I just looked up the subject in three of my owners manuals. Our 2010 Honda Element SC, the 2011 BMW E90, and the 2018 VW Passat. In the Honda manual index it has entries for both "Emergency Brake" and "Parking Brake", and point to the same page. But th entry in the actual contents is titled and discussed in a "parking brake" context. No mention of using it in emergency situations. The E90 and Passat owners manuals are the same - neither have an "Emergency Brake" entry in the index, just "Parking Brake". And the contents are titled and discussed in the context of "Parking Brake". However, both the E90 and Passat caution against misuse of the "parking brake", saying it should not be used to slow the vehicle - unless in an emergency situation.Not sure I believe that. Where did you get this info? Link?
This suggests to me that they are primarily intended for use as "parking brakes". IMO this context protects them from litigation from someone having to use, and failing, in an emergency situation. I don't ever recall reading about "e brake" standards - which I think there should be. Some are utterly useless. That said, if I ever had to use a parking brake as an emergency brake because of total brake/hydraulic failure, I'm grabbing it!
As an aside, or ramble, take your choice - the parking brake in our E90 can't hold a 2% grade. It would be worthless in an emergency situation, no matter how hard you pulled the lever up (according to the internet this is a problem with this car). I've pulled ours apart and inspected very closely. Cable travel, adjustment, and the mechanical movement within the parking brake assembly (drum style in the hat of of the rotor). Everything moves as it should, virtually factory floor condition. I even tried putting in ATE rear brake shoes, hoping the friction compound was better than the OEMs. No change. I'm mystified what's wrong. Wished it worked better, but I've earned to live with it.
Scott
Last edited: