Originally Posted By: LucasDK
My Toyota Corolla from 1991 requires a SE, SF or SG quality oil. The question is, if I can lower my standards and just go for the cheapest as I wont need a SN quality oil.
I rarely see the SEA donut here. Just SAE xyz written in letters on the backside.
Lucas
Newer classification oils address a issue with it's predecessor, say SG oil in a 1991 Yota, or maybe was a '91 Caddy North Star(was NS even developed yet?)... Anyway once a oil is deemed as having a issue, usually ALL mfgr require the newer oil in in their vehicles, whether their engines were suffering or not... There is ZERO chance all engines suddenly needed SH oils(though they well may benefit)... It's just simpler for mfgr to require the latest oils...
The 1956 Ford owners manual says MM(SB) or MS(SC) may be used, PQIA timeline claims SB is harmful in any engine after 1951... Note oil classifications SA, SB & SC did not exist before 1967, yet their predecessors are never mentioned these days... Also note there is a disclaimer stating to always refer to your owners manual... Meaning some mfgr were saying the earlier oils were OK in their latest engines...
http://www.pqiamerica.com/TIMELINE 5-23-2013rv23.pdf
SD oils were developed because SC oils were oxidizing in the newer engines that used a 195* thermostat, wasn't that 1968 models suddenly needed SE... This problem was happening approx three years prior, just took the oil co that long to address it...
After saying all this would I search out a earlier oil for a older Lo-Po engine that extra zinc was meaningless? Nope, nada, zero...