With DishNetwork, a 2 year contact is NOT 2 years?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
11,075
Location
Illinois
My parents had Dish Network on a two year contract.

Today was the 2 year anniversary date. This morning, I called to cancel their service for them (as I had set it up). Everything seemed to go fine, final bill, returning the equipment, blah, blah, blah. No mention of any issues. Thought I was done with it.

I get an email message from Dish tonight, stating that I'd cancelled the contract early, and that there would be a $20 early cancellation penalty.

I called in, to find out what had gone wrong. I get an Account Specialist on the phone, and ask him how I got this email message, with the notice of the $20 penalty.

This next part, I kid you not. He starts off telling me that it is because February only has 28 days, so my contact was a few days longer than 2 years, to make up for February being shorter than all of the other months.

At that point, I told him that he had to be kidding with an explanation like that, and I demanded a supervisor... and repeated it over and over. I do not tolerate my time and effort, being squandered by sheer idiocy like that.

He puts me on hold for about a minute and a half, then comes back, and tells me very quickly that the $20 penalty will automatically be credited back to may account, and that everything is fine, and that I shouldn't have received the email message and to simply delete it.

The only thing that I can figure out, is that I was the "lucky" incoming call to be pranked with the total Bee Ess explanation of "February only having 28 days". The problem is, that's about as unprofessional as it gets. But, we are talking about Dish Network. The bottom line is, I'll never use them again.

However, I still don't know how Dish Network figures that 2 years is something different than 2 years.
 
So, only sign up with Dish on a leap year?
grin.gif


I don't understand the logic these huge companies employ. I once told TomTom I wouldn't use them again and the guy said he didn't care. (paraphrasing)
 
So long as you actually get the $20 back, that actually seems like good customer service for a satellite or cable company.

Their billing system might be set up to count the number of days rather than the number of months you are a customer. It was probably an automated process that led to the $20 charge, and the person you got on the phone gave the default response. When you weren't happy with it (understandably), they went to a manager who could give approval to override it, and they gave the okay. It really sounds like they put up minimal fight and made it right quickly.
 
You got lured into a "customer retention specialist", in other words a salesman whose job is to make you change your mind.

AOL used to have 'em to bug you when you called after your 45 free days.
 
Originally Posted By: Olds394
So, only sign up with Dish on a leap year?
grin.gif


I don't understand the logic these huge companies employ. I once told TomTom I wouldn't use them again and the guy said he didn't care. (paraphrasing)


Oh, so they treat their customers the same way that Garmin treats theirs?
 
Originally Posted By: Olds394
So, only sign up with Dish on a leap year?
grin.gif


I don't understand the logic these huge companies employ. I once told TomTom I wouldn't use them again and the guy said he didn't care. (paraphrasing)


The jerk may have claimed he didn't care but the chances are he lost his job because of it, the management do monitor these calls and actually DO listen to the recorded calls too. My guess is there is a good chance he got fired, now true maybe he didn't care about that.
 
Last edited:
cut the cord. we did 8 years ago and havent looked back. fox news isnt worth paying for let alone watching it for free.
 
Originally Posted By: GiveMeAVowel
Originally Posted By: Olds394
So, only sign up with Dish on a leap year?
grin.gif


I don't understand the logic these huge companies employ. I once told TomTom I wouldn't use them again and the guy said he didn't care. (paraphrasing)


The jerk may have claimed he didn't care but the chances are he lost his job because of it, the management do monitor these calls and actually DO listen to the recorded calls too. My guess is there is a good chance he got fired, now true maybe he didn't care about that.


I had a friend who worked for a small time call center and even they would go through a handful of each employee's calls each week.
 
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
cut the cord. we did 8 years ago and havent looked back. fox news isnt worth paying for let alone watching it for free.


If Fox news isn't worth watching, what does that say about all of the other news outlets?
 
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
cut the cord. we did 8 years ago and havent looked back. fox news isnt worth paying for let alone watching it for free.


If Fox news isn't worth watching, what does that say about all of the other news outlets?


Careful, that line of thinking my eventually lead down a path of athiesim. Who would ever try to think for themselves and take the red pill.
 
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: cptbarkey
cut the cord. we did 8 years ago and havent looked back. fox news isnt worth paying for let alone watching it for free.


If Fox news isn't worth watching, what does that say about all of the other news outlets?


Careful, that line of thinking my eventually lead down a path of athiesim. Who would ever try to think for themselves and take the red pill.


Not quite sure what that means, but I always find it laughable when someone brings up how bad Fox news is, and never mentions any of the others, which are much worse...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: grampi
Not quite sure what that means, but I always find it laughable when someone brings up how bad Fox news is, and never mentions any of the others, which are much worse...


We don't have enough time to play 20 questions with you to go through a list of every news outlet on the planet, to determine which ones are acceptable to everyone.

But, I'm going to point out the obvious:

Some people feel that Fox News is better as a comedy show than it is as a factual news outlet. I'm guessing that you're not one of them, though.

BC.
 
I've had Dish Network in the past, and now have Uverse.

I am going to be moving soon into a remote area that has no land-line options for TV or 'net. So despite now much one might bad-mouth satellite TV, there are times it's better than nothing.

Honestly, I actually like the packages with Dish more than Uverse, but the Uverse has been good. They are all getting silly-expensive, but living without full programming and internet is like living in the dark ages, so it's what we have to do to get along today ...


As to the odd customer service issue, that's not unique to Dish by any means. Poor/odd/crazy CS can be found at most any company now days. Good for you sticking up for yourself and not accepting their sorry, lame explanation. That rationale they exhibited simply defies logic.
 
Originally Posted By: Bladecutter
Originally Posted By: grampi
Not quite sure what that means, but I always find it laughable when someone brings up how bad Fox news is, and never mentions any of the others, which are much worse...


We don't have enough time to play 20 questions with you to go through a list of every news outlet on the planet, to determine which ones are acceptable to everyone.

But, I'm going to point out the obvious:

Some people feel that Fox News is better as a comedy show than it is as a factual news outlet. I'm guessing that you're not one of them, though.

BC.


Personally I think MSNBC is much more of a circus act than FOX is, but MSNBC pushes liberal views, whereas Fox pushes conservative views. People always bring up Fox news, and never bring up MSNBC because of this very reason. Apparently these people are okay with news outlets spreading manure so long as the manure being spread matches their point of view...
 
Last edited:
How many of them have actually argued in court that they are an entertainment outlet and don't have to stick to the literal truth ?
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
How many of them have actually argued in court that they are an entertainment outlet and don't have to stick to the literal truth ?


Good question...how many?
 
Originally Posted By: grampi

Personally I think MSNBC is much more of a circus act than FOX is, but MSNBC pushes liberal views, whereas Fox pushes conservative views. People always bring up Fox news, and never bring up MSNBC because of this very reason. Apparently these people are okay with news outlets spreading manure so long as the manure being spread matches their point of view...


Why do I need to be told what to think? I read, IDK, 200-300 words a minute. This is way faster than any talking head can speak. Plus, if a story doesn't interest me, I can skip to another and not be stuck in a linear news delivery.

I have no need for 24 hour news. Condense it into 1/2 an hour every night and put Cialis ads in every break. I can run it for background noise while I'm reading news online.
wink.gif


Maybe it isn't a liberal or conservative thing. Maybe these news channels... all of them... exist for those who can't form their own opinions.
27.gif


And that's [censored] scary.

Now the cable and satellite guys pay FNC and CNN per customer per month, whether they watch it or not. If I don't want either of those channels coming into my house, my only option is to cut the cord. They won't do a la carte. So I have no "cord". Happy.
 
Originally Posted By: eljefino
Originally Posted By: grampi

Personally I think MSNBC is much more of a circus act than FOX is, but MSNBC pushes liberal views, whereas Fox pushes conservative views. People always bring up Fox news, and never bring up MSNBC because of this very reason. Apparently these people are okay with news outlets spreading manure so long as the manure being spread matches their point of view...


Why do I need to be told what to think? I read, IDK, 200-300 words a minute. This is way faster than any talking head can speak. Plus, if a story doesn't interest me, I can skip to another and not be stuck in a linear news delivery.

I have no need for 24 hour news. Condense it into 1/2 an hour every night and put Cialis ads in every break. I can run it for background noise while I'm reading news online.
wink.gif


Maybe it isn't a liberal or conservative thing. Maybe these news channels... all of them... exist for those who can't form their own opinions.
27.gif


And that's [censored] scary.

Now the cable and satellite guys pay FNC and CNN per customer per month, whether they watch it or not. If I don't want either of those channels coming into my house, my only option is to cut the cord. They won't do a la carte. So I have no "cord". Happy.
+1
 
Pay TV is so yesterday, cut the cord, stream, redbox, Hulu Plus and major stations with an attic antenna in MUCH better HD quality then cable or Sat. If your near a city and within 50 miles of the towers. Just google TV Antenna aiming to find out for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom