Originally Posted By: dlundblad
Originally Posted By: Nickdfresh
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: 4WD
Sure - they have research teams to allocate - that runs from PhD's to the taxi driver on the PoP test plan. OEM's with different paths they try to follow ... Agencies and regulations ...
Oil companies are stuck in the middle of conflicts over OEM specs and the US EPA ... They have to decide which rabbit to chase - don't seem it's BMW or Chrysler in the case of Mobil (for now) ... Doubt they would buy anything regardless...
Companies are testing for oils that will be spec'd for upcoming engines - playing to many standards in the USA - but what if the EPA would of continued to clamp down only on fuel economy and emissions ... (Election was assumed wrong).
Don't think the EPA can't walk on any standard they want to with certain folks in power.
The top 4 (or more) oil companies produce aviation and industrial lubricants - they can all meet OEM 'standards' if they have a reason to do so ...
So which oil would I pick ? Neither - don't have anything to put uber wide range multi-vis oil in ...
Man I have no idea what you talking about.
Mobil 1 0W40 does not have LL-01. Plain and simple. Other do have, plain and simple.
EPA does not have to do anything with the fact that Mobil 1 does not have LL-01, which is now most stringent oil spec. for gasoline engines. Mobil 1 IMO has issues with GTL base that they just moved to and that is reason for no LL-01. That is why Mobil 1 still offers VISOM version in Europe.
Apparently you don't know what you're talking about either, because you keep posting the same wrong speculative garbage over and over. The Visom Mobil 1 in North America dropped the LL-01 prior to it becoming GTL and you were told this in a previous post, you been posting this tripe over and over...
You beat me to it.
It's not the only topic he posits his speculations as some sort of fact...
Originally Posted By: Nickdfresh
Originally Posted By: edyvw
Originally Posted By: 4WD
Sure - they have research teams to allocate - that runs from PhD's to the taxi driver on the PoP test plan. OEM's with different paths they try to follow ... Agencies and regulations ...
Oil companies are stuck in the middle of conflicts over OEM specs and the US EPA ... They have to decide which rabbit to chase - don't seem it's BMW or Chrysler in the case of Mobil (for now) ... Doubt they would buy anything regardless...
Companies are testing for oils that will be spec'd for upcoming engines - playing to many standards in the USA - but what if the EPA would of continued to clamp down only on fuel economy and emissions ... (Election was assumed wrong).
Don't think the EPA can't walk on any standard they want to with certain folks in power.
The top 4 (or more) oil companies produce aviation and industrial lubricants - they can all meet OEM 'standards' if they have a reason to do so ...
So which oil would I pick ? Neither - don't have anything to put uber wide range multi-vis oil in ...
Man I have no idea what you talking about.
Mobil 1 0W40 does not have LL-01. Plain and simple. Other do have, plain and simple.
EPA does not have to do anything with the fact that Mobil 1 does not have LL-01, which is now most stringent oil spec. for gasoline engines. Mobil 1 IMO has issues with GTL base that they just moved to and that is reason for no LL-01. That is why Mobil 1 still offers VISOM version in Europe.
Apparently you don't know what you're talking about either, because you keep posting the same wrong speculative garbage over and over. The Visom Mobil 1 in North America dropped the LL-01 prior to it becoming GTL and you were told this in a previous post, you been posting this tripe over and over...
You beat me to it.
It's not the only topic he posits his speculations as some sort of fact...