Ecoboost mustang long term reliability

It's interesting the OP asked about the 2.3L Mustang, and most people have supplied misinformation about the engine, or entirely irrelevant, or second hand information, in reply. I was the one who called MY engine, a 2.3L, which has blown up twice in 96,000 miles, an "eco-boom".
Is a 2.3 the same as a 2.7? NO, it is not.
Does the GM tech work on Ford 2.3 engines? Probably not.
Are turbo charged semis considered performance vehicles in the same way Mustangs are? No.
Is a 7.3 the same as a 2.3? No.
Do you know anything about the 2.3L Mustang engine? Probably not.
It would be great if folks could stay on the subject of this post. High mileage 2.3L Mustangs.
PS the larger eco boosts MAY use both port and direct injection systems, but the 2.3L ecoboost uses only Direct Injection. Contrary to what others have said on this forum.

How are the 2.7 and 3.5 not performance engines when they are meant for towing?
 
I have a 2016 2.3L Mustang EB. The first engine failed at 61,000 miles, the replacement failed at 35,000 miles. I have a Mishimoto intercooler which is better than stock, Ford Performance CAI with its Ford Tune, and a catch can. I drive spirited and I live in Coachella Valley. If it goes below 100° that feels like fall to me. I would not suggest a 4 cylinder turbo anything. Unless its a Subaru under warranty or extended service agreement. I spoke to a lawyer who said he makes a good living off the ecoboom. I love my car when it is running. If you get one with MagneRide and the High Performace (special order around $41,000, it might be worth it) just trade it before the warranty is up. Why not a peppy Honda? Probably what I will buy while I am waiting to see whats covered for parts on my EB, now a week in the shop.

How did your engines fail (I.e., what was the mode of failure)?

What is the required octane fuel for the tune you ran?

What IS noteworthy for your situation, is that CA is well known for its sub-par 91 AKI “premium” fuel.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top