It's not news around here that Honda is perhaps the only carmaker that advises against an early change of the factory oil fill. This recommendation seems to have become a bit dormant recently, but as the owner of a new Honda product I'm again wondering why this is important to them.
Honda's assembly lubes are rich in molybdenum, as demonstrated by UOAs of factory fills and the molybdenum seems to be the driver behind Honda's recommendation.
Most car makers, including Honda, advise against full throttle acceleration during engine break-in. From what I understand, this can be detrimental to good piston ring sealing because too much throttle applied too long can create hot spots where there is a lot of piston ring/cylinder wall friction and these hot spots can create glazing, forever compromising the seal.
Could Honda's recommendation be because molybdenum can mitigate these hot spots and glazing should new owners not follow break-in recommendations? Even if this is the case it's hard to imagine much piston ring break-in occurring at 4, 5 or 10 thousand miles, but it's all I've got. And I know the early vs regular OCI of the factory fill debate will go on forever; I'm just trying to understand why Honda is an outlier on this subject.
Does this make sense? Any other theories? Thanks.
Honda's assembly lubes are rich in molybdenum, as demonstrated by UOAs of factory fills and the molybdenum seems to be the driver behind Honda's recommendation.
Most car makers, including Honda, advise against full throttle acceleration during engine break-in. From what I understand, this can be detrimental to good piston ring sealing because too much throttle applied too long can create hot spots where there is a lot of piston ring/cylinder wall friction and these hot spots can create glazing, forever compromising the seal.
Could Honda's recommendation be because molybdenum can mitigate these hot spots and glazing should new owners not follow break-in recommendations? Even if this is the case it's hard to imagine much piston ring break-in occurring at 4, 5 or 10 thousand miles, but it's all I've got. And I know the early vs regular OCI of the factory fill debate will go on forever; I'm just trying to understand why Honda is an outlier on this subject.
Does this make sense? Any other theories? Thanks.