2021 Odyssey oil spec

@MrStamper the manual shows -20C and above is fine with 10W-30. In Oregon what ambient temperatures are you seeing? What type of driving and oil temps do you hit?
Ranges from 6°F to 112°F. Was thinking about switching to a 30 weight oil for the summer. Summers here are not mild, there are several weeks over 95 and a couple of days over 100. Plus all the stop and go traffic…
 
There is no such thing as "tighter tolerance" from a factory engine. I've built engines that were plastigauged or tee micrometered them to the book minimum on all the rod and crank bearings and still ran 30 and 40wt oils in them.
There is such a thing and it's constantly being confused with 'tighter clearances'. Presumably GM's issue is at least in part due to loose tolerances, not loose clearances. :)
 
Show of hands ...
How many "thickies" think oil viscosity will overcome design shortcomings and manufacturing flaws such as:
- Chrysler MDS
- Honda VCM
- Kia Theta 2 cranks
- Toyota 3.4L TT machining debris
- Saturn SL2 engines with no oil drain back holes in the rings
- etc ...
FWIW, there's nothing wrong with Chrysler's MDS, the MDS lifters don't fail. There have been QC issues with the lifters (ALL the lifters), same as with Ford on the 7.3L Godzilla, and some of the GM engines. GM has the added issue of having their AFM/DFM lifters internally collapse, which is not a problem the MDS lifters have.
 
Show of hands ...
How many "thickies" think oil viscosity will overcome design shortcomings and manufacturing flaws such as:
- Chrysler MDS
- Honda VCM
- Kia Theta 2 cranks
- Toyota 3.4L TT machining debris
- Saturn SL2 engines with no oil drain back holes in the rings
- etc ...
This^
 
About my personal 21’ Honda odyssey. Normal US spec is 0w-20. So I dug around thinking, huh what’s it in…Mexico…

If I hear another word about “tighter tolerances” lmao

View attachment 277667

View attachment 277668
Tighter tolerances are definitely a thing, like 50 years ago... Perhaps more recent is better machining with lower/fewer asperities that allows for a thinner hydrodynamic film being necessary to separate the parts. Add in better quality oils and you can definitely take advantage.

Whether you want to, the stress level of the engine, etc. all come into play…
 
Tighter tolerances are definitely a thing, like 50 years ago... Perhaps more recent is better machining with lower/fewer asperities that allows for a thinner hydrodynamic film being necessary to separate the parts. Add in better quality oils and you can definitely take advantage.

Whether you want to, the stress level of the engine, etc. all come into play…
And amusingly, things went the other direction on piston fitment, tolerances were loosened up (the allowable piston-to-wall clearance range grew) to allow for bulk-fit slugs rather than hand-fit. This, combined with short skirts, is how we ended up with a lot of engines with piston slap in the early 2000's.

I took the OP as taking a jab at the "tighter tolerances" error oft made when the person really means clearances, a myth that refuses to die. Bearing clearances really haven't changed much since the beginning, but per your point, an old 60's Windsor would have similar crank and rod clearance specs as well as their tolerance range to what we see today. What we DID end up with was far more rigid bottom ends, which was a necessary change to allow long-term durability on thinner lubricants.
 
Last edited:
All this talk has me thinking as well. My 21 Ram with the Hemi and the Wife’s 21 Jeep GC 3.6 both spec 20 weights. I bought the 100k extended warranty on both. When that expires I’m highly considering switching to 5w30 on both. I really don’t see a downside. Maybe it won’t make a difference but to me there has to be something to this. Especially when the same engine in a different country specs a thicker oil in many engines.
I switched over to 0w30 in both my 19 5.7 Hemi and my wife’s 18 grand caravan last year. Gained about 10 psi of oil pressure. Take it for what it’s worth, but the valve train on the van definitely seems quieter.
 
I've been running 5W-30 in the Ram for a while now. I tow a travel trailer, and FCA seems to favor having the active grille shutters stay closed until coolant temps get up to about 230F. Oil temps can get up to 210-220F usually. Haven't noticed any change in oil pressure going to 5W-30, and I haven't noticed any decline in mileage. Last road trip out west it still easily managed 22 MPG highway. Who knows? It might be just fine with 0W-20, but it seems 5W-30 doesn't hurt anything either.
 
Instead of 0w40, one could go out on a limb and use one of the many 5w40s that meet API SQ and ACEA A3/B4 down to minus 30C.

My issue with the variable pressure oil pump is the delay time it takes for the oil pressure to catch up to the engine’s requirement when the rpm is suddenly increased.

The 6.0 and 6.6L engines in the HDs without all the start/ stop cylinder dropping nonsense and same bearing clearances and tolerances as the 5.3s and 6.2s in the light duty applications last forever on 5w30 Dexos.
 
1746556015090.webp
Screenshot_20250506-112558~2.webp


I'll throw my car in the ring. First is a snippet from the 2021 5 Series owners manual provided in Europe. Second is a snippet from my US owner's manual. Hmm.
 
I know it is apples to oranges, Hellcat and Nissan GTR spec 0w-40 and the Ford Coyote a 5w-50. Not the main every day vehicle of course and cost way more, but man there sure are a ton of Hellcats around here. LOL

Plus I guess these were not needed to consider an approval for CAFE???
 
I know it is apples to oranges, Hellcat and Nissan GTR spec 0w-40 and the Ford Coyote a 5w-50. Not the main every day vehicle of course and cost way more, but man there sure are a ton of Hellcats around here. LOL

Plus I guess these were not needed to consider an approval for CAFE???
Well it is a “corporate average” fuel economy.
 
Back
Top Bottom