That too would be disingenuous.I like how they dont count ice equipped hybrid and phev as ice.
The real news headline would be "ice vehicles will remain 90% of market. With poor outlook on EV sales after the $7500 wealth transfer is canceled."
It’s four years. We have that system as everyone knows. The papers are held in the Archives. People in office come and go as the papers say they do. As population ages, desires change. I would say electric vehicles are going to be it, sooner or later. Doesn’t bother me one way or the other.If the new administration makes the moves I expect them to make, new and used EV sales in the USA are going to quickly tank. Currently, the EPA requires all automakers to meet strict (and ever stricter) fuel economy standards, and the OEMs use EVs to improve the average MPG across the board. Trump has made statements that lead many to believe that he will ease up on those EPA standards. If these standards are relaxed, there's much less pressure on the OEMs to invest in and produce EVs to offset the high profit "gas guzzlers" they are most focused on. The retail/consumer incentives to purchase EVs will likely disappear as well, as will massive investments by the government to increase EV charging infrastructure. The Biden administration has forced the automakers into the "EV Zone" and this has spawned both US and foreign based companies to commit to spending tens of billions of dollars to build EV battery plants in the US to increase "domestic component content" into those vehicles. If the OEMs are given free reign of what they want to build and sell (which is based on sales volume and profit margins), it's a given that the production of ICE vehicles will increase and EVs will decrease, based primarily on waning consumer demand due to higher EV prices, less availability, and lack of rebates/incentives. And since much of what goes into EVs is derived from China, I expect tariffs to increase component and material costs, which will further increase the selling price of those cars. Even if EV prices increase 30% or more, there will still be consumers willing to spend the money, albeit far less of them than what's currently being sold. And all of this will have a chilling effect on used EV pricing, which will increase lease prices due to high depreciation and make some new EV buyers wary. It will be interesting to see how things will change once all the chips fall into place, and I expect it will be apparent fairly quickly, based on the aggressiveness of the "new team" that will be in place next week.
I am not sure that is at all accurate. Prius was dead maybe (yellow bar), but hybrids were not, although granted they were still a small number. In fact when I bought our Rav4 in 2019, I got an e-price from where I eventually bought. I was told I could have $5500 off MSRP for ICE (which around here includes the port adders), or I could get a hybrid at MSRP but I would have to wait on it. In California they were paying well above list for hybrid Rav4 according to the boards. This was pre-pandemic - so above list was considered nuts. For the $8K difference, clearly I bought ice.That too would be disingenuous.
We need to remember circa 2019 PHEV and hybrids were almost dead with much lower sales.
And a decade before that people were more enraged by hybrids than they currently are with EVs.
This boom in that segment which mostly lacks .gov incentives is good if we want to reduce foreign fuel use. (Since you are concerned with the $7500 hybrids never get and PHEVs rarely get due to sourcing and battery size requirements). AKA 4 PHEV models get a partial credit out of the 33 models in the us.
It’s funny how the Prius target moved to a Tesla target.
Yes, I guess locomotives are now EV's. The railroads have been green since what - the 40's? Who knew!!!I like how they dont count ice equipped hybrid and phev as ice.
The real news headline would be "ice vehicles will remain 90% of market. With poor outlook on EV sales after the $7500 wealth transfer is canceled."
It's not quite that simple. Depends on your ability to charge.Correct, and that's rare. Very few Americans regularly drive 250 miles. And even those who do, who are undoubtedly racking up big mileages and fuel costs, have all the more reason to decide on an EV as they stand to save the most money from fuel savings.
The average car trip in the US is 12 miles (AAA). Only 7% of car trips in the US are over 30 miles (US DOE). People in the US travel an average of 40 miles per workday. EVs already work for the vast majority of Americans.
I don’t agree.This isn't wrong but it's not an accurate perception of the issue. It's going to happen that way not because of facts of the market, but because US car companies want it that way. Definitely not because US consumers want it that way.
Domestic car companies want to sell what makes them money: Correct, and that's ICE's, because that's all domestic car companies have. Domestic car companies cannot compete on EVs. So instead of consumers winning with cheap EVs and domestic car companies taking the loss they deserve for under-investing in competitive products, they are going to call in the government to ban/tariff away the competition. So the consumers lose, and domestic car companies win...for a now...in the short term. But in the long term, it's not even good for domestic car companies, because they fall further behind and even less competitive.
It's not that US consumers don't want EVs. They just don't want EVs at inflated prices. The US car companies and the US government are making deliberate steps to eliminate the threat of competitive (i.e. cheap) EVs from the US market. As I said before, their actions are the best proof you need. Nobody needs to levy 100% tariffs on products that "the American consumers don't want". The only reason to levy tariffs is because the industry KNOWS that US consumers want cheap EVs and are going to buy them hand over fist if/when they become availeble, and US car companies know they do not have any products to compete.
The market is doing a very similar thing it did in the 80s when smaller, more reliable, more fuel-efficient foreign cars started to threaten US car makers. They had no equivalent products to compete, and they responded with a combination of protectionism and "if you can't beat em join em" tactics of re-branding foreign cars, thus the Geo Metro (made by Suzuki), Geo Prism (made by Toyota), small pickup trucks (made by datsun etc). The exact same thing is happening with EVs. The Chevy Bolt is a global creation from a Chinese design using a Korean drivetrain. You can only buy a foreign EV if General Motors gets a cut (and inflates the price to levels sufficient not to cannibalize their other products).
There is no question. It already happened, and domestic manufacturers are not in a position to compete. Definitively. Batteries can already be made cheap enough to make ICE cars look unattractive by comparison. Battery costs are already at a level that wasn't predicted to arrive until 2030. The revolution already happened! And there is no way US companies can compete while having to buy Chinese batteries. The most American EV, Tesla, is even using Chinese batteries.
I posted this here, or maybe another thread, but there are lots of BYD's available for under $20K. So we don't get one because the sacred ones must be protected, not battery cost.
I went to big German industrial Automation trade show in November. All anyone could talk about was BYD and other Chinese EV manufacturers eating VW and others lunch. They can't tariff China because Germany is also an exporter, and China one of their largest customers. German car industry is in big trouble. But of course westerners taught China how to build cars, so you reap what you sow I guess.I can see why they don't want the BYD cars in the US, it is a much better looking car inside and out, the performance difference is not worth talking about. Waiting for someone to post a video of a Tesla beating the BYD in a drag race (like anyone cares) or some more button pics. LOL
https://www.byd.com/eu/blog/How-the-BYD-SEAL-is-redefining-the-electric-saloon
That's a true side effect of tariffs, they'll just return the favor. We're going to find out the hard way though. Frankly I'd rather have more locally built car for employment reasons, but just like most major large production vehicles, I'm sure if BYD came here they would build some cars here. We've given up so much manufacturing to China that I think it is inevitable and I don't think tariffs are a fix for all of the outsourcing that has taken place. Business has created this situation and we will get the results that entails as you mention.I went to big German industrial Automation trade show in November. All anyone could talk about was BYD and other Chinese EV manufacturers eating VW and others lunch. They can't tariff China because Germany is also an exporter, and China one of their largest customers. German car industry is in big trouble. But of course westerners taught China how to build cars, so you reap what you sow I guess.
We also taught them how to build nuke plants, and now they are going gangbusters on them.I went to big German industrial Automation trade show in November. All anyone could talk about was BYD and other Chinese EV manufacturers eating VW and others lunch. They can't tariff China because Germany is also an exporter, and China one of their largest customers. German car industry is in big trouble. But of course westerners taught China how to build cars, so you reap what you sow I guess.
Yes, well that is the elephant in the room. When there isn't enough electricity for AI data centers, and there isn't enough Electricity for the manufacturing we need to re-shore because of our position with the globalized world, are we going to let EV owners continue to buy subsidized grid electricity to charge EV's on the cheap?We also taught them how to build nuke plants, and now they are going gangbusters on them.
There wasn't a choice in November 2024 that didn't support the tarriffs. The 2021-2025 administration put the China EV tariff in place and the 2025-2029 administration almost certainly will keep it or perhaps even go farther. Maybe one of the few things they agree on.So we don't get one because the sacred ones must be protected, not battery cost.
What I have learned from your numbers, is that solar absolutely makes sense in California. Insane.In our household, we have a Honda Prologue, a Chevy Bolt, and a Nissan Kicks.
Let's compare cost per mile. For gas prices, I'm going to use $4.50/gallon. For electricity, I'm going to say $0.55/kwh.
Prologue... I average about 2.5mi/kwh. That means the cost per mile is $0.22.
Bolt... I average about 3.5mi/kwh. That means the cost per mile is $0.16.
Kicks... Let's say it gets 30MPG. Cost per mile is $0.15.
I hope we're smarter than that and not allow the EV owners to buy the electric on the cheap if that does in fact play out. The $7,500 incentive [soon to go away] was enough imo. Too much in fact.Yes, well that is the elephant in the room. When there isn't enough electricity for AI data centers, and there isn't enough Electricity for the manufacturing we need to re-shore because of our position with the globalized world, are we going to let EV owners continue to buy subsidized grid electricity to charge EV's on the cheap?
Well...they would probably want to build many of the subassemblies in China, especially the batteries. But those would also come under the proposed tarriffs. They could build a US based supply chain but that would be a lot more work than just building a facility for assembling vehicles. Considering the political climate it probably doesn't make sense for them from a risk-reward perspective.We assume that BYD wants to sell cars in the United States. However, if they did all they would have to do is build a factory here.
Pretty much the same like Chinese owned Volvo or any foreign company.
Of course the USA is a fantastic market, but we have to get off our high horse. We are only 350 million people out of EIGHT billion people on this planet. BYD is currently building cars as fast as they can and selling them. One day if they want to come to our shore, they will simply build a factory here.
I am sure they will but right now it doesn’t make sense for them.
In the meantime, they have all of Europe and their own population of 1.4 billion people to sell cars to. This is why all companies want to sell products in China. 1.4 billion people and the reason why Tesla is there.
I don't think he means direct subsidies to consumers. Rather something more like this: https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-much-...subsidize-electricity-generating-technologiesI hope we're smarter than that and not allow the EV owners to buy the electric on the cheap if that does in fact play out. The $7,500 incentive [soon to go away] was enough imo. Too much in fact.
We shall see.I don't think he means direct subsidies to consumers. Rather something more like this: https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-much-...subsidize-electricity-generating-technologies