Originally Posted By: Trav
Fact is it does clean and synthetics also have seal conditioners.
The concerns you have were perhaps relevant in the late 70's but have long since been addressed.
If what you say was true half the cars i work on would be peeing oil and they are not.
The exact same thing was said of multi grade oils in the 50's, they would cause leaks.
Some of the very early ones did at least in Europe but it was quickly corrected.
Your arguing a better quality dino causes leaks more than a slightly lesser dino.
No just saying high quality DINO group 3's have better cleaning packs that than the conventional and more likely to expose false seals than the cleaning packs in conventional DINO oils. Sad it has taken this number of posts to spell that out.
In respect to peeing oil, weeping more likely. Even though the SYN oils have seal conditioners in it, if the seal is old and brittle, the seal conditions in the SYN oil will do little for the seal to swell and self heal itself properly, Hence a leak.
In any case your argument for using SYN negates itself, if what you imply means conventional DINO oils have the same cleaning packs and ability as the SYN oils why change to SYN oil ?
The concerns form 1970's in switching are still here today, perhaps with a lower risk of weeping or occurring. Non the less there is still a risk. Why are seal conditioners required if there is NO risk of weep or leak ?
The vehicle is 16 years old or this makes no difference either ?
If you are so sure of your information perhaps you will provide a warranty with your advice to the OP, if the engine develops a weep or leak then are you willing to contribute to say 20% of the repair costs ?