Originally Posted By: m37charlie
Reference SAE paper 2004-01-2986 "How much ZDP is enough", written by 2 GM engineers. They conclude that 750-1000ppm was enough to break in flat tappet engines in the 70s. 500 ppm is enough to protect broken-in engines. These figures are for phosphorus. They think 500-800 P is more than enough now for modern engines plus broken-in older engines.
That said, in another paper 2000-01-1993 "Performance of an advanced synthetic oil", Mobil outlines the development of CH-4 Delvac 1. They increased phosphorus from 1160 to 1350 to mitigate wear in the valvetrain and other wear due to increasing soot levels in the 1998 diesel CH-4 regime. BTW Delo 400 15W-40 CI4+ has 1360 P.
Now the CJ4s seem to be around 1200.
Remember that levels over 2000 ppm (zinc?) can cause catastrophic cam lobe wear, and ZDDPlus is potent. Even in my 30 qt pan one bottle will increase Zn 280 and P 210. In a 5 qt pan we're talking Zn going up 1750 and P 1256. I wouldn't use over half a bottle in a 5 qt pan even with an anemic 500 ppm oil.
Charlie
SO I was correct. Valvoline VR1 with 0.14/0.13 ZDDP is fine with out adding 'mouse milk'.
With evidence, such as these SAE papers, what is the reason for using the ZDDP additives, except when your regular oil is deficient in ZDDP? There is a lot of oil out there with over 0.100/0.100 ZDDP.
My opinion is, use the correct oil and forget about the 'mouse milk' that makes the additive suppliers rich.
m37charlie, thanks for posting this. A lot of info I have received is direct from the 'mouse milk' manufacturers and distributors. Are they hyping their own products?
You, the consumer, should decide based upon valid independent tests.