And what's wrong with that?Read like a top tier brochure, meh
Nothing it's just buzz words and marketing with a stock image. OP is putting too much thought into an advertisement.And what's wrong with that?
Considering the minute amount of the fuel used in those applications I dont think that the marketing is directed to them. You could draw your own conclusions but the economics of testing something for such a small segment isnt money well spent.It would be convoluted to address how additives help every single engine type. I don't see anyone saying how false the statement is that it will protect injectors on my antique with a carburetor. What if I used some of their gas to mix in a two stroke, how well would that clean my valves?
I stated that the pic included a direct injector out of sight on the right side of the pic. Wish I had taken a better pic. They have stated in the past that their recently new add pack keeps direct injectors clean. That was the reason for the new add pack. Can I prove it?...no but many engines will fire spark plugs multiple times on a combustion cycle. Maybe that's the reason MB doesn't have IVD problems.That does not look like a DI setup to me...I see no injectors, so I would assume they are in the manifold.
It's not inaccurate for whoever drives a DI Honda. Which also leads us to the question, who has the biggest problems with small displacement, TGDI fuel dilution?While that is definitely a direct injector, it almost looks like it’s positioned above the intake valve. Moral of the story, it looks like an inaccurate illustration more than anything