Hmm. After thinking about this a bit, here are my thoughts. I think I've had a somewhat short sighted view of what the bypass valve does. The bypass valve exists to ensure that flow requirements are met in case the filtration media imposes to great a restriction on the oil, be it b/c the oil is cold or the filter is clogged up.
Yep ... true statement.
So the bypass PSI is selected by engineers based on the expected pressure drop across the filter media to cover most driving situations. The 13psi bypass that is typical of filters for the k20a2 is based on using 5w-30 oil and revving to 8000rpm with oil squirters installed.
Most likely true. Filter engineer's design the bypass valve setting based on the engine specs and expected filter use duration (oil pump volume output performance, RPM, oil viscosity, expected OCI and media loading, etc). For instance, there is a reason Subaru specifies an oil filter with a 23 psi bypass valve ... the engine has a pretty high volume oil pump. And of course, the engineers have to assume the driver will at some time hammer the thing to redline now and then for more than a few seconds. I doubt the Subarus used in off road rally races use a filter with an 8-10 psi bypass valve.
However, in my case, I'm using a heavier oil. The oil pump is a positive displacement pump, so it's moving the same volume of oil, but the pressure pre-filter is higher because the thicker oil does not move as freely through the filter media, especially at high flow volumes. Because the thicker oil does not flow as freely through the filter as a thinner oil, the PSID pre/post filter goes up. This can potentially result in the undesirable case of the bypass staying open more often than not.
Yes ... this has been my viewpoint also for sometime. Depending on the pump's volume output, the oil viscosity and the filter's design (flow vs PSID performance AND bypass valve setting) it is very possible that there is more filter bypass action going on then one would think. Of course, we can all sit around and theorize and debate if it can happen or not, and how often it happens ... but to verify it, one would have to actually determine the filter PSID under driving conditions with pressure measurements to validate the theory or not.
Clearly I don't want to give up oil flow, so modifying the relief in the oil pump may not be desirable as that results in part of the oil flow being diverted back into the pan. Finding a filter with a higher bypass PSI would ensure full flow filtration without giving up oil flow.
My thought on this is if the oil pump relief pressure setting was increased, you will be getting higher oil flow volume up to and at the point where the pump goes into relief mode. From that point on, the input pressure to the filter/engine flow circuit is essentially fixed at the relief pressure ... and that also means the volume going through the filter/engine circuit is also fixed, and determined by the total resistance of the circuit. So, in other words, if the pump goes into relief at say 120 psi (after modification) vs. 90 psi (OEM setting), then there will be more volume going down the filter/engine circuit at the 120 psi relief setting than a the 90 psi setting. All the filter/engine circuit knows is that X psi is pushing oil through the circuit ... and the higher the input pressure is, the higher the volume is. On the extreme other end of the scale to drive home the example, if the pump relief was set to 20 psi then there wouldn't be much oil going down the filter/engine flow circuit, but most of the volume would be shunted back to the sump. But yes, it's true that if the oil pump relief setting was increased, then the oil filter would be even more likely to go into bypass mode due to the increased flow ... but, the total volume (flow through media + flow trough bypass) would be increased with a pump relief setting that is higher.
However, the best option might be to find an even bigger filter so that even at high flow volumes, the PSID across the filter media doesn't exceed the 13psi of the stock spec bypass.
True ... more media surface area results in less total PSID across the filter with the same flow volume and viscosity.
So really, what I need to do is get on the ball and measure the PSID across the filter b/c the pressure on one side or the other doesn't tell me anything. It's the difference that matters.
Agreed ... plus Gary and I want to see who's theory is right on if you're filter is in bypass more than one would imagine ... well, at least one of us.