A brainstorm in WM today

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
01.gif



I wonder how many computer keyboards they wear out in a months time.....
 
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
01.gif



I wonder how many computer keyboards they wear out in a months time.....

I know,right?
 
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
01.gif



I wonder how many computer keyboards they wear out in a months time.....


150_crazy_computer_guy.gif
 
Originally Posted By: KD0AXS
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
01.gif



I wonder how many computer keyboards they wear out in a months time.....


150_crazy_computer_guy.gif


WOW! I laughed so hard at this it brought tears to my eyes!
lol.gif
crackmeup2.gif
X100!
 
Guys, I write for a living so I do wear keyboards out. That cartoon, though, will be sticking in my mind for a long while. I can't says it's that bad in reality, but sometimes it feels that way.
 
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
After reading their missives above, I get the sinking feeling that my choice of filter, oil, and OCI may NOT be the ultimate in awesomeness that I was convinced it was. Thanks for ruining my self-induced sense of smugness, guys...
 
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
After reading their missives above, I get the sinking feeling that my choice of filter, oil, and OCI may NOT be the ultimate in awesomeness that I was convinced it was. Thanks for ruining my self-induced sense of smugness, guys...


"Awsomeness" is an ever-changing goal, my friend, according to our level of learning at the time. And, for all you know, our missives above are just our own self-induced smugness of the moment (though it really does seem to make sense). If you hang around here long enough, and are open to new thinking, the total destruction of our momentary smugness is a fairly regular thing. And it's probably a good thing.

Anyway, why don't you tell us about your oil, filter and OCI so that we may fully destroy your false sense of well-being. ( : < ) YNK, we might be able to build it up a little too.
 
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
After reading their missives above, I get the sinking feeling that my choice of filter, oil, and OCI may NOT be the ultimate in awesomeness that I was convinced it was. Thanks for ruining my self-induced sense of smugness, guys...


Since all these long drawn out discussions (regardless of massive test data or not) always seem to boil down to "it really doesn't matter what oil or oil filter you use as long as you change the oil and filter often", then I guess the "ultimate in awesomeness" choice of oil and filter is the one that YOU think is the best setup for YOU.
smile.gif


Based on this conclusion, it's time to remove the oil and oil filter forums from BITOG.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
After reading their missives above, I get the sinking feeling that my choice of filter, oil, and OCI may NOT be the ultimate in awesomeness that I was convinced it was. Thanks for ruining my self-induced sense of smugness, guys...


Since all these long drawn out discussions (regardless of massive test data or not) always seem to boil down to "it really doesn't matter what oil or oil filter you use as long as you change the oil and filter often", then I guess the "ultimate in awesomeness" choice of oil and filter is the one that YOU think is the best setup for YOU.
smile.gif


Based on this conclusion, it's time to remove the oil and oil filter forums from BITOG.
laugh.gif


If you do that,where will Kev-Guy post about his beloved OCOD?
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Anyway, why don't you tell us about your oil, filter and OCI so that we may fully destroy your false sense of well-being.
2003 Mercury Marauder. Aftermarket Eaton supercharger. Pennzoil Platinum 5w30. Motorcraft FL820S. OCI - 5000 miles or one year. Car is only driven occasionally, but is fully warmed up each time.
 
Originally Posted By: KD0AXS
Originally Posted By: Kruse
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Why is it everytime I read DNEWTON3 and JIM ALLEN'S responses,my IQ numbers jump double digits?
01.gif



I wonder how many computer keyboards they wear out in a months time.....


150_crazy_computer_guy.gif




OK - that hits home kinda close.

And that is DARN FUNNY!!! I cannot speak for Jim, but I certainly suffer from keyboard diarrhea at times ...
I laughed really hard out loud at that one!
 
Originally Posted By: RF Overlord
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Anyway, why don't you tell us about your oil, filter and OCI so that we may fully destroy your false sense of well-being.
2003 Mercury Marauder. Aftermarket Eaton supercharger. Pennzoil Platinum 5w30. Motorcraft FL820S. OCI - 5000 miles or one year. Car is only driven occasionally, but is fully warmed up each time.


Truely nothing much to pick at your well-being over there. ( : < ) I think you could probably run a 2 year interval (even at 10K miles) but given you have the 'charger, and maybe when you play with that car you really PLAY, that's probably something to be verified with a used oil analysis first (if you haven't already). The filter... I'd run an Ultra, or some other premium filter but the MC is fine the way you are doing things now. If you extended the miles, a Full Synthetic filter would be safer (not that a cellulose filter is unsafe). In a high performance realm, I think it's more important to try and avoid a bypass situation and a synthetic, high capacity filter helps in that regard. Isn't that why the dedicated HP filters used to have such low efficiency so they could deliver high flow? A syn filter can deliver both, along with higher capacity.
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Since all these long drawn out discussions (regardless of massive test data or not) always seem to boil down to "it really doesn't matter what oil or oil filter you use as long as you change the oil and filter often", then I guess the "ultimate in awesomeness" choice of oil and filter is the one that YOU think is the best setup for YOU.
smile.gif


Based on this conclusion, it's time to remove the oil and oil filter forums from BITOG.
laugh.gif


+1 Zee! Lately especially reading the oil filter board, I come to the same conclusion. Might as well put a notice at the top of the OF board that says, 'choice of oil filter unimportant/immaterial' and shut down it down. Obviously, I don't agree with that conclusion, but after reading many repetitive reply posts on multiple threads it does seems to have come that here (OF board) recently.

But here's one for ya, I don't believe that UOA is the ultimate proof of oil filter efficacy.
shocked.gif
Just as some poo poo the GM study of oil filter efficacy, I want to see long term studies (more than one) proving that UOA is a valid test of oil filter efficacy. Since reading Bitog over time I now believe UOA is best used in some trending data of oil used, and observing any incursion of unwanted fluids/materials like antifreeze into the oil/combustion chamber. To me the only truly valid method to measure engine wear is engine tear down after long term use.

So, I'll continue to use what I consider to be a quality filter based on my oci, with value being a consideration in that decision. Doesn't necessarily have to be the most expensive or finest filtration filter, but I won't just indescriminately pick just any oil filter either with no consideration to it's construction and efficiency specs.
 
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
Truely nothing much to pick at your well-being over there. ( : < ) I think you could probably run a 2 year interval (even at 10K miles)
Nice save, Jim...
grin2.gif
The last OC on that car was in July of 2011, but it's only been driven about 1100 miles since then, and is under cover for the winter. I intend to change the oil again in the spring when I recommission it.

Originally Posted By: sayjac
I'll continue to use what I consider to be a quality filter based on my oci, with value being a consideration in that decision.
I like the way you think.
 
Originally Posted By: sayjac
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Since all these long drawn out discussions (regardless of massive test data or not) always seem to boil down to "it really doesn't matter what oil or oil filter you use as long as you change the oil and filter often", then I guess the "ultimate in awesomeness" choice of oil and filter is the one that YOU think is the best setup for YOU.
smile.gif


Based on this conclusion, it's time to remove the oil and oil filter forums from BITOG.
laugh.gif


+1 Zee! Lately especially reading the oil filter board, I come to the same conclusion. Might as well put a notice at the top of the OF board that says, 'choice of oil filter unimportant/immaterial' and shut down it down. Obviously, I don't agree with that conclusion, but after reading many repetitive reply posts on multiple threads it does seems to have come that here (OF board) recently.

But here's one for ya, I don't believe that UOA is the ultimate proof of oil filter efficacy.
shocked.gif
Just as some poo poo the GM study of oil filter efficacy, I want to see long term studies (more than one) proving that UOA is a valid test of oil filter efficacy. Since reading Bitog over time I now believe UOA is best used in some trending data of oil used, and observing any incursion of unwanted fluids/materials like antifreeze into the oil/combustion chamber. To me the only truly valid method to measure engine wear is engine tear down after long term use.

So, I'll continue to use what I consider to be a quality filter based on my oci, with value being a consideration in that decision. Doesn't necessarily have to be the most expensive or finest filtration filter, but I won't just indescriminately pick just any oil filter either with no consideration to it's construction and efficiency specs.
But where would we post all the junk OCOD photos? My strategy is-Puro Classics or clones on the relatives' cars & old engines that aren't driven much & changed every year or so at 3-5K or whatever, silicone ADBV Pure One or MC on the sideways mounted filter on the Jeep 4.0 (which really benefits from them noise-wise), and premium long-life filters on the xB & Ram that get extended OCIs.
 
Originally Posted By: bullwinkle
But where would we post all the junk OCOD photos? My strategy is-Puro Classics or clones on the relatives' cars & old engines that aren't driven much & changed every year or so at 3-5K or whatever, silicone ADBV Pure One or MC on the sideways mounted filter on the Jeep 4.0 (which really benefits from them noise-wise), and premium long-life filters on the xB & Ram that get extended OCIs.


Common-sense approach (except for the Fram derangement syndrome , OCOD comment).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom