Interesting article in Costco Connections magazine: https://www.costcoconnection.com/may_2024/page9.html
It was TT before-now is it “Super” TT? If it helps with GDI deposits, it’s worth it, but who’s going to be the guinea pig?Interesting article in Costco Connections magazine: https://www.costcoconnection.com/may_2024/page9.html
That test is not a proper test because they didn't use the same base stock gasoline with different additives. The base gas is going to affect the deposit formation as much as the detergent is.Going back to the AAA Fuel Quality Report from 2016: Yeah, there is a difference in Top Tier fuel brands when it comes to performance.
From the study, fuels 4, 5, and 6 were Top Tier fuels.
Fuel 6 exceled at reducing intake valve deposits, with fuels 4 and 5 having 4-7x more deposits. Not to worry, the non-Top Tier fuels had 57x more intake valve deposits, so all the Top Tier fuels were significantly better than the non-Top Tier fuels.
Looking at piston deposits, the opposite was true: Fuels 4 and 5 revealed less piston depots and fuel 6 had more.
All three are Top Tier fuels, but some detergent packages appear to trade performance on intake valve deposits for increased performance when dealing with piston deposits.
As it is, you have no idea what detergent package you're getting at any Top Tier station. So, yeah, I can absolutely see blending a detergent package to better suit the deposit characteristics of a GDI engine now that the majority of new engines have gone down the GDI path and advertising it as a competitive advantage like Costco is.
They likely get the fuel from local suppliers, but you can typically see their additive tanks next to the little office by the pumps. They have been using Lubrizol for their additives. I'm not sure if that is the case now. I've been using their fuel almost exclusively for several years now. I have no complaints. I also have nothing to show whether it's better or worse than anything else.OK-When is top tier not top tier?
Is this formulation really proprietary-or buying it from somebody else (think Kirkland oil) who is using it anyway?
Kirkland is a "brand", not an actual companyor buying it from somebody else (think Kirkland oil) who is using it anyway?
I understand that. They are buying the oil and slapping their name on it. Are they buying the additive (made for others-as well) and touting the marketing? Sorry if my post wasn't clear.Kirkland is a "brand", not an actual company
They use a proprietary additive that Lubrizol makes for them to their specs.They likely get the fuel from local suppliers, but you can typically see their additive tanks next to the little office by the pumps. They have been using Lubrizol for their additives. I'm not sure if that is the case now. I've been using their fuel almost exclusively for several years now. I have no complaints. I also have nothing to show whether it's better or worse than anything else.
Good points, but this has been discussed for decades. Certainly at least since the late 90s when I got. Y license.Going back to the AAA Fuel Quality Report from 2016: Yeah, there is a difference in Top Tier fuel brands when it comes to performance.
From the study, fuels 4, 5, and 6 were Top Tier fuels.
Fuel 6 exceled at reducing intake valve deposits, with fuels 4 and 5 having 4-7x more deposits. Not to worry, the non-Top Tier fuels had 57x more intake valve deposits, so all the Top Tier fuels were significantly better than the non-Top Tier fuels.
Looking at piston deposits, the opposite was true: Fuels 4 and 5 revealed less piston depots and fuel 6 had more.
All three are Top Tier fuels, but some detergent packages appear to trade performance on intake valve deposits for increased performance when dealing with piston deposits.
As it is, you have no idea what detergent package you're getting at any Top Tier station. So, yeah, I can absolutely see blending a detergent package to better suit the deposit characteristics of a GDI engine now that the majority of new engines have gone down the GDI path and advertising it as a competitive advantage like Costco is.
Me too. About all I have to show is the savings. But if we were to go back to 2007 and the car forum, people told me filling up at Costco? I don't deserve to drive a BMW. Amazing how at any given point in time, there are those who know everything, and are condescending when it comes to our habits, and how they compare to their own. Even today! Even here!They likely get the fuel from local suppliers, but you can typically see their additive tanks next to the little office by the pumps. They have been using Lubrizol for their additives. I'm not sure if that is the case now. I've been using their fuel almost exclusively for several years now. I have no complaints. I also have nothing to show whether it's better or worse than anything else.
Where I live Costco is always 10-30 cents less per gal than other stations. Are you saying $4.95/gal is more than other brands, or are you illustrating how much more you have to pay where you liveSo no wonder I paid $4.95/gal yesterday for regular when I filled up at Costco. Its really TOP tier.
And there was just a newspaper article touting the reduction in price in CA. Something like $,02/gal
So no wonder I paid $4.95/gal yesterday for regular when I filled up at Costco. Its really TOP tier.
And there was just a newspaper article touting the reduction in price in CA. Something like $,02/gal
Where I live Costco is always 10-30 cents less per gal than other stations. Are you saying $4.95/gal is more than other brands, or are you illustrating how much more you have to pay where you live
It's $2 less a gallon here.So no wonder I paid $4.95/gal yesterday for regular when I filled up at Costco. Its really TOP tier.
And there was just a newspaper article touting the reduction in price in CA. Something like $,02/gal