What traffic hazard was present?If you are going substantially slower than the speed limit due to a weather/vis issue then it's fine per your post.
What traffic hazard was present?If you are going substantially slower than the speed limit due to a weather/vis issue then it's fine per your post.
Going significantly slower than normal is a hazard.What traffic hazard? Don't think people feeling like they shouldn't be driving is the intent of the law. A "traffic hazard" means a wreck/blockage, otherwise, if you can't drive in the rain then pull off the road. Once you're on the side of the road THEN turn your hazards on.
Everyone was going significantly slower than normal, sooo that was the new normal. No hazard existed.Going significantly slower than normal is a hazard.
The law you quoted states that. The law requiring slow trucks on the highway to use hazards states that.
You are the traffic hazard if you are going well below the speed limit.What traffic hazard was present?
Many years ago…Everyone was going significantly slower than normal, sooo that was the new normal. No hazard existed.
Doesn't matter to me, I appreciate when people use them because it lets me know they are a person who I need to watch out for because they know they shouldn't be on the road at that time.
Not all cars have rear fog light(s). Even worse are the people that use rear fog light(s) in non-inclement weather conditions, since some manufactures have a rear fog switch that is directly tied to the front fog, ie when the front fogs are on, so are the rear fog (and drivers are too lazy/stupid to turn it off).That’s what the rear fog light is for.
Hate it. Think they are braking.Not all cars have rear fog light(s). Even worse are the people that use rear fog light(s) in non-inclement weather conditions, since some manufactures have a rear fog switch that is directly tied to the front fog, ie when the front fogs are on, so are the rear fog (and drivers are too lazy/stupid to turn it off).
VW requires you to physically turn on the rear fog each time, as it is a last pull detent on the switch.
The real hazard is people with improper tires, which applies mostly to snow conditions, or worn out tires for the conditions (rain and snow).Had a HUGE rain last night that caught me coming home from dinner....so 30mph or so max on a 60mph highway. Many folks fuss about people that use their hazards during these conditions driving v. slowly. I personally do not do this typically but also don't have an issue with it b/c you can certainly see the vehicles in front of you better vs. the regular somewhat dull tails. Why does this trigger some folks?
What negative are you talking about? If the conditions aren’t really that bad you simply pass them and you don’t see the hazards anymore. What’s the problem?In general I'm a "hazards" hater. What Tigeo describes is, IMO the correct use of hazards. Far to many operators throw hazards on for reasons that certainly appear to be indiscriminate use. That IMO causes more negative than ay positive it may be seeking to put forth.
Many years ago…
I-70 westbound out of Golden. Posted 70 MPH limit. Raining. Rain changes to ice with altitude. I feel the car slip, a tiny bit, so I slow to 30 MPH because I’m driving on ice. I put on the hazards.
I then watch the bozo behind me, the one who thinks I’m the idiot who should not be on the road, pass me at 70, and then lose control. The first of dozens of cars in the subsequent pile up.
Maybe that guy should’ve paid more attention.
The presumption that I am the incompetent, because I used my hazards, is foolish. I avoided losing control. I avoided the pile up.
I tried to warn those behind me.
But hey, that guy knew better…
You proved my point. No one can drive on ice without special equipment, you shouldn't have been on the road and you knew it.Many years ago…
I-70 westbound out of Golden. Posted 70 MPH limit. Raining. Rain changes to ice with altitude. I feel the car slip, a tiny bit, so I slow to 30 MPH because I’m driving on ice. I put on the hazards.
I then watch the bozo behind me, the one who thinks I’m the idiot who should not be on the road, pass me at 70, and then lose control. The first of dozens of cars in the subsequent pile up.
Maybe that guy should’ve paid more attention.
The presumption that I am the incompetent, because I used my hazards, is foolish. I avoided losing control. I avoided the pile up.
I tried to warn those behind me.
But hey, that guy knew better…
Lol. That horse of yours must be might high.You proved my point. No one can drive on ice without special equipment, you shouldn't have been on the road and you knew it.
Lol. That horse of yours must be might high.