Interesting article.
https://garagewire.co.uk/news/must-...ombustion-and-electric-vehicles-report-finds/
https://garagewire.co.uk/news/must-...ombustion-and-electric-vehicles-report-finds/
CO2 and old cars
- Thread starter Trav
- Start date
producing old cars is zero co2 ?
apples to oranges.
clickbait article, there si only one option to be zero co2 footprint- to live like caveman...
Last edited:
I'm a little confused by the article--might be too early, too little coffee.
A barely-driven classic car emits very little CO2, ok.
A brand new car emits a huge amount due to assembly, ok.
So if we all just buy classic cars and don't drive them--then we don't need new cars?
Seems like the article is aiming at that we don't need to get rid of classic cars--they should be allowed to exist, as they're not doing anything just sitting there. But it seems to be thinking that for every classic that gets crushed, a new car would have to be made. Which I don't think is true, that new car was going to get made either way. We just don't need to get rid of cars that aren't being used (much).
A barely-driven classic car emits very little CO2, ok.
A brand new car emits a huge amount due to assembly, ok.
So if we all just buy classic cars and don't drive them--then we don't need new cars?
Seems like the article is aiming at that we don't need to get rid of classic cars--they should be allowed to exist, as they're not doing anything just sitting there. But it seems to be thinking that for every classic that gets crushed, a new car would have to be made. Which I don't think is true, that new car was going to get made either way. We just don't need to get rid of cars that aren't being used (much).
"The fully electric Polestar 2, for example, is said to create 26 tonnes of CO2 during its production process alone – an emissions figure that would take a typical classic car 46 years to match".
Does this include the CO2 it created when it was manufactured or just driving it for 46 years? I realize we put out more CO2 now but that's just the fact there are more things being manufactured now vs then because of population growth.
If you take an automotive plant from say 1960 and one from today and build 1000 cars which one would put out more C02?
Does this include the CO2 it created when it was manufactured or just driving it for 46 years? I realize we put out more CO2 now but that's just the fact there are more things being manufactured now vs then because of population growth.
If you take an automotive plant from say 1960 and one from today and build 1000 cars which one would put out more C02?
Before the invention of fire of course
Last edited:
The classic car was already built so replacing it with a polestar sets you back another 46 years in carbon footprint. And disposing of the classic releases more carbon.
So better stick with the car you have for as long as it lasts is the advice.
No, you guys are missing the point by a country mile. There is a movement in some countries to ban old cars and convince people to buy an EV.producing old cars is zero co2 ?
apples to oranges.
clickbait article, there si only one option to be zero co2 footprint- to live like caveman...
Eg one absolute climate fruitcake ruined a perfectly good Jag XKE convertible by converting it to EV which drives only a few times a year to save the planet.
Building a new EV produces more CO2 than a old classic produces in 46 years at 1200 miles a year. The old car is already here it does not need to be produced, the CO2 created from building it has already been absorbed by trees over many years so why tax it out of existence now.
I see Jetronic got it.
You can make the same case for any new car. It takes a lot of energy to manufacture a vehicle...
Personally, I try to keep cars alive by servicing them to the max. My cars tend to end up with family or friends.
Older cars are usually cheaper to insure and register, as well.
Personally, I try to keep cars alive by servicing them to the max. My cars tend to end up with family or friends.
Older cars are usually cheaper to insure and register, as well.
imho, rare non global thing.
old cars will be sorted by rusting and expensive fuels.
people will cry, if fuel will be just twice $ of today. it might be affordable to jump (expensive ev) ship.
Exactly.
Owen Lucas
$100 Site Donor 2023
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Messages
- 3,797
Speaking of gasses, if you have an older car it's probably best to cave a CO detector inside it.
Helping my buddy revive a 65 Chevy, I’ll tell you straight up, what little romance I had for the classics has further been wrecked. 15 minutes with that thing and I smell rotten. and the exhaust stink hangs around a long time. We forget how much those things send out the tailpipe, even ones well-tuned. For some reason, I still have fondness for the smell of diesel at sunrise. But unleaded, no.
Nick1994
$100 site donor 2024
Apples to oranges.
So we should just give up driving and keep around antique cars for the few miles we do drive?
So we should just give up driving and keep around antique cars for the few miles we do drive?
Often, the only difference between medicine & poison is dosage.
Are they somehow worse than the average small engine? My riding mower doesn't stink when it runs, and I don't recall a mower that did unless it had something wrong with it like the choke is stuck on.
Very similar? Just more of it. I’d wager my mower runs cleaner than his 65 and my older stuff when I had them.
Rose colored glasses are a hell of a thing.
Lead. I've seen studies about crimes rate increase, with amount of cars on roads.
One study suggested iq decrease few points.
Similar threads
