2013 Nissan Pathfinder

Status
Not open for further replies.
And there's the Infiniti JX , which is a plusher version of the Pathfinder. I like the looks of the Infiniti more. The front end looks less gaudy and the whole car just flows.
 
Looks are subjective...it's not bad looking...but my opinion means little in this regard.

What's significant is the change to unibody construction, and loss of ground clearance. Another ute designed for pavement...a tall station wagon, in other words...a crossover vehicle...

Another boring, bland, mall cruiser...just what we all need...
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14


Another boring, bland, mall cruiser...just what we all need...

I think that's actually what most of US does want. How many SUV buyers take them off road? Most buy them for a somewhat taller seating position and the ability to run an occasional curb at the mall parking lot. A jacked up station wagon would have worked, which is what this Pathfinder and many other SUVs/CUVs really are.
 
Originally Posted By: NHGUY
How many crossover SUVs does the market need? CAFE standards are going to thin the herd shortly.


I've been wondering this myself. It seems like every SUV is turning into the same FWD blob with a car suspension and drivetrain. How many crossovers does a car company really need? This will bring Nissan to four of them.

It's sad to see one of the last holdouts become just another crossover. They still have the Xterra, but its days are probably numbered.

RIP truck-based Pathfinder, you had a good run (1986-2012)...
nissan_pathfinder_red_2door_1986.jpg
 
I used to own a 98' Pathfinder, decent little truck. Obviously, the mpg wasn't good at all, but i didn't care. I bought an SUV for a reason, and I knew the mpg I was going to get and was fine with it. I mainly bought it as a winter beater, but the trans. went out about a year later. What a shame, it was in great shape, but it wasn't worth putting a trans. in it.
 
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: Astro14


Another boring, bland, mall cruiser...just what we all need...


I think that's actually what most of US does want. How many SUV buyers take them off road? Most buy them for a somewhat taller seating position and the ability to run an occasional curb at the mall parking lot. A jacked up station wagon would have worked, which is what this Pathfinder and many other SUVs/CUVs really are.


That's what most of America needs. Something to get from point A to point B. And does the above. Maybe if cars were a bit less bling, and more boring, we'd be less tempted to trade out of them for the latest and greatest.
 
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
A jacked up station wagon would have worked, which is what this Pathfinder and many other SUVs/CUVs really are.


As you (correctly) stated, that's all most modern SUVs/CUVs are: jacked up station wagons. And that's what I love about many of them: you nearly get the fuel economy of a station wagon, and generally have more cargo area in the back due to the taller roof and generally have a more comfortable and upright seating position than in a true sedan/wagon.
 
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl


RIP truck-based Pathfinder, you had a good run (1986-2012)...
nissan_pathfinder_red_2door_1986.jpg



Actually, the 2nd generation was unibody. Third generation went back to truck based, and now they are back to unibody again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom