Is BITOG an endangered species?

has this planet enough litium, co cover every demand? im pesimist.
what we need is cheap h2 production & storage -> game over tesla.
Which is thermodynamically difficult to say the least considering there are no free sources. What favorable pathway are you using to get this hydrogen?

But of course that’s only half the problem. The other half is the abysmal energy density and the issues with storage and distribution.
 
back then all we had was nife, nimh, pb batteries. bulky stuff.
see today... ;)
i´m afraid there´s not enough li for everybody. even less so if long range ev should come to market en masse.
right now everybody is covering eyes (child labor,etc), when we need loads of li.
 
Yes tesla uses lubrication in their motors, they use dexron 6 I believe or pentosin
 
People, especially young people, want Teslas. The demand is insane. If and when they deliver the Model 2 ($30K) it will be game over.
Jeff - I want a Tesla.

Problem is, that would bring me up to 9 cars. And right now, there isn’t a Tesla (or any other EV) that could adequately replace any of my cars. Nine seems a bit much.

Closest to the S600 is the Model S, the one with the big battery and dual motors.

But not only do I lose the sound of the V-12 but I lose the range.

Example: last week, I drove back from college graduation in Connecticut via Maryland (to drop off my mom) - a 500+ Mile trip. No range worries.

If I can’t replace one of my cars with an EV - they make no sense for me.
 
Let me say up front, I know very, very little about Electric Vehicles (EV) from a mechanical standpoint...

...Does a Tesla need any type of lubrication? Maybe some 90wt in a differential.... possibly?...

...What you think....???? Is BITOG quickly on its way to being a dead forum, because everyone will be in an EV in 5 years?...
I think many are underestimating the many gear oils, coolants, and greases that are being developed for EV and Hybrid vehicles.

So, no I do not think BITOG will go away as we will most likely be discussing which non-OEM lubricants, or coolants, or greases that can be used. :D

Also, I think the demise of the ICE is premature as people will finally get educated as to the affect that EV's will have on the overall power grid, a power grid that is not yet ready to accommodate a large percentage of EV's.

In addition, EV's are not ready for prime time as well, so I think gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles will be around for some time.
 
Last edited:
Jeff - I want a Tesla.

Problem is, that would bring me up to 9 cars. And right now, there isn’t a Tesla (or any other EV) that could adequately replace any of my cars. Nine seems a bit much.

Closest to the S600 is the Model S, the one with the big battery and dual motors.

But not only do I lose the sound of the V-12 but I lose the range.

Example: last week, I drove back from college graduation in Connecticut via Maryland (to drop off my mom) - a 500+ Mile trip. No range worries.

If I can’t replace one of my cars with an EV - they make no sense for me.
@Astro14 you are just being logical again... Ha!
 
EV technology isn't mature yet. Also, Teslas do have oil filters and do need oil changes, albeit not 3000 miles :sneaky:

There will always be somebody that will insist on doing that oil change every 3k :D
 
I think I'm going to wind up being the contrarian here, but what the heck.

EVs currently have the standardization problems of a relatively new-to-market technology, but that hasn't stopped other recent technologies (computers, for example) from transforming the world. We improve things as we go; that's how progress works.

ICEVs look more independent in terms of range and flexibility mostly because the supporting infrastructure isn't finished being built yet. Tesla has demonstrated battery swaps that take less than a minute; you can be back on the road with a fully charged battery in less time than it takes to fill a gas tank. And fast chargers keep getting faster. Right now those things don't help you as much as you'd want, because there aren't fast chargers or battery swap stations all over the place, but there was a time when there weren't gas stations all over either.

Here's another thing: the Ford F-150 Lightning is the first EV capable of acting as a backup battery for your home. In case of a power failure, you can flip a switch on the charger and use the truck's battery to power your entire house for three days (using everything normally) or up to ten days (if you conserve). This capability is expected to become standard for future EVs. This is a positive benefit that ICEVs can't offer, and it will likely have the side benefit of increasing residential solar panel adoption. A lot of potential solar customers want to be independent of grid failures but balk at the added cost of a battery; but if your car can be the battery, that objection is muted.

I don't think it's necessary to see evil machinations of "powers that be" in the move to electric. Sure, there are currently incentives to adopt the new technology, and more regulation is coming, but why assume those things must be working against your long term interest? Regulation is not automatically bad.

Look at LED light bulbs as an example. People bitched and moaned endlessly about regulations phasing out incandescent bulbs, at first. But today, with the technology established, it's obvious that LEDs are the better tech - far more efficient, more durable, and they're now at price parity with the old incandescents. Even when they were $25 a bulb at the beginning, the lifetime cost savings still justified the expenditure, but that was a hard sell. The regulations did the intended job of kickstarting adoption, and we have better light bulbs and lower power bills now because of that. The grid is less stressed, we don't have to build as many expensive new power plants. Everybody wins, except maybe those few people who wanted to use light bulbs as heating elements and didn't want to buy an actual heater for their incubators or Easy Bake ovens.

I know there are people who feel that all regulations are bad and we should let the free market decide everything - I've read Atlas Shrugged too - but imagine what cars would be like today without the safety, emissions, and fuel economy regulations of the past 50 years.
You have to remember filling an EV with hydrogen at any local gas station will be light years faster then swapping out a battery in a Tesla or charging the batteries in a battery only EV.
 
I remember going through the same thing when Quartz watches started dominating the market. Some companies were in a panic and stopped making mechanicals but it didn't take long that mechanical/automatics were still in high demand and if makers wanted to stay in business they had to cater to that market also.

This EV craze is an agenda and politically driven market, I predict that makers will continue to make ICE cars once the shortcomings of the grid and abilty to charge them start putting a dent in their sales and sanity returns to politics.
 
When EVs are widely adopted, you can bet the cost of electricity will skyrocket.

Energy companies are going to bend us over one way or the other.
Oh yeah! We have more choices available with fossil fuels. But with electricity not so much. Most areas have one provider and we’ll be at their mercy…. But I’m sure they’ll have collective public’s best interest at heart. Enron and the California energy crisis, anyone?
 
It would be nice if most of you charged up so my fuels were in less demand & cost far less ...... : )
 
People, especially young people, want Teslas. The demand is insane. If and when they deliver the Model 2 ($30K) it will be game over.
Of course-Honda and GM are partnering and saying $30,000.00 is their price point. So it's a big "Well see"".
 
With over 244 million vehicles currently in operation in the US and new vehicle longevity around 200K miles, it’ll take a while to convert to EVs. The original inflection point was predicted to be 2050, but with the OEMs jumping in with both feet, some are now talking about 2035. As other forum members have mentioned, range and charging stations need to be addressed.
Regardless, I think this forum will continue to be a sounding board for ICE & EV vehicles, motorcycles, OPE, etc…
I also expect there to be lots of future debate on “thick vs thin” voltage. Ha!

Under normal circumstances, I would agree with you, but there is a concerted and deliberate effort to drive fuel prices through the ceiling and 100 feet above the house. As I stated in Post #1.... Fuel prices will drag many drivers, kicking and screaming to the EV Dealership. Sure, 244 million vehicles that burn gas and diesel seem to have a couple decades of stability, but when it starts to cost you $250 to fill your tank.... you will quit driving that combustion engine.

Remember Clunkers to Cash???? I bet you a crisp $100 bill that Combustion to EV is the next program. Turn in your beater for a $20k credit on an EV. I bet at least 90% of the population will take the Govt up on that one.

As for the need for a much, much more robust grid.... Look for vehicle hoods, roofs and back-end to be completely solar cells. Or as others have suggested.... Maybe the future with the most possibility is Hydrogen.

........
 
people need to adjust to market trends, time to learn something new, like dielectric cooling fluids. :p
but bearing grease & gear oil ain´t going anywhere soon.

Maybe our fossil fuel discussion will be focused around the plastics that all these EV's are made of.

Elon's EV's have a butt load of plastics that come from a barrel of West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil.

Man those environmentalists aren't going to be happy when they realize that about 60% of everything they own comes out of a hole.


.........
 
I will definitely own a Tesla in the next 5 years.

Gas powered vehicles will be around for another 50 years…. like it or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom