Ben Ten does.
The traditional men's watch used to have a case diameter of 36mm. Watches did get increasingly bigger, especially tool watches that required high legibility with bigger dials or dive watches with large hands, large indices, large timing bezels, and with more durable cases. By the 1980s an average men's sports watch had a diameter of about 38mm. In the '90s the size increased to 42 to 44mm. Don't get me wrong there were watches of that size even decades earlier (Breitling Navitimer) but they served specific purposes. In the 2000s watch size increased to enormous proportions of up to 50mm and larger. Now there is a trend toward smaller watches and sub-40mm watch cases are becoming increasingly popular.
Case diameter is actually not the important metric when it comes to if a watch fits a certain wrist size comfortably. It is the lug-to-lug distance that determines how well a watch conform to a wrist. Long lugs, short lugs, straight lugs, lugs that curve downward? If a watch has integrated lugs the case can be rather large and still look alright. My dive watch has a vertical diameter of 48mm and a horizontal diameter, including the crown and crown guard, of 55mm. I have a 7-3/4" wrist and the watch does not look humongous. If it had 8mm lugs protruding it would be wearable only over a wet or dive suit.
What also matters are bracelet end links. Male end links will require a larger wrist than female end links. A NATO strap will let your wear a larger watch because the thin strap will come straight down from the spring bars without increasing the watch's vertical width.
You can blame the trend for large watches on Stallone with his propensity for Panerai in the '80s. and on Arnold for making the Seiko H558-5000 "Arnie" popular. He wore this watch in many of his '80s action flicks and Seiko still makes it today.. And then there are rappers. I should probably point the finger also at Invicta. Shudder.
Last edited:
