Originally Posted By: zpinch
You know if dexos was a product, and required for a vehicle, they would have to provide it free of charge. I would never buy a GM vehicle because of this (how long will it be before other OEM's issue their own license?). Oil producers that wish to display the dexos™ logo, get to pay GM a fee of $1000.00 per product licence. An additional charge of $0.36 per gallon also applies. This is not a bad pay-day for the automaker. I wonder how long it will take for other manufacturers to catch on and issue their own license? Customers will inevitably pay the extra cost.
Original (2010) General Motors statement
Don’t be fooled by oils with claims on the back label such as "meets," "complies with" or "is approved for use with the dexos™ specification. Look alikes or unlicensed products that don’t display the dexos™ icon and trademark, on the front label simply don’t comply with the high performance and quality standards of dexos™.
Using engine oil other than authentic dexos™ licensed products could result in damage that is not covered under warranty.
Nothing but a GM oil shakedown.
GM also says API SN can be used. They want dexos because it does have a higher standard than API and requires a extra label. Anyone using the dexos label without authorization is committing fraud.
I like dexos, it makes buying oil for the average know little consumer a whole lot easier ad being licensed does provide some assurance of minimum quality.
Some of you guys crack me up. No one complains about the transmission licensed fluid, in fact once dex III was no longer licensed some were worried that some "meets or exceeds" might not be up to snuff now no licensing of the product is needed.
What about API SN does Amsoil even have that license/approval? Come on, that alone would cover a lot of potential problems.
No, they do not. As far as i can tell only 1 oil has any real approvals.
Instead of saying Amsoil should get these licenses and approvals like most others who are producing engine oil you go on an anti GM rant. You have completely lost the plot here.
This meets or exceeds bovine excrement is close to fraud IMHO. The label sure looks like a let spec label but in reality it is close to fraudulent as it gets. Amsoils legal team must have worked overtime wording that so carefully that they don't get sued.
It should say. We only recommend it for all the specs listed but we didn't bother to license them. We are a good company, trust us to do the right thing if something goes afoul with your engine warranty.
Would you buy Travs engine oil with a label that reads.
It meets this spec and that spec, trust me i know it does but i cant be bothered to license any of it. This is why i can sell at such low prices.
You would tell me to go $hit in my hat but when Amsoil does it AND charges a premium you worship it
They sell a premium product at a premium price, no one disputes the quality of the product but there is no reason other than extra profit on their part for not getting licenses/approvals.
Exactly what you accuse GM of doing. I for one don't mind paying an extra .10-.25 a qt for quality assurance. Trust is good, certification is better.
Hey out of warranty no problem whatsoever. Amsoil is a good company with premium products and IMO trustworthy but in todays world where every i is dotted and every t crossed when it comes to warranty you just cant take that sort of a risk and you shouldn't have to.
JMHO and