Not Porsche. Show me what Porsche claimed.Heres a journalism claim that references a tweet (I dont tweet so Id have never see it)
Porsche teases Taycan EV, promises 60 mph in 3.5 seconds
Porsche's first battery-electric vehicle promises to be quite the athlete.www.cnet.com
Andrew Krok.
Andrew Krok
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the...www.cnet.com
Ford Cuts Mach-E prices by thousands
- Thread starter Astro_Guy
- Start date
I already to you in post 78 I dont have any claims from Porsche directly.
That doenst matter though. Me not having that dosn't change what they told automotive journalists they could quote and print.
Yes it does. You have no, none nill evidence. You make a claim, you need to back it up, you haven’t.
I just provided evidence that porsche made a claim and the article is still up standing not refuted.
The journalist stil employed.
It’s not a primary source. Put up or shut up. Journalist is not Porsche.
Andrew Krok wrote the article and put the source in it. Take it up with him.
I never said the journalists were Porsche.
Who cares who wrote what. Show me what Porsche claimed. You can’t. You lost the argument. Go away now.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023
- Messages
- 5
I own a 2007 Escape Hybrid with over 175k. Runs like a top.
No I didnt lose anything.
You tried to turn the argument to only have meaning if it was a quote from the factory directly, not what they joyfully told journalists.
You don't get to decide for anyone else but you how they feel about what they let people quote.
Should have called it the Mustang III. Mustang II was such a big hit last time they tried to satisfy the government.
huh? I just posted the article I was referring to?
The article starts with
Porsche teases Taycan EV
No you made a statement that you can’t back up.
Same reason people care about lap times in a car they use to commute. No logic
I quoted the article and never said it "came from Porsche".
You started with the " show me this" show me that" - thats your particular goalpost.
There is very much a logic to people who appreciate vehicles that handle well.
Calling you out is not a goalpost. It is preventing false information from spreading. You were spreading false information and got called on it.
Nonsense. I quoted an article from a still working credible journalist and said as much.
I could care less if it meets your burden of evidence or proof or other - its there, its still up, and Andrew has more credibility than you do.
Happy to disagree without being disagreeable.
Some people care about company policies or sales or the owner. Still not relevant when sitting in traffic for either car.
Why don’t you just show me what Porsche claimed?
Similar threads
