wemay
Site Donor 2023
Thanks for sharing, OP. Very impressive.
Many people actually. Some people like V6 and V8 because they are smooth, and torquey, despite them never use more than 100hp in the 400hp engine. EV would easily give those people what they want and throw in the charge at home and reduced maintenance.40k for a cuv with 273 miles of optimistic range that'll likely be 200 on the highway when going 80+ with the rest of traffic? Who's asking for these electric things.
So which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV? To answer your question, I have spun out a Mazda 3 and a Mustang on roads that were just wet from dew. All nannies engaged.The post below was about seeing crashed EV in the rain. Nothing about doing 100 mph in the rain. ICE cars are going to crash doing 100 in the rain just as well. If you hit the gas on wet roads in a car with all the safety nannies is it going to let you spin out?
No idea. You're saying a 600 hp EV is going to lose control if the driver floors it at 40mph or whatever? So all the traction stability stuff doesn't work? Maybe someone with an EV can answer. Would it depend on how sophisticated the T/C is?So which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV?
Plenty of Tesla owners can confirm this.EVs easily overdrive all of those safety features. 100 mph is easily achieved on neighborhood streets by cars that can accelerate to 60 in 3 seconds. Stability control, traction control and anti-lock brakes are not going to save you from entering somebody's living room in that scenario.
Is there a reputable study showing that EV's have a higher crash rate?So which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV? To answer your question, I have spun out a Mazda 3 and a Mustang on roads that were just wet from dew. All nannies engaged.
Perhaps the driver comes into the equation?So which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV? To answer your question, I have spun out a Mazda 3 and a Mustang on roads that were just wet from dew. All nannies engaged.
I'm saying that I've proven in more pedestrian cars that with enough ambition your right foot can overwhelm traction & stability control and you can indeed get them sideways in the road. None of the electronic stuff can save you completely. You'd have to almost purposely be trying to crash in something with 120 horsepower, but it would be very easy to overwhelm the nannies in a Tesla Plaid which can be going 100 mph in three blinks of an eye. You've got to have a lot more runway to get an old Corolla up to 100, which gives you much more opportunity to rethink what you're doing.No idea. You're saying a 600 hp EV is going to lose control if the driver floors it at 40mph or whatever? So all the traction stability stuff doesn't work? Maybe someone with an EV can answer. Would it depend on how sophisticated the T/C is?
I would say the car with the never good OE tiresSo which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV? To answer your question, I have spun out a Mazda 3 and a Mustang on roads that were just wet from dew. All nannies engaged.
My point stands when you compare it to a Corolla. Easier to build speed quickly and overestimate your capabilities.@Wylie6G72 The post I was responding to that started this sidetrack said EV 300hp and instant torque and economy car in the rain, not sure where 600hp and 100mph came from? The thread is about small "economy" EVs not a Plaid. The implication to me was it's easier to crash an EV driving normally in the rain. So how did you spin the Mazda?
The one with the worse driver.So which is more likely to crash in the rain, a 120 horsepower Corolla or a 600 horsepower EV? To answer your question, I have spun out a Mazda 3 and a Mustang on roads that were just wet from dew. All nannies engaged.
Yeah.Is there a reputable study showing that EV's have a higher crash rate?
I'm curious as well. Teslas sales have slid significantly in the USA. Rivian posted that they expect a 56 percent increase in sales with the new R2 accounting for 20k units. Elon said he thinks that Tesla sales will be down significantly this year as he expects cybercab production to ramp up.it’s going to be interesting to see in 2028 what the 2027 numbers for EV sales in the US show because we will have a full years worth of sales of all these Toyota options, the upcoming Honda EVs that aren’t GMs, Jeep Recon, Rivian R2, new Bolt, etc in addition to all the existing ones already for sale.
My guess is Tesla will still be #1 and whoever puts the most cash on the hood will be #2.
I say this because even now Teslas are full price although you can maybe get $1-2K off an inventory unit while everyone else is discounting new EVs by 10K or more.
Definitely a lot more options which is great. Tesla still probably the best but their image has been tarnished.it’s going to be interesting to see in 2028 what the 2027 numbers for EV sales in the US show because we will have a full years worth of sales of all these Toyota options, the upcoming Honda EVs that aren’t GMs, Jeep Recon, Rivian R2, new Bolt, etc in addition to all the existing ones already for sale.
My guess is Tesla will still be #1 and whoever puts the most cash on the hood will be #2.
I say this because even now Teslas are full price although you can maybe get $1-2K off an inventory unit while everyone else is discounting new EVs by 10K or more.
No one needs more than 200 hp. It's dangerous to have that much power without a special and expensive high power driver's license stamp.I do think it's funny that high horsepower EVs are seen as a negative. I don't buy slow cars. If it's not fast, I don't want it. That went for ICE too. If it wasn't fast or I couldn't make it fast, I didn't consider it. Of course horsepower is easier to come by in an EV.