dnewton3
Staff member
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
I prefer to OCI based on facts and proven, repeatable data.
I agree, which I why I took part in the Pennzoil UOA program and followed up with my other vehicles. I wanted to be sure my routine was good based on data for my usage pattern. When extending OCI's that is the only way to go. Get data from the vehicle in question and extend or shorten the OCI based on that. Because X amount of miles from #1 oil works for Joe Bitoger in the heartland doesn't mean it is going to work for John Doe in the concrete jungle.
Most certainly true.
I do not, in any manner, advocate greatly extended OCIs without first a growing escalation of UOAs of longer and longer trials, allowing data to drive the decisions. And UOAs, while great tools, are not foolproof. They are much more trustworthy when paired with PCs, visual and tactile observations, etc.
No one should blindly just run really long OFCIs; that's asking for trouble.
But those of us whom practice a very broad and informed maintenance program can find great benefit from them.
However, it's important to note that slightly over-running a planned OCI (say running to 7k miles when 5k miles was your plan) is not a reason to panic or trade off the vehicle. Most any decent lube and filter can easily outpace the OEM OFCI.
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
I prefer to OCI based on facts and proven, repeatable data.
I agree, which I why I took part in the Pennzoil UOA program and followed up with my other vehicles. I wanted to be sure my routine was good based on data for my usage pattern. When extending OCI's that is the only way to go. Get data from the vehicle in question and extend or shorten the OCI based on that. Because X amount of miles from #1 oil works for Joe Bitoger in the heartland doesn't mean it is going to work for John Doe in the concrete jungle.
Most certainly true.
I do not, in any manner, advocate greatly extended OCIs without first a growing escalation of UOAs of longer and longer trials, allowing data to drive the decisions. And UOAs, while great tools, are not foolproof. They are much more trustworthy when paired with PCs, visual and tactile observations, etc.
No one should blindly just run really long OFCIs; that's asking for trouble.
But those of us whom practice a very broad and informed maintenance program can find great benefit from them.
However, it's important to note that slightly over-running a planned OCI (say running to 7k miles when 5k miles was your plan) is not a reason to panic or trade off the vehicle. Most any decent lube and filter can easily outpace the OEM OFCI.