Rental Car Review: 2026 Camry

Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
6,333
Location
SEC Country
Rented a 2026 Camry for a week in Oregon, turned it in yesterday morning. Drove around 800 miles.

The first thing you'll notice about this vehicle that it is low. Not quite as low as my co-worker's Model 3, but pretty low nonetheless. It felt like a significant stepdown even compared to my wife's Mach-E. I'm used to driving an F-150 (Lightning) that I have to step up into, so it's a pretty big departure.

Sitting down into the driver's seat, with the seat all the way down and back there is enough head room and legroom for Bubba sized adults like me, i.e., 6'7", 310 lbs. The tilt column not going up as far as it could is a common annoyance with recent Toyota vehicles, there is still space above the column for it to go up further, but the travel is limited. Nevertheless I was able to make it work acceptably, but would have preferred the column go up a little more, and it appears that it would be physically possible. I took a picture of this.

Upon starting the car, there is a bevvy of noises that would be more befitting of a child's toy, but I found that on subsequent starts that if I buckled my seatbelt before turning the car on, this minor irritation was avoided.

The driving dynamics of this Camry were better than expected. The ride was very compliant, but it didn't have excessive body roll and seemed to handle sharp mountain road curves well as well as off-camber corners and so forth. It also never bottomed out despite being so low and we took it on a lot of back country roads with very sharp turns and abrupt elevation changes, hairpins and so forth.

I reset the mileage meter before driving out of the rental car lot, just to see how it would do. With gas above $5 per gallon I was a little more attuned than usual to how my mileage was. I'm used to hybrids that get better mileage around town. This Camry actually gets better mileage on the highway. Even doing 75 on the Interstate, on flat ground the mileage went above 51. I noticed EV mode activation on the freeway at speeds of up to mid-70s MPH wise. Mileage tended to go below 50 around town to around the high 40s. The lowest it got was in the mid-40s going from Hood River, Oregon up to Timberline Lodge which is about a 5500 foot climb from 500 feet MSL to around 6000 and mostly uphill the whole way, but the mileage recovered to around 50 when we came back down to the valley level on the Portland side. This car does seem to do engine braking pretty aggressively coming down a steep grade if you set the cruise control, which my wife didn't like from a noise perspective, but I liked from a driving perspective of not having to ride the brakes down the mountain. We also went over the Coast Range to Tillamook and back and the story was similar there, mileage came down uphill and went back up downhill. Trip was concluded with the mileage meter at 50.1 at time of rental car turn-in, not hand calculated.

Filled up twice, once was nearly empty and tool about 8.5 gallons. The other time was just before returning and took about 5 gallons from a meter indicated half full. Filled up at Costco both times at $4.95/gal. Total gas bill about $75, IIRC.

The cruise control operation took a little getting used to, there is no button that is labeled Set, but I figured out eventually the activation button is kind of universal.

From a power perspective, this car is not a powerhouse but I would say the power is adequate for most driving situations. I never felt like I was lacking for power, at any rate. If you give it a lot of pedal there is a lot more noise, but I suppose that comes with the territory.

Did notice that the AC is more EV style, it does not appear to be coupled to the engine. We sat outside a winery for 30 minutes and for the first 20 minutes the engine didn't run to keep the car cool. Finally it started up after roughly 20 minutes but it only ran a couple of minutes and turned back off and the AC kept cooling after the engine turned off. This was an unexpected benefit.

I would say about the longest I was in the car was 2 hours driving at one sitting and the seats were pretty comfortable. They are a bit firmer than the seats in either of our cars, but well supported and comfortable for longer distances. I never felt like my backside was getting worn out by the seats.

Overall if you are looking for a sedan that is probably the hybrid mileage king for a reasonably sized sedan, I would recommend this vehicle. I certainly would not get something like the Prius or Corolla Hybrid over this to just eek out a few more MPG. The Camry for 2025+ is hybrid only and so you can get a lower end model like the LE for a reasonable price. I have seen the LE on lease offer for under $350 on Leasehackr.

I kind of wonder if Toyota is ready for a series hybrid with a little larger battery, given that this car activated EV mode at fairly high speeds and that the AC will run with the engine off. With their conservative push into EVs I wonder if that would be a good intermediate step for them, that their customers would appreciate. It would be more likely to find a spot in my driveway with 100 miles of EV only range, but anyway, that's neither here nor there.

Anyway overall liked the car, it wasn't perfect, but was pretty good. I can see why these are so popular. For a big bubba like me it's a little on the small (and low) side compared to a crossover, but I could probably live with it.
 
Last edited:
50+ mpg even when going at 75 with ac? that's stellar. I imagined the mpg would go down to 35-40 once you went close to 80 which would still be great. Someone here mentioned that the a25a quiets down a lot when accelerating with 30 grade or thicker.
 
I kind of wonder if Toyota is ready for a series hybrid with a little larger battery, given that this car activated EV mode at fairly high speeds and that the AC will run with the engine off. With their conservative push into EVs I wonder if that would be a good intermediate step for them, that their customers would appreciate. It would be more likely to find a spot in my driveway with 100 miles of EV only range, but anyway, that's neither here nor there.
Rav4 Prime is more or less the same platform in a plug in CUV. Something like 45 miles of plug in range. https://www.toyota.com/rav4pluginhybrid/
 
The first thing you'll notice about this vehicle that it is low. Not quite as low as my co-worker's Model 3, but pretty low nonetheless. It felt like a significant stepdown even compared to my wife's Mach-E. I'm used to driving an F-150 (Lightning) that I have to step up into, so it's a pretty big departure.
Yes, generally all cars sit lower than SUVs and trucks.
Just part of their design.
 
Rav4 Prime is more or less the same platform in a plug in CUV. Something like 45 miles of plug in range. https://www.toyota.com/rav4pluginhybrid/
I rented a Rav4 in San Diego in February (had requested a Camry, ironically)

The Rav4 (and CR-V as well) just aren't as good on legroom as the Camry, and other CUVs, for someone tall like me. I don't think I could live with one. I made it work for 3 days, but would not want to live with it. My knees were close enough to the dash that the keys were hitting my knee as I drove. It was pretty uncomfortable.

If I had to choose a PHEV CUV in this class that I wanted to live with, I'd probably go with the Outlander PHEV. It had very good legroom and headroom when I test drove one a couple years back. Of course, one would be right to be concerned with the health of the parent company.
 
I rented a Rav4 in San Diego in February (had requested a Camry, ironically)

The Rav4 (and CR-V as well) just aren't as good on legroom as the Camry, and other CUVs, for someone tall like me. I don't think I could live with one. I made it work for 3 days, but would not want to live with it. My knees were close enough to the dash that the keys were hitting my knee as I drove. It was pretty uncomfortable.

If I had to choose a PHEV CUV in this class that I wanted to live with, I'd probably go with the Outlander PHEV. It had very good legroom and headroom when I test drove one a couple years back. Of course, one would be right to be concerned with the health of the parent company.
Yes, well your likely a 2 standard deviation outlier. My wife is 4'10 and she is 2 standard deviations the other direction. I understand that car shopping can be challenging. :ROFLMAO:
 
I know that on my Prius and maybe all the other Toyota hybrids, the AC compressor is run off the hybrid battery. Depending on how much you're asking it to do vs. ambient temp it can go a pretty good bit before the battery charge hits 20% and the engine has to crank to recharge. Edit to say if you're just sitting in a parking lot or at a long light.
 
Last edited:
Yes, well your likely a 2 standard deviation outlier. My wife is 4'10 and she is 2 standard deviations the other direction. I understand that car shopping can be challenging. :ROFLMAO:
True, they don't design these things with 6'7" guys in mind, at best, we're edge of the envelope. I can't imagine being that Spurs guy Wemby-whatever his name is, I think he's 7'3" or 7'4". At least living in the US he can buy an HD pickup. He probably drove from the back seat in France.
 
I kind of wonder if Toyota is ready for a series hybrid with a little larger battery, given that this car activated EV mode at fairly high speeds and that the AC will run with the engine off. With their conservative push into EVs I wonder if that would be a good intermediate step for them, that their customers would appreciate. It would be more likely to find a spot in my driveway with 100 miles of EV only range, but anyway, that's neither here nor there.
The design debate between serial vs parallel hybrid has been around since the 1990s and the solution in the end is always parallel hybrid unless you don't have the mechanical expertise to do it right (BMW i3 with range booster). A true serial hybrid has typically at least a 20% efficiency penalty.

Even the recent Honda hybrid is serial only in the low end, and the high end is a direct couple between engine and transmission. You can think of it as an electric torque converter until the final drive. Toyota's HSD already solved the bigest problem of a parallel hybird so there is no reason they would go back.

As for more EV mode. They do have plug in hybrid but the cost and trade off vs a true EV or non-plug-in hybrid is too much. Their range is nothing close to a real EV (300 miles) and the cost is enough for a battery replacement 15 years down the road with no additional mpg increase (if not a decrease due to additional weight forcing them to increase size or shorten gear ratio).

I think most customers who want a very specific type of hybrid like plug in, would go for either a Prius or a CUV. Camry is still more of a car for people who wants a Camry as first priority and a hybrid second, instead of a hybrid first and a Camry second.
 
Rented a 2026 Camry for a week in Oregon, turned it in yesterday morning. Drove around 800 miles.

The first thing you'll notice about this vehicle that it is low. Not quite as low as my co-worker's Model 3, but pretty low nonetheless. It felt like a significant stepdown even compared to my wife's Mach-E.
I rented a 2025 Camry hybrid in San Francisco last year and as a 6'5" person I had to laugh because every time I got into it, I fell into it. Every time I got out of it, I was doing a one leg sideways body squat. It was comfortable enough once I was in, but getting in and out was not fun.
 
Rented a Camry hybrid back in Feb when I took my daughter on a school visit to Ole Miss. Really impressed overall with the comfort and performance, and I'm not a small dude either. I would have no issue purchasing one for sure. Nice review!
 
I rented a Camry and Altima back to back - the Altima was hands down the more comfortable and better driving car - although also had a very low seating position.

I too had an issue with the very limited movement of the tilt wheel and odd noises emanating from the powertrain. I wouldn't be happy owning this generation Camry.

Solid review (y)
 
Back
Top Bottom