flaws, I'm not going to pitch a hissy fit about it, nor am I going to take it personally. Why should I? I didn't design or build the bike. It is what it is, but unfortunately, some people just simply cannot accept the bike they chose to buy has any flaws, and if you point them out, you're labeled as a bad person, or a "basher" for doing so...


Your problem Grampi is you have no idea what you are talking about. You have never owned a late model Harley, you have no interest in owning a Harley, yet you profess to be an expert on Harleys.

Your the FIRST and FOREMOST BASHER in these forums of, you guessed it, Harleys.
Yet, you have no idea what you are talking about, you didnt even know you could buy a Road King or Touring Harley for less then 30 to $35,000 dollars, It took me PAGES in this forum to prove you wrong.

THen you go to, OF ALL PLACES, YOU TUBE and present Harley youtube video issues as facts! MY GOD, how unscientific! Going to youtube for people who made videos of problem with their bikes, out of HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of motorcycles, you find the ones with problems which ALL brands have. Ha!

Hey, Grampi, why dont you publish the links of ALL bikes on youtube with issues, every single maker of every automobile and motorcycle has youtube videos of the issues. But you only chose Harley. Not the other half dozen brands we speak of in here. You profess yourself to be the official word on Harley and claim what you present are facts. Ha!

Yet, when a REAL INDEPENDANT TRUE, factual study by and independent PROFESSIONAL survey group is done, you CHOSE to IGNORE IT.

Why is that? WHY DO YOU NOT PUBLISH the facts of a Consumer Report survey done about 2 years ago (tops) on motorcycle cycles? Why? I ll tell you why, because BMW was number ONE and HARLEY WAS NUMBER TWO when asked if they would buy another of the same brand. THe Japanese metrics were at the bottom of the list, with Yamaha in last place or second to last.

Where it came to service calls, BMW and Harley has the most, Yamaha the least, but Consumer Reports stated the repairs were NOT major repairs involving drivetrain trans etc, that would make sense with all the options on some of these bikes, electrical etc... more options will have more issues.

SO what happens when Grampi finds out these FACTS, he posts youtube videos, completely ignoring and not commenting on the fact that buyers of BMW and Harleys were most likely to buy another and the metric brands at the BOTTOM of the list when asked if they would buy the same brands again.
Whats Grampi's response, another one if his scientific statements, Harley riders are brainwashed.

Here are some more facts, dealing with some recent posts of the last 2 pages and why I bought my Road King for 20k NOT the 30 to 35 you were stating.
1. FIT< FINISH< QUALITY OF PARTS< PAINTS AN,METALS AND PLASTICS are far superior, bar none.
2. ABS BRAKES ROCK SOLID BRAKING AND HANDLING is simply amazing.
3. SIX SPEED TRANSMISSION
4. NO VALVE ADJUSTMENT on my Harley, most metrics need an adjustment as part of the 600 mile check, then additional checks at anywhere from every 4000 miles to 16000 miles. I did my own on my metrics, they are a pain in the [censored] to do. No need for my Harley, that saves a few hundred right there every time.
5. Tires that last for 14,000 miles give or take 2,000. My metrics ALWAYS needed a new rear tire every 6 to 8000 miles.
6 THe Rushmore Road King Rock, rock solid handling, cruise all day long on the interstate without the bike sounding like a bucket of bolts, silky smooth and quiet.
I owned a Suzuki c50 and Yamaha 1300 tourer. Both great bikes, but the Road King is the king over those bikes, not even close and YES, it should be, you pay for it, but you GET IT.
7. Standard cruise control
8. Engine doesnt share oil with the transmission and primary.
Sadly you will never be able to make a knowledgeable comment on Harley, because you do NOT OWN ONE. SO THEREFOR YOU WILL NEVER KNOW WHY AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY LIKE CONSUMERS REPORTS STATES BMW AND HARLEY AS THE TOP OF OWNER SATISFACTION.
Instead you will pour though the internet trying to find the unhappy people out of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF BIKE OWNERS, then post it on the internet and paint all the bikes as having issues as fact, when I can do the very same thing on any brands.
9. You will go and trash air cooling on Harleys but ignore the FACT that many metrics and Polaris/Indian/Victory do the same. Heck the new Harley touring bikes have oil coolers and some water cooled. ALL YAMAHAs large cruisers are air cooled, even though they are just about completely fully pulled out of the market now, unable to compete.


You are correct. I've never owned a Harley, but I can read. I will issue the same challenge to you as I did to dr2152...prove that anything I've said isn't true. But you aren't going to just like dr2152 hasn't because everything I've posted is absolutely true.
 
Originally Posted By: Jarlaxle
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: bigdreama
Ride what you like.

All bikes are compromised from an engineering standpoint. I like BMW's with all of their well documented flaws and my wife likes Harleys which is why an Electra Glide resides in our garage.

Why can't we just ride what we like and accept what others ride without criticism?


This thread is no different than any of the others when you have people who like metric rides and those who like Harleys. They don't start out with the intention of belittling anyone's choice of motorcycles, but they always end up that way. The problem is, people take ANY criticism of their chosen brand as a personal attack, when most of the time the criticisms are just stated facts. I don't know why people take these things personally. Did we design and build the bikes we ride? No, we are simply consumers, so why take the criticism personally? Every man-made product has flaws, and motorcycles are no exception to that rule. I ride a Triumph. Is it perfect? Of course not, and if someone points out its flaws, I'm not going to pitch a hissy fit about it, nor am I going to take it personally. Why should I? I didn't design or build the bike. It is what it is, but unfortunately, some people just simply cannot accept the bike they chose to buy has any flaws, and if you point them out, you're labeled as a bad person, or a "basher" for doing so...


You'll keep riding your Harley until the cheap, plastic chain guide goes and launches your engine, or the stator that's buried in the hottest part of the engine goes out, or one of the other many bad designs fails...

Sounds like you are the one hating Harley's. I own Harley's and Metrics. You are the person you [censored] about. You don't take criticism. You make up facts and name call when you are called out. I have put 20k problem free miles on Harley's in the last two years. We leave in June from Florida to Canada and I bet we have no problems. Ride more and [censored] less.


Actually, no, he is 100% right: the Twin Cam has MANY serious design flaws, including but not limited to a terrible primary chain tensioner design, a hot-running stator, a dreadful cam chain setup (that can grenade the engine without warning), and a cockamamie setup that requires major disassembly to replace the drive belt. They run so hot that there is a pending class-action lawsuit from riders that have been burned (one dude had his chaps catch fire!) Higher-power TCs are running right at (or over) the transmission design capacity, leading to 5th gear bearing failures.

Something as simple as a CLUTCH CABLE requires removing the exhaust pipes, right floorboard, and drain the transmission!

Note that the Evolution 1200 in the Sportster has NONE of these problems.


You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink it...especially when their favorite drink is Kool-Aid...
 
i am pretty sure the YouTube victory pointers on HD problem are accurate .the web is full of people that had those exact issue ,that dealer rent HD so he should know since he has to fix those renter .but lets assume you are right and he exagerate. very easy to test the oil pump pressure drop when engine is hot. leaky HD ,search the web countless people have had those issue! the insanity of needing a belt drive changed on a HD .yep very easy to see you dont even need to be a mechanic.is the victory perfect? come on give me a break its a freaking V engine one of the most break prone engine on the planet. i just surprised the industry dont just use a single piston with a huge turbo lol.but as V engine goes .HD is not the motorcycle you want if you plan to do high millage . if you do only 1000 mile a year? ya fine go buy one!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: 02SE
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Want to help me adjust the valves on the Honda? That's a great design that takes hours every 2,000 miles. So using your facts on a 4k mile trip I would have to stop and work on the Honda but the Harley I just keep riding. Which is the better design?



Which Honda has a valve adjustment interval of every 2k miles?


CBX
A lot of the 750cc were 4000.


Are there any metrics made within the last 30 years that require frequent valve adjustments? It's funny you had to refer to a metric bike that's over 30 years old to compare your Harley favorably to...


You pick Harley so called facts that are 10-15 years old. (Cam tensioner) I wrote about a bike I own. My CBR would have to be adjusted every year vs the Harley. Those are facts. The new CB1100 is every 8000 miles. So in 46 years Honda has went from 4000 to 8000 miles on valve adjustment on the straight four. I love the new CB1100. But it is high maintenance. No one can dispute your Harley facts because they are not real.
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
You pick Harley so called facts that are 10-15 years old. (Cam tensioner) I wrote about a bike I own. My CBR would have to be adjusted every year vs the Harley. Those are facts. The new CB1100 is every 8000 miles. So in 46 years Honda has went from 4000 to 8000 miles on valve adjustment on the straight four. I love the new CB1100. But it is high maintenance. No one can dispute your Harley facts because they are not real.


Sorry, but you're wrong again. These problems exist even with the newer Harleys.
 
Twin Cam Harley cam chain tensioner (and primary chain tensioner) problems continue to this day, and will until the engine is substantially redesigned.
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: dr2152
You pick Harley so called facts that are 10-15 years old. (Cam tensioner) I wrote about a bike I own. My CBR would have to be adjusted every year vs the Harley. Those are facts. The new CB1100 is every 8000 miles. So in 46 years Honda has went from 4000 to 8000 miles on valve adjustment on the straight four. I love the new CB1100. But it is high maintenance. No one can dispute your Harley facts because they are not real.


Sorry, but you're wrong again. These problems exist even with the newer Harleys.


Got something to prove this? It was 1999 to 2006. My 04 was fine at 60k. They was still good last year when the new owner checked them.
 
No, he can't prove it, there are no facts and figures, sure, sooner or later a tensioner will have to be replaced. It's a wearable part but not anywhere near the required maintenance of doing valve checks on a metric.
The valve checks are provable one just needs to look in the service manuals of the bikes. Again a maintainance item that will cost more time and/or money over the life of the bike then replacing a tensioner every 50,75 or 100 k miles.
I'm sure many more bikes have been damaged by burnt valves then tensioner failures, but, not prove able either.
 
Originally Posted By: dr2152
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: dr2152
You pick Harley so called facts that are 10-15 years old. (Cam tensioner) I wrote about a bike I own. My CBR would have to be adjusted every year vs the Harley. Those are facts. The new CB1100 is every 8000 miles. So in 46 years Honda has went from 4000 to 8000 miles on valve adjustment on the straight four. I love the new CB1100. But it is high maintenance. No one can dispute your Harley facts because they are not real.


Sorry, but you're wrong again. These problems exist even with the newer Harleys.


Got something to prove this? It was 1999 to 2006. My 04 was fine at 60k. They was still good last year when the new owner checked them.


Sure, just keep riding your Harley without doing anything to the chain tensioner and when the engine grenades, you'll know what we're talking about...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom