Originally Posted By: dagreek
...If you read the paper that Richard Widman wrote, who actually did a chemical analysis of GL-4 MTF and 5W30 Motor oil, he said their components are very similar with a few friction modifiers added to the GL-4. He also states that motor oil classifies as GL-3 and GL-4 in gear protection.
http://www.widman.biz/uploads/Transaxle_oil.pdf...
I guess I missed the paragraph or chart where Richard showed an actual chemical analysis of GL-4 MTF's and 5W30 Motor oils.
Originally Posted By: Richard Wittman
The original target audience for this paper was my group of friends in the Corvair world, but it applies to all cars and is particularly important for all classic cars...
While his write-up contains much useful information, the above was his target audience, and his article's main thrust was to differentiate between GL-4 and GL-5 gear oils.
A lubricant tested for GL-X protection levels is usually tested in an FZG machine and I have never seen any motor oil tested for GL-X equivalency in an FZG machine.
Motor oils were specified in earlier transmissions because because there were no application specific or Dedicated MTF's available.
Later, Texaco and Shell developed their line of Dedicated MTF's for GM, Chrysler, and Ford as factory fills in synchronized MT's.
Quote:
He also states that motor oil classifies as GL-3 and GL-4 in gear protection.
Again let me state:
Quote:
A lubricant tested for GL-X protection levels is usually tested in an FZG machine and I have never seen any motor oil tested for GL-X equivalency in an FZG machine.
When selecting an MTF, there are three main considerations:
1) Viscosity,
2) Anti-Wear (AW) additives to qualify for a GL-4 protection level,
3) Proper friction modification (FM) for smooth synchronizer assembly operation.