Ecore Experience

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are we certain that the bypass valve is operational? In block bypasses work very well, in theory they should work better then an in-filter one. Obviously though things can go wrong.

I like the fact that they blocked the bypass on the E-core. You can say it's a backup, but I think in most cases a backup wouldn't do any good.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Gary Allan:
Now WHEN the oil pump is in relief ..this puts the greatest PSID on the filter since it's no longer part of a series circuit. None of the restrictions in the circuit have to merely represent changes in velocity. This is the only time that I've ever seen substantial PSID in across any filter ..even in VERY cold temps with VERY heavy oil.

Huh? When the oil pump is in relief the oil is dumped back into the pan or pump input. How is that going to put the greatest PSID on the filter?
 
Because the filter can actually inhibit flow when the pump is in relief. Otherwise it's just x% of the normal circuit ..trumped by the resistance of the entire engine.

I guess it could be "apparent" PSID ..and I've argued it as such.
 
We certainly appreciate everyone putting some thought into went went wrong with our filter. You've got us thinking a bit more about it and we stepped through some of the things we did that day.

We warmed the car up to about 180 before heading out, but that was the water temp, and not the oil temp. We did whack the throttle a time or two early on, ya know boys will be boys.

We're theorizing ourselves now, but you guys got us thinking. Could one of those early whacks on the throttle with the oil not fully heated might have been enough to force the Ecore filter assembly to one side of the filter housing and block the flow of oil momentarily to start disintegrating the bearing material? From there it could of been a downhill ride as the bearing material starts to plug the filter on each subsequent whack on the throttle and worsened the condition until the bearing was gone and the #7 rod bearing wore through to the crank journal and put an end to the days fun.

I think we read somewhere that the Ecore is formed by a "reverse extrusion" process. We're not plastic extrusion experts, but it sounds technical. Can't say we've ever heard of it before, so it maybe it's a new way of making things.

The only other thing we'll add to this is our own analysis which looked at what has changed or we done differently this year versus the last 3 years. Let's see, same car, same motor, same guys driving it, same oil brand and type, same oil filter p/n, different design. We can't come up with anything else other than the date on the calendar and the oil filter design as the only things that changed. We did find an "old" design PF1218 back on the shelf in the shop and it's substantially beefier in construction compared to the Ecore model. Just an observation there.

We're still buying the engineering design as a better performing filter on paper, but then a lot of things look really good on paper.

Thanks again for everyones input. We'll post the report from Champ as soon as we get it.
 
Red Bowtie,

If I were you, once you've got that bad boy back up and running I would seriously consider switching to a good 10w40 or possibly a 15w40 HD oil instead of 20w50. I would also go to a more traditionally designed Wix or Purolator oil filter.
 
We can probably make a safe bet the AR-Bee isn't going to touch an ecore again. He'll run to the nearest Orange Can of Doom first
grin.gif



I'll second G'man's recomendation ..with the only addition of, perhaps, using a synthetic 5w-40 to further reduce any viscosity issues of any kind in a heavier oil.
 
Red Bowtie:

Now I'm not any type of lab/physics/etc. wiz ..but I think that I may have explored this enough to speak with some moxie ..as flawed or as perfect (not) my figurings have evolved here.

Take a look at this in my plebe stage ..and take a gander here

This is mainly to show you what I base my OPINION on. The findings that I arrived at are hardly conclusive or all encompassing..and are very much like "hearsay evidence". You can't necessarily weigh them for the "truth" of them ..but it gives you the pathway that I used to arrive at my beliefs that I employ here.
smile.gif
 
When there is "excess" pressure and the center tube collapses, what do you think happens to the oil pumps output after the collapse? Do you think the engine starves of oil?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
If the nylon cage design tests out to withstand more differential pressure than a standard metal center tube ( with those wider gaps that the cage has) , what would have happened to a filter with a standard metal center tube in this instance under the pressure the filter "might/must" have seen?

A few things to ponder..
 
Any new construction needs to be critically examined and carefully checked in operation. As I have mentioned, the Nylon center cage was already well proven in the cartridge elements like in my 02 Cavalier and I believe in upmarket European sedan before that. You would need to be terribly unobservant to fail to note problems when you remove one.

People here have also documented filters with less than full length metal center tubes. It seems in normal operation, filter media doesn't need to be fully supported.

I say either the filter had a QC defect, or was abused.
 
quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:

quote:

Originally posted by Gary Allan:
Now WHEN the oil pump is in relief ..this puts the greatest PSID on the filter since it's no longer part of a series circuit. None of the restrictions in the circuit have to merely represent changes in velocity. This is the only time that I've ever seen substantial PSID in across any filter ..even in VERY cold temps with VERY heavy oil.

Huh? When the oil pump is in relief the oil is dumped back into the pan or pump input. How is that going to put the greatest PSID on the filter?


Let me restate that more accurately: You "may" see the highest PSID during pump relief. This can be matched or exceeded by a heavily loaded filter way into its life cycle (or beyond it). It should be trumped by the bypass valve.

(I am, btw, totally open to other interpretations of my reasoning here).

When the pump is in relief you're, typically, at the highest available pressure that the media will see, yet the flow is reduced. The upstream side of the media will see a constant MAX PSI ..while the flow downstream will be reduced. By our frame of reference, the filter is no longer a slice of the total series fluid circuit and can represent a much greater resistance.

Below the relief limit, as seen by the pump, all 'restrictions' only mean a change in velocity. Once the relief is reached, this is no longer the case. Flow is not mandated and it (should) react like any other pressure dependant circuit where any choke is just that, a choke.

There are a few loose ends that I cannot quite "see" intimately. Like.. the reason the pump relief is open is because the engine can accept no more oil at that visc ...so what would a bypass valve accomplish if it opens? It shouldn't be able to pass any more oil ..so what can it possibly do except anntenuate the differential? My mind sees an open bypass valve that's still, effectively, a virtual wall (visions of the Bay of Fundy at high tide).


When I observed higher differentials with my small 1" micro gauges (not the digitals), it was at cold start and it was the downstream pressure that antennuated at a lower level. In extreme cases my lines added to the resistance of the circuit so I'd even see below the normal relief setting of (highest observed AT my point of reference) 82 psi. When there was a differential across the filter, it would be the downstream pressure that would "come up" to meet the supply pressure as the relief closed.

Example:

Normal with light oil at almost any temp:

upstream/downstream
82/80

Heavier oil at cold start

82/74

Very heavy oil under very cold temp

78/62

In this situation my lines reduced the upstream pressure and became part of the resistive circuit. After a few moments (clean filter) it would evolve like this.
(numbers for example only-this transitional state is dynamic an typically brief).
78/62
78/68
79/73
80/76
81/79
82/80

At this point the relief is closed ..my lines are no longer a significant part in the total resistance equation ..nor is the filter.

Add a loaded filter ..and the condition is elongated.

[ June 09, 2006, 09:30 AM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]
 
I was hoping you could realign some of the nebulous "rough edges" of the dinosaurs head from a few pig's teeth that I constructed
grin.gif



It's the intimacy with the machine that's so compelling ...the remote viewing ...the ...
lol.gif
 
At this point in the discussion, after viewing the photos so kindly posted for me by sxg6, and after all very informative dissertations on the physics of pressurized lubrication systems, is anyone feeling comfortable with me screwing an Ecore design oil filter onto my 9+ liter V8 pride and joy and going out and roasting the hides a time or two?

After finding older design PF1218s still hiding on the shelf, and having used them instead, I’m thinking I wouldn’t have been writing this sob story as soon as I am. I probably would have eventually though, when the old stock ran out. (is that a Fram commercial? Pay me now or pay me later)

I did happen to make a call to AC Delco to see what they had to say about the situation. My friendly customer service rep, #58 Kirk, or Kurt, kindly told me I was essentially “stupid” without actually using the word, to have screwed one of these new style filters on the motor. In using his own words, I should have noticed the difference in the two filters, and before using it, I should have called them and inquired about the application – regardless of the fact I’ve used that same part number on the motor for the last 3 years with good success. Thank you, Mr. AC Delco. I’m feeling really good now.

I’m thinking I either got a bad Ecore, or I’m never buying another one again. I know for a fact that I’m not the only guy on the planet with this size of a motor that needs an oil filter, so there has to be something else out there. Any suggestions?

Thanks for everyone’s comments.

PS. The motor is back together again and we're ready to go.
 
Skip the Ecore until we hear something definitively. I, personally, would use something like a K&N or Amsoil Ea, Wix, or the original AC Delco. Do you have an aftermaket high volume oil pump on it per chance, or is this all stock 572 crate motor stuff.
 
Any oil filter will fail if it's subjected to too much internal pressure. A crushed center tube, while looking disastrous, really acted in this case as a safety valve. It may looked like it's plugged but I bet it's not. Had it been plugged you would have burst the filter at the seam.
 
GM oil pump p/n 88963707

Not sure if it's a high volume unit or not. Generally puts out 50-60lbs of pressure at the gauge, but don't have a measure on GPM.

A car buddy of mine is suggesting a Wix brand oil filter. He's had excellent results, he claims, with a similar size motor. I know he's not had to take his motor apart. He also uses the same oil that I do.
 
I changed the oil in my van today, and even though I'd already purchased a SuperTech Ecore I went to Advance Auto and bought a Purolator and used that.

I also put my Chrysler up on the ramps and took the Ecore off (2000 miles into the OCI) and put on a Purolator.

No more Ecores for me.
 
Turbo Jim, that's a good point, but do you think it would have spit the rubber gasket out before blowing the seam between the header and the can?

I didn't see any evidence of the gasket leaking on this filter prior to removing it, so it held the pressure. I have however, see a few Frams that have spit their gaskets out, but both in pretty cold weather, -20deg or so.

I'm going to request Champ send the filter back to me as they mentioned they would. They said we were the owners of it. (I guess I really own this one) We'll cut it open if it's not already and we'll post the pictures. (I might need help again)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom