A few questions about Jeep Wranglers...

Status
Not open for further replies.
1: He lives in Florida: heater will probably be used 3 times...

2: He's keeping his pickup: he probably won't have to haul a lot in the Jeep, very often...

3. The 4.0 is probably a better engine for the street and more fun to drive than a 2.5 with auto...

4. Not everyone who buys a Wrangler puts 35" Super Swampers on aftermarket wheels on it, nor do they often drive the Rubicon Trail, etc.

So... Buy your Jeep, change out all the fluids and ENJOY!
 
Originally Posted By: Norm Olt
1: He lives in Florida: heater will probably be used 3 times...

2: He's keeping his pickup: he probably won't have to haul a lot in the Jeep, very often...

3. The 4.0 is probably a better engine for the street and more fun to drive than a 2.5 with auto...

4. Not everyone who buys a Wrangler puts 35" Super Swampers on aftermarket wheels on it, nor do they often drive the Rubicon Trail, etc.

So... Buy your Jeep, change out all the fluids and ENJOY!



THIS x2!!!
thumbsup2.gif
 
Guys need to stop talking about Wranglers, making me miss mine. Turning radius was amazing, view ability was great too, all those windows you can maneuver like crazy!
 
Originally Posted By: Nick R
You don't want a 2.5L Wrangler. This is why.




Might have my answer on whether the 2.5 Wrangler or 1.3 Samurai was slower

http://youtu.be/9Ni7FhJg3Lc

...but I got bored watching and went and made a sandwich....they were still trying to get to 60 when I returned
 
I appreciate all of the replies. I can tell, especially after a test drive, that a 4 cylinder & automatic will definitely not be for me.Plus, I think I may have found a great deal on a 1994 Wrangler SE Sport w/a 4.0L.
 
Originally Posted By: Noshow13
I appreciate all of the replies. I can tell, especially after a test drive, that a 4 cylinder & automatic will definitely not be for me.Plus, I think I may have found a great deal on a 1994 Wrangler SE Sport w/a 4.0L.



Ehhhhhh. I wouldn't go with the 94. They still used Leaf springs in those iirc. I'd try to go for a TJ with Coil springs.
 
The TJ was a fantastic Jeep. The new ones are JUNK IMHO. Built like mini vans.

If your looking at getting a used jeep and want to use it LIKE a jeep, get a newer TJ like the 01.

Also, the 4.0 engine is one of the best engines ever built. It's up there with Ford's Modular engines when it comes to build quality and durability.

I miss mine!
 
^ Nothing wrong with the JK. Yeah, they used a minivan engine for a while, but they're more capable than a TJ out of the box, and seem to hold up just as well.
 
Originally Posted By: Noshow13
I've been looking at a few Jeep Wranglers, for a second vehicle, & thought I would ask a few questions here. I have never owned a Wrangler & I am not real familiar with them. I am looking at a 2001 4.0L I6 5spd w/ 79,xxx on it, I am also going to look at a 1998 2.5L I4 auto w/ 83,xxx miles on it. I test drove the 2001 & like it a lot, I am gonna try to test drive the 1998 tomorrow. Any opinions about these Wranglers, or anything I should look for? Thank you in advance.
Get the 01 with the 6cyl...it's one of the best year TJs as it has the tough (but noisy to some) NV3550 5spd trans. Some Jeep guys get hung up on the D44 vs D35 rearend. If you find one with a D35, don't write the Jeep off...the rearend can be easily swapped.
 
Originally Posted By: Popinski
Originally Posted By: Jim Spahr
My dau. has a 1998 Jeep Wrangler with the 2.5L four and 5 speed manual trans and stock tires. This is her daily driver. Soft top with roll up windows. The 2.5L may get 17 to 19 mpg on the highway. It doesn't have a lot of power on hills and would not be good for towing anything heavy. It has been reliable transportation with only routine repairs like water pump,TPS, and alt. I would rec. the 4.0L six esp. if you get an automatic trans. The gain in HP is far better and the loss in MPG is minimal. Also if you are going to add big tires, tow a lot, and drive in the mountains, you would want the six cyl. If you look on the net, many have stuffed a V8 engine in the Wrangler. I have seen the new Hemi, the Chevy LSX, and several Ford V8's, but that is a major operation not for the novice to tackle.


I know someone who has a 4-banger jeep. He said he has to keep the pedal to the metal on the highway and it barely reaches 70 MPH.
That was my experience with a bone stock 2.5/5spd equipped 95 YJ. With larger tires, the 2.5 becomes just about useless unless you rev the [censored] out of it or put deep gears in the axles. The later DOHC 2.4 4cyl Jeep used in the last few years of the TJ is much better than the 2.5 if you must have a 4cyl Jeep.
 
Originally Posted By: Nick R
Originally Posted By: Noshow13
I appreciate all of the replies. I can tell, especially after a test drive, that a 4 cylinder & automatic will definitely not be for me.Plus, I think I may have found a great deal on a 1994 Wrangler SE Sport w/a 4.0L.



Ehhhhhh. I wouldn't go with the 94. They still used Leaf springs in those iirc. I'd try to go for a TJ with Coil springs.
What's wrong with leafs? They are cheap to lift and they perform well. The YJs ride a bit "rougher" than TJs on the street, but still, I'd buy a YJ again if I could find one in the Chicago area that wasn't rusted too [censored]. Road salt and YJs don't mix. lol
 
Originally Posted By: meep
nothing wrong with leaf sprung. solid, reliable, all the way around. what's your budget?


I had a '90 YJ (4.2L/Manual) that I recently sold and replaced with a '05 TJ Rubicon. The difference in handling was night and day. Both are bone stock, no modifications and the YJ drove like a log truck (I've driven log trucks before
grin.gif
). The TJ in comparison drives like a Cadillac. There is a night and day difference between the two platforms in every aspect.

Leaf springs had their time...leave them in vets and heavy duty pickups, I'll keep the coils in my Wrangler.
laugh.gif
 
Thanks for all the input, & I am still looking for a Jeep.Hopefully I will be getting one soon, leaning toward a TJ.
 
I drove my dau.s 1998 Wrangler with the 2.5L four/5 speed manual and it ran well. I checked the gas mileage and it got a whopping 18.8 MPG in combination driving. I believe that the 4.0L six gets that or almost that much mpg if you drive carefully....and don't have the 39 inch rock crawler tires on it. I put new Wagner Thermoquiet pads on the front and it was a job. The Chrysler designed calipers were not user friendly. Requires tiny, flimsy stainless steel clips on the wear edge of the pads. Works great, but a pain to install.
 
I have a 98 TJ with 102,000 miles and it has never been a daily driver-I bought it with around 65,000 about 8 years ago, and it is a fun top-down vehicle car in summer, and a serious have-to-get-there-in-snow vehicle in winter. It is a 5 speed, and a 4.0 six-a great combination IMO. It has the dana 35 and I have no issues with it, with 31x10.5 All-terrain T/A's and the original 3.07 rear. Jeeps are bricks aerodynamically, so do not expect good gas mileage no matter what engine or trans you have in it. The 4.0 is about as bulletproof as any engine you will find, and we have done little more than rebuilt the starter, replaced the TPS (don't get crazy with the hose when cleaning the engine) and the crank sensor (PITA) it on a new Sunrider top from Bestop (nice because on a decent day you can 'fold back' the top without having to drop the entire top). I change oil every year (usually less than 3000 miles, full synthetic), and upgraded the stereo/CD/speakers with a good system (loud is important since it is not a quiet vehicle to begin with). The back seat is out and i installed a 'trunk', which secures items in a secure, hidden compartment for safety. It is very easy to work on, and parts are not crazy expensive or hard to get. If I had to use it as a daily driver, I might not like it very much, but as a dependable, fun and 'different' mode of transportation, I doubt you could find anything as adaptable as it to all situations. The resale value of these is incredible, I got mine for around $7500 in 2003 and it would still get easily over $5500 today.

BTW, on Jeep forums, the ones prior to the TJ (1997) with the 'square' headlights are not looked upon favorably by purists-I like the ride compared to the earlier leaf-springed versions, more civilize yet off-road (get quick disconnects for the sway bar) and it can do anything better (+) than earlier versions.

Just a great, basic vehicle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom