Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Did I assemble that logic train in a digestible manner?
Yes.
One thing: the term "flooding" has a negative ring to it.
As in, more than it can handle at that time.
Is that why you used that word?
(as far as I know you you do pick your words carefully)
I mean, coolant never gets any hotter than oil and oil being sprayed underneath the pistons heats up pretty quickly.
How fast does oil heat up in a crank journal?
IOW, I don't think coolant can overheat oil, not in temperature and not in time.
So I would like to call it sharing.
Coolant reaches engine parts that oil won't and vice versa.
Share the energy and the engine in total might/should/will see a shorter start-up period.
My engine has a small OEM coolant to oil heat exchanger.
Its located behind the oil filter base plate.
I'm sure the designers did the math.
IMO, increased flow due to thinner cold oil will help to share the energy too.
I can't see any drawbacks in these two things.
Or did I miss something?
Did I assemble that logic train in a digestible manner?
Yes.
One thing: the term "flooding" has a negative ring to it.
As in, more than it can handle at that time.
Is that why you used that word?
(as far as I know you you do pick your words carefully)
I mean, coolant never gets any hotter than oil and oil being sprayed underneath the pistons heats up pretty quickly.
How fast does oil heat up in a crank journal?
IOW, I don't think coolant can overheat oil, not in temperature and not in time.
So I would like to call it sharing.
Coolant reaches engine parts that oil won't and vice versa.
Share the energy and the engine in total might/should/will see a shorter start-up period.
My engine has a small OEM coolant to oil heat exchanger.
Its located behind the oil filter base plate.
I'm sure the designers did the math.
IMO, increased flow due to thinner cold oil will help to share the energy too.
I can't see any drawbacks in these two things.
Or did I miss something?