Originally Posted By: ctc
Originally Posted By: Liquid_Turbo
Originally Posted By: ctc
Originally Posted By: gfh77665
Due to dubious business practices (I really don't know what to believe!), and after well more than a decade of 100% Mobil 1 use, I just switched over to PP 5-30 for my 2000 Silverado (5.3) with 170,000 on the OD. Along with a Napa Gold filter, I am making the change and hoping for the best.
You don't find labeling PP as a synthetic dubious as well? I know it is a good oil but it is hydro cracked dino oil no?
It's not dubious because it's legal in the United States to do it.
(Potentially) Failing a Seq IV test and selling an oil as API certified?
Anyway, I'm a PP convert and I'll probably never look back.
Just because it is legal to call it synthetic doesn't make it right. There are many things that are legal to do in the US that are not necessarily good things to do.
I've got no problem with PP and the UOAs look good. However, if I'm buying a synthetic, it should be a synthetic.
Also, marketing accusations don't sway me. Let me see the proof.
just my 2 cents
Here we are, arguing semantics. I don't really understand your logic. Your own government issued the definition. How is it dubious if companies adhere to something legal?
What are you concerned about, the fact that its labeled synthetic but wasn't actually created by men in white coats in a laboratory?
Why not be concerned about the performance of the oil, rather than the category of its basestock?