You guys just *have* to see this. He estimates 100,000 miles. The *crank* broke, and there's burned oil everywhere.
It did look like a Purolator… Or Motorcraft? Seems like the little EBs are tuned to the gills, putting out a LOT of power for their displacement-not sure that’s a recipe for durability!The aftermarket oil filter caused the failure...
One youtube video hardly makes it a rule. There are plenty of high mile Ecoboosts out there. Go over to goodcarbadcar.com and see how many F150s and sold and get back to me.It did look like a Purolator… Or Motorcraft? Seems like the little EBs are tuned to the gills, putting out a LOT of power for their displacement-not sure that’s a recipe for durability!
Oh good, we are way overdue for another Ford bashing thread.![]()
We’ve blown up the 3.5 EB F-150s we bought… If they’re so great, why doesn’t Ford put them in the F-250, -350, & -450s?? The YT engine looks pretty neglected-it takes a LOT of abuse to stick all the compression rings like that. Ford isn’t the only one-GM has been stuffing tiny turbo GDI 3 & 4 cylinders in a lot of little SUVs too. Not sure they will fare any better…One youtube video hardly makes it a rule. There are plenty of high mile Ecoboosts out there. Go over to goodcarbadcar.com and see how many F150s and sold and get back to me.
Does "we" indicate fleet or corporate use? (Not personal, I hope.)We’ve blown up the 3.5 EB F-150s we bought… If they’re so great, why doesn’t Ford put them in the F-250, -350, & -450s?? The YT engine looks pretty neglected-it takes a LOT of abuse to stick all the compression rings like that. Ford isn’t the only one-GM has been stuffing tiny turbo GDI 3 & 4 cylinders in a lot of little SUVs too. Not sure they will fare any better…
Please..................We’ve blown up the 3.5 EB F-150s we bought… If they’re so great, why doesn’t Ford put them in the F-250, -350, & -450s?? The YT engine looks pretty neglected-it takes a LOT of abuse to stick all the compression rings like that. Ford isn’t the only one-GM has been stuffing tiny turbo GDI 3 & 4 cylinders in a lot of little SUVs too. Not sure they will fare any better…
Just a WAG, but probably whatever bulk oil when they had the oil changed, and probably followed the OLM + some.Anytime I see 1 of these videos, I always wonder what oil was used and what the OCI's were.
Do you mean https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/ ?One youtube video hardly makes it a rule. There are plenty of high mile Ecoboosts out there. Go over to goodcarbadcar.com and see how many F150s and sold and get back to me.
Yes! Thank you for the correction.
No way; they leave a lot on the table, as do the 2.7s (which BTW can easily be tuned on E85 to eclipse even the stock 3.5HO)… but let me tell you this: mixing E30 into a 3.5 and having the right tune can easily make well over 500rwhp. I’ve been running that tune for most of the 55k miles I’ve owned my ‘19 STX. Other than about a 2mpg hit (winter is worse, for obvious reasons) there has been no problem whatsoever.It did look like a Purolator… Or Motorcraft? Seems like the little EBs are tuned to the gills, putting out a LOT of power for their displacement-not sure that’s a recipe for durability!
Does "we" indicate fleet or corporate use? (Not personal, I hope.)
What approximate percentage of the EBs fail, and at what typical mileage?
Do you know the failure mode? (E.g. head gaskets, timing chains, dropped valves, etc.)
Are there unusual usage patterns that might lead to the failures?
Just idle curiousity on my part.
Also wondering how Ford's 2.7EB and Chevy's 2.7T are holding up in truck service.