Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
Both the GTX & HX5 15W40s will probably be very similar in their basic structure; Group II with a smidge of Group III, 22 SSI OCP VII (Lz 7077), a nothing special DI delivering 8-ish TBN and 800 - 1000ppm of Phos.
Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
15W40 oils, .... Now that they are primarily based on Group II, they are even better. You get good oxidation stability, 8 TBN min, a goodly amount of Zinc, great film strength, low wear and, most importantly, you get lowish Noack volatility.
The other thing I might add is that because 15W40 oils are as often as not formulated as a matrix (rather than individually), they tend to carry the treat rate of DI needed for the more problematic 10W40 grade. As such, most 15W40s benefit from being over-formulated.
All this makes me wonder how much "better" a semi-synthetic 10W40 (SN & A3/B4) is from a conventional 15W50 (SN & A3/B3) ? Apart from TBN differences (B4 > 10), I always assumed that the 10W40 semi-synthetic was much more advanced, it was certainly always priced more.
But now that I hear about this development matrix, the problematic 10W40 grade, and previously you have said that a semi-synthetic can be either a Group 1 & Group 3 mix or a Group 2 & Group 3 mix, so a semi may still contain Group 1. Sure the semi has better cold starting (10W) but that means nothing in Australia, where 20W50 will work year round.
It all makes me think the two oils (10W40 & 15W40) are closer than I first believed and that I may be better off buying the cheaper 15W40.
Apart from a bit more TBN and a bit more cold starting, does a 10W40 semi-synthetic offer me any more advantages over a 15W40 Group 2 mineral oil ?