- Joined
- Feb 22, 2021
- Messages
- 2,002
My own preference is sitting in well maintained Boeing or Airbus with a competent crew.
If you crash, even 707 wings will break.
Never had any airframe, or engine issues on the Airbus ( 22 years ).
The engines on the A320 start fast also, unlike the ones on the 737/A220. Drives me nuts getting stuck on the gate waiting for them to get their engines started after pushback and call for taxi clearance ( block us from behind our gate ). More ramp congestion at peak times I notice.
Edit: reminds me of the myth Airbus had weaker tails ( and wings I guess ) after the pilot did something pilots are not supposed to do - full , opposite, rudder reversals which snapped the tail off.
It’s a myth any Boeing tail could withstand that because no aircraft manufacturer tests the breaking point of the tail, unlike the wing spar ( mandatory for certification ).
Tails are not designed for full rudder reversals.
If you crash, even 707 wings will break.
Never had any airframe, or engine issues on the Airbus ( 22 years ).
The engines on the A320 start fast also, unlike the ones on the 737/A220. Drives me nuts getting stuck on the gate waiting for them to get their engines started after pushback and call for taxi clearance ( block us from behind our gate ). More ramp congestion at peak times I notice.
Edit: reminds me of the myth Airbus had weaker tails ( and wings I guess ) after the pilot did something pilots are not supposed to do - full , opposite, rudder reversals which snapped the tail off.
It’s a myth any Boeing tail could withstand that because no aircraft manufacturer tests the breaking point of the tail, unlike the wing spar ( mandatory for certification ).
Tails are not designed for full rudder reversals.
Last edited: