Pablo, I guess what I was trying to say was that from my time in the corporate world, I was asked many times to "explain" negative results.
Often, timing of reporting was an explanation (fund accounting). Other times, just poor management and forecasting (overly optomistic).
I'm getting the sense of poor management and an overly optomistic outlook. They should never have had the type of FX exposure if proper hedging techniques were used. They apparently gambled and lost in 2005 and got spanked for it. If they would talk in some further detail about hedging their exposures, I would feel more comfortable.
Maybe this year, they gamble and win.
Often, timing of reporting was an explanation (fund accounting). Other times, just poor management and forecasting (overly optomistic).
I'm getting the sense of poor management and an overly optomistic outlook. They should never have had the type of FX exposure if proper hedging techniques were used. They apparently gambled and lost in 2005 and got spanked for it. If they would talk in some further detail about hedging their exposures, I would feel more comfortable.
Maybe this year, they gamble and win.