If it were -90°F at altitude - how do you keep the engines lit if you have to descend?

wwillson

Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
8,059
Location
Colorado
@Astro14 @lurker

Let's say you were cruising at 39,000' and the OAT is -90°F. The combustion is maintained by the engine compressing air, heating it, and fuel being injected. I don't know the minimum required temperature to maintain combustion, but I would guess around 500°F. What happens to combustion if you have to do an emergency descent and you pull the engines to flight idle? Can the compressor stage maintain enough heat to support combustion? Do you have to do anything before pulling the engines to flight idle when it's seriously cold outside?
 
Interesting question. Remember also that you're descending into warmer air. For a back of the envelope estimate, use the standard lapse rate of 3.5*F / 1000' with an emergency descent at 8000 fpm makes 8 * 3.5 = 28* F per minute.
 
Surely the engine control computers are smart enough to handle that. I'd think that the computers would command the ignitors on if needed.

That's just me talking out my butt though.
 
It’s interesting all right. On a flight last week to SEA, I saw an indicated -69*F and 182mph headwind; ground speed had dropped to only 335mph. That’s brisk!
Last week during the stormy weather around Seattle I saw a PIREP at KSEA, wind 75 kts at 2200' (not 22,000', but 2,200'). That's the stiffest wind I've seen in 15 years of flying around this area. No way was I flying my little bug squasher in that weather!
 
I'm no airline pilot but I am pretty sure there is a difference in idle speed/rpm when you're airborne compared to when you are on the ground. The "idle" speed when airborne is a tad higher.

Also keep in mind the fuel is usually going to be much higher in temp than the ambient air. The fuel is used to cool hydraulic and engine oil so it should be a tad warmer. Not to mention there are temperature sensors in the fuel tanks which would necessitate a decent if fuel temp drops below a certain point which is to prevent gelling, but the main reason for these guideline is to keep the fuel pump-able, filter-able, and above all combustible!
 
Yea we were at 34k’ when I saw those numbers. I figured it was peak arctic jet stream! 🤣
Last week during the stormy weather around Seattle I saw a PIREP at KSEA, wind 75 kts at 2200' (not 22,000', but 2,200'). That's the stiffest wind I've seen in 15 years of flying around this area. No way was I flying my little bug squasher in that weather!
 
High by-pass turbofans are fascinating machines. Remember that they don't produce power pulses like a car engine but rather once you "light the fire" it stays burning. Jets don't "inject" fuel into the combustor with timed pulses but instead they spray fuel into the combustor with nozzles just like a garden hose.

When you start the engine you have igniters turned on to ignite the fuel as it's sprayed into the combustor. Once it's lit you turn the igniters off. Imagine 30 fuel nozzles and only two igniters in the annular combustor (big round ring with 30 swirlers that encircle the fuel nozzle).

The power that pushes the plane is largely produced by the fan (about 80%) and much less from the actual exhaust thrust. The whole core of that engine is designed to turn the fan. The low pressure compressor at the front will feed the high pressure compressor. The heat and pressure to pressurize and heat the airplane comes from around the 8 - 10th stage of the high pressure compressor. The highly compressed air, now around 1000ºF simply from compression, flows into the combustion section where a percentage is guided into the combustor where it's ignited. It now flows across the high pressure turbine where the majority of energy is extracted before it then passes across the low pressure turbine and out the back.

The high pressure compressor is physically bolted to the high pressure turbine. The energy from the HPT is used to drive the HPC. The low pressure compressor is attached to the low pressure turbine by a long shaft and the LPT drives the big fan and the low pressure compressor.

This design and theory has served aviation very well and with few modifications until Pratt & Whitney blew the door open with their geared turbofan engine. The geared turbofan controls the big fwd fan of the engine independent of the LPC and LPT speeds. It's revolutionary!!

So, back to the original question - the outside air temperature is rather irrelevant to the actual operation of the engine.

* I've included a internet picture of a combustor for visual effect. This section is actually referred to as the compressor rear frame.
I've snapped a picture of a CFM-56 9th stage compressor blade (w/missing corner due to FOD) and set it next to a penny (euro cent. sorry, I'm in Europe at the moment) to illustrate how much the air gets compressed.
compressor blade.JPG


combustor.JPG
 
Here's something that has always amazed me. I'm including a picture of a low pressure turbine housing with the cooling manifolds attached. These are called "active clearance cooling manifolds". As the LPT case gets hot, it expands. When it expands it causes the clearance between the low pressure turbine blades and the shrouds that seal them to grow. Once this gap between the blade tip and the shroud becomes excessive the efficiency of the LPT goes down. So, these manifolds on the outside of the case draw bleed air from the high pressure compressor and blow it on the case to cool it down and control the blade tip-to-shroud clearance.

The fascinating part? They use 500º air to "cool" the case. These suckers are HOT!

1672878307222.webp
 
Remember, on most planes, the engines provide hot/cold bleed air for pressurization and for other reasons. Even at 51,000 feet, we can pull the throttles back to idle and the pressure (and bleed air temperatures) produced by the engines is more than sufficient to keep the plane properly pressurized and warm inside.

Even at idle at top of descent, the engines are consuming plenty of fuel and the core RPM is fairly high. Despite not making much thrust. Also of note, FAN RPM and thrust is not a linear relationship. A fan at 80% RPM may be making 30 something percent thrust.
 
Last edited:
Since I'm posting pictures... and a bit bored this evening, here's a picture of one of my retirement gifts. It's a fan blade from a JT8D. I worked on the GE90 but those blades wouldn't fit in the back seat of my car :)

View attachment 133986
Georgia and worked for Delta? Hartsfield? You might know a friend of mine that still works there. He's been with them forever. J. Peterson. Super nice dude.
 
The OP might find it interesting that TurboDiesel aircraft engines can operate at high altitudes, no problem, as the turbocharger produces all the manifold pressure the engine needs. However, they do tend to "flame out" when a "true" idle is selected at very high altitudes. Nor will they restart above a given altitude, generally 11,000-14,000 feet, as there is not enough air to compress to produce the necessary heat for compression ignition.

Many diesel powered planes descend with power, to prevent flame out.
 
At 39,000 feet and an outside air temperature of -90°F, the air is extremely cold and thin, and it would be difficult for the engines to maintain sufficient heat to support combustion if the power was reduced to flight idle. In this situation, it is likely that the engine would experience a flameout, which is a condition in which the fuel-air mixture in the engine stops burning and the engine ceases to operate.

If an emergency descent is necessary in these conditions, the pilot would follow the specific procedures outlined in the aircraft's emergency checklist. These procedures may include steps to ensure that the engine is able to maintain sufficient heat to support combustion during the descent. For example, the pilot may be required to increase the power to the engines or adjust the fuel-air mixture to ensure that the engine remains ignited.

It is important for pilots to be aware of the potential for engine flameout in extreme cold conditions, and to be familiar with the appropriate procedures for responding to this type of emergency.
 
The OP might find it interesting that TurboDiesel aircraft engines can operate at high altitudes, no problem, as the turbocharger produces all the manifold pressure the engine needs. However, they do tend to "flame out" when a "true" idle is selected at very high altitudes. Nor will they restart above a given altitude, generally 11,000-14,000 feet, as there is not enough air to compress to produce the necessary heat for compression ignition.

Many diesel powered planes descend with power, to prevent flame out.
I have quite a bit of time in a Malibu Mirage, twin turbo piston engine. The service ceiling is 25,000' and cabin pressurization comes from the turbos. If you were to pull the power back to idle while pressurized, you lose pressurization and quickly. However, you can't reduce power that quickly, if you do you'll shock-cool the engine and crack the cylinders. If you do this, you'll be $$$ very sorry. You had to reduce power no more the 2" manifold pressure/minute, which makes it a tough airplane to fly. When you're at 25,000' controllers expect you can descend at the rate airliners do, you can't. You're constantly asking for lower as you get closer to your destination, else you'll get a slam-dunk descent that you can't comply with. You want to really irritate a controller? Don't warn them about your limited descent capabilities and tell them you can't comply when they clear you for lower with a crossing restriction. If you do this, make sure you have a lot of fuel, because you're about to go on a vector-tour of a large area of airspace. I only made that mistake once.
 
At 39,000 feet and an outside air temperature of -90°F, the air is extremely cold and thin, and it would be difficult for the engines to maintain sufficient heat to support combustion if the power was reduced to flight idle.
I will try to take a video on Friday. The autothrottles will pull the power all the way back at top of descent. I can video the synoptic page with RPM's, temps and pressures. From this we can know the air pressures and temperatures available for bleed air, this air is not taken from the final stage of compression, so the core of the engine has even more pressure. At idle with the engine running, at altitude, there is plenty of pressure to support reliable combustion. However a re-start requires lower altitudes.
 
Cujet would that be because of the air density not being able
I have quite a bit of time in a Malibu Mirage, twin turbo piston engine. The service ceiling is 25,000' and cabin pressurization comes from the turbos. If you were to pull the power back to idle while pressurized, you lose pressurization and quickly. However, you can't reduce power that quickly, if you do you'll shock-cool the engine and crack the cylinders. If you do this, you'll be $$$ very sorry. You had to reduce power no more the 2" manifold pressure/minute, which makes it a tough airplane to fly. When you're at 25,000' controllers expect you can descend at the rate airliners do, you can't. You're constantly asking for lower as you get closer to your destination, else you'll get a slam-dunk descent that you can't comply with. You want to really irritate a controller? Don't warn them about your limited descent capabilities and tell them you can't comply when they clear you for lower with a crossing restriction. If you do this, make sure you have a lot of fuel, because you're about to go on a vector-tour of a large area of airspace. I only made that mistake once.
Not that I know much about aircraft the with aircraft of any kind but it seems $$$ isn't close to being enough! Remember high school Latin,, Air craft is a Latin word meaning expensive.
 
@Astro14 @lurker

Let's say you were cruising at 39,000' and the OAT is -90°F. The combustion is maintained by the engine compressing air, heating it, and fuel being injected. I don't know the minimum required temperature to maintain combustion, but I would guess around 500°F. What happens to combustion if you have to do an emergency descent and you pull the engines to flight idle? Can the compressor stage maintain enough heat to support combustion? Do you have to do anything before pulling the engines to flight idle when it's seriously cold outside?
The part about the emergency descent is irrelevant because we always descend at idle ( unless a small altitude change ).

The only difference in an emergency descent is speed and speed brakes ( high rate of descent...7000 Feet per minute ) and we only do this if we lose cabin pressure entirely ( or some other major reasons have to get down fast like cargo fire, smoke in cockpit, etc ).

No, it won't cause any problems for combustion and there are no issues with just "pulling em back" to idle ( well, we put the engine anti-ice on at times ) whether in a normal descent or emergency descent.

The only outside air temp limit is -94 F ( flight envelope certification limit ) above 32,000 and planning to avoid flight at altitudes where the temperature is -85F or less ( for fuel reasons ). Talking about the Airbus here.

The only thing that will cause combustion problems is torrential rain that exceeds engine certification limits ( B737 in Africa that flamed out after flying into severe weather and another near Louisiana ). I am talking about extreme weather and flying right into it.

34 Years Ago This Week - The Miracle Of TACA Flight 110​

BY LUKE PETERS
PUBLISHED MAY 22, 2022

How a flight crew skillfully averted disaster following a double engine failure.

Photo: Airliners.net via Wikimedia Commons
Many readers will be familiar with the story of US Airways Flight 1549, the so-called 'Miracle on the Hudson' with Chesley 'Sully' Sullenberger at the controls. Yet in 1988, a remarkably similar incident befell the crew of a TACA International Boeing 737-300. This is the story of how the crew on that flight also pulled off a remarkable landing, saving not only the aircraft but all passengers and crew onboard The story became known as the 'Miracle on the Levee'.

History of TACA flight 110​

On May 24th, 1988, flight 110 was on a routine scheduled flight from Belize City to New Orleans, USA. The flight that day was operated by a Boeing 737-300 registered N75356. TACA flight 110 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight between San Salvador, El Salvador, and New Orleans, Louisiana, with an en-route stop in Belize City, Belize.

This aircraft was almost brand new, having only had its first flight on January 26th, 1988. It had only been in service with TACA for just two weeks since joining the airline from US-based Polaris Leasing before operating flight 110. The aircraft (MSN 23838) was Boeing's 1,505th 737 off the production line.

N75356 had been flying for TACA for just two weeks. Photo: Howard J Nash via Wikimedia Commons
That day, the operating crew on flight 110 comprised Captain Carlos Dardano (aged 29), who had 13,410 total flight hours of experience, with almost 11,000 of these as pilot-in-command. The first officer, Dionisio Lopez, was also very experienced, with more than 12,000 flight hours logged.

Captain Arturo Soley, an instructor pilot, was also in the cockpit, monitoring the performance of the Boeing 737-300, which was a new type of the airline's fleet, although it had operated the 737-200 for years.

With 38 passengers and a crew of seven onboard, the flight departed Belize City's Philip S.W. Goldson International Airport. It was planned to fly across the Gulf of Mexico, crossing the Louisiana coast, before making its descent and approach to New Orleans International Airport.



Double engine flame-out​

As flight 110 proceeded along its flight path, it commenced its descent towards New Orleans. Passing through 35,000 feet (10,500m), the flight crew noticed extensive thunderstorm activity displayed on their weather radar on the flight deck of their brand new aircraft.

Alongside some isolated areas of heavy precipitation being displayed on their path ahead, the pilots did what they could to avoid the worst of the storm, flying between the heaviest areas of rain, shown as red 'weather cells' on their onboard display.

At 30,000 feet (10,000m), the flight entered thick cloud, and the pilots selected the 'continuous ignition' switches for both engines to 'on'. They also turned on the anti-ice systems to protect the engines from the heavy rainfall and potential icing conditions, which can cause a 'flame-out' where both engines lose power.

Despite the crew's best efforts, however, the aircraft entered an area of the storm and encountered severe rainfall, combined with hail and turbulence. As the plane descended through 16,500 feet (4,950m), both CFM-56 turbofan engines experienced total flame-outs, causing the loss of all thrust and electrical power onboard.


This left the stricken aircraft gliding downwards with neither engine producing either thrust or electrical power. The crew had already selected the thrust levers to flight-idle power setting in preparation for landing just before the flameout occurred.


Attempts to re-start the engines fail​

The crew, following standard operating procedures, started the aircraft's auxiliary power unit as the plane descended through 10,500 feet (3,150m), which managed to restore electrical power and hydraulics to the aircraft, giving the pilots some maneuvering capability but also crucially, the power required to attempt to re-start the engines - using the 'windmill' effect of air passing through the fan at the front of the engines to re-start them.

However, although the crew managed to restart the engines, neither produced more than idle power. This resulted in the aircraft having no meaningful thrust and preventing the crew from maneuvering the plane towards New Orleans International Airport.

Attempts to advance the throttles only resulted in overheating the engines, so the pilots eventually decided to shut down both engines to avoid engine damage, or worse still, an engine fire.



Unable to reach a suitable airfield​

As the crew realized the grave situation they found themselves in, the first officer transmitted a 'mayday' call over the radio to New Orleans air traffic controllers. Despite their best efforts to vector flight 110 towards the airport, the aircraft could not make the distance remaining, given its lack of propulsion at this point.

The controllers offered a potential landing site at nearby New Orleans Lakeland Airport as an alternative. However, with height and airspeed both receding rapidly, the pilots knew that they could not reach this alternative landing site either.

Having abandoned attempts to re-ignite the damaged engines, the three pilots scanned the immediate area off the nose of the aircraft for possible sites for a forced landing. Given the altitude and airspeed remaining, no other hard runway landing sites were available.

Consequently, the crew was facing the unenviable task of executing a water-based landing upon the swampy wetlands of Louisiana.

As flight 110 descended through the lower layer of storm clouds and the clear sight of the ground became possible, the pilots noticed a wide drainage canal straight in front of the aircraft. With the flaps and gear retracted, the crew reluctantly decided to ditch their new plane in the canal.


Captain Dardano lined up with the canal located near an industrial area east of the city. He stretched the glide to try to have it glide the longest possible distance without stalling while the first officer ran through the ditching checklist, configuring the aircraft for a water landing.

Suddenly, the first officer noticed a long grass levee to the right of the canal. A levee is a raised embankment built to prevent the overflow of a river or waterway. This levee was on the grounds of the NASA Michoud Assembly Facility in eastern New Orleans, near the Intracoastal Waterway and Mississippi River Gulf Outlet.

He suggested to the captain that an emergency landing be attempted on that. Captain Dardano agreed, and he subsequently carried out a successful landing of the aircraft along the top of the grassy levee to the side of the canal, bringing the plane to a halt with distance to spare.

The incredible landing was executed atop a grass strip section of the levee measuring 6,060 feet by 120 feet wide (1,818m by 36m). Miraculously, the aircraft sustained minimal damage in the forced landing attempt, and there were no serious injuries amongst any of the 38 passengers or seven crew members.



The investigation of Flight 110​

Following an extensive investigation led by the National Transport Investigation Bureau (NTSB), it was found that flight 110 had inadvertently flown into a level 4 thunderstorm. Water ingestion had caused both engines to flame out during descent with a lower engine power setting. This was despite the CFM-56 powerplants being certified to meet the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards for water ingestion.

The engines were severely damaged by hail ingestion and ice damage, and the number 2 engine (starboard side) suffered additional damage from overheating. The aircraft sustained mild hail damage to its nose and cockpit area, but miraculously, the airframe remained relatively unscathed from its close scrape with Mother Nature.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom