Why is the V-4 so underutilized in motorcycles?

Status
Not open for further replies.
All engine types and configurations have their charm, advocates and detractors. Being able to choose from among all these different bikes is just one of the things that makes motorcycling such a blast.
Politically Correctness smells... I rather my configuration to fight for market share not crawl up it's own ares and suffocate...
 
Last edited:
Beg to differ all you want. I stand by my statement. No other engine type for motorcycles intended for use on the street can match the low end torque, and high RPM HP for a given displacement. I'm inviting you to post one, but I know you aren't going to because none exist...

Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. A lot of other stuff does matter which determines and engine's T and HP output vs RPM.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...engine-config-means-nothing-on-output.356868/

Well, engine technology is better today ... but if you want to compare the Honda V65 to a Yamaha XSR900 (inline 3), the T and HP curves are about the same. The V65 is 1065cc and the XSR900 is only 849cc (51.8 cu-in). If the XSR900 was 1065cc it would smoke the V65 V4 in T and HP.

Honda V65 (1065cc) V4.

1657143224373.png


Yamaha XSR900 (849cc, 51.8 cu-in) I3.

1657143241247.png
 
Last edited:
I just thought of an interesting story I thought I'd pass along. Back when I was in the Air Force, I served with a guy who worked in our shop. At the time I had an '89 Vmax. This other guy had a Kawasaki 1500 Vulcan. We were talking bikes one day and he brought up how hard the Vulcan pulled on the bottom end. I also mentioned how hard the Max pulled down low, so we decided to find out which bike pulled harder. Keep in mind, the Max gives 300ccs to the Vulcan, and I outweighed the other guy by at least 50 lbs. Starting from 30 MPH in top gear, the Max easily pulled away, and by the time we hit 50-55, the Max pulled away pretty hard. We never went past 70, by then the Max was pulling away so fast there was no sense in going any faster...
That kind of stuff also depends on the gearing of the machine.
 
Y'alls like to argue online way more than I do apparently. Jeez.

Beyond everything else being thrown around here, no one has really yet mentioned packaging. The rear cylinders on V-twins and V-fours get in the way of rear suspension bits. It can be done obviously, but having more room back there makes sorting out the rear end a lot easier as far as shock placement, swingarm length and pivot location, etc.
 
If a V4 configuration is so superior to an i4 one in every aspect, the why don’t we see it in small sports cars like Miata, S2000 or BMW Z3? Who would not love a little sports machine that can scream to high RPM and have plenty of low end TQ?
At the very least, Honda would have attempted such a feat given their experience with V4 engines in their motorcycles. Why they have not done so?
 
If a V4 configuration is so superior to an i4 one in every aspect, the why don’t we see it in small sports cars like Miata, S2000 or BMW Z3? Who would not love a little sports machine that can scream to high RPM and have plenty of low end TQ?
At the very least, Honda would have attempted such a feat given their experience with V4 engines in their motorcycles. Why they have not done so?
Because cagers close their wallets with a torque wrench and the current Honda CEO has no sport in his blood.. Mr.Honda would...
 
I had a chance to buy one of these NR750 in 93 but it was too much wood. IIRC it was 70K DM at the time. The ultimate V4.


View attachment 106962
No You Didn't!!! How on earth did you find one of these things for sale? Seventy Thousand Deutsche marks would be a bargain with today's currency conversions. That thing never did for Honda what they wanted but it was an engineering masterpiece none the less. I thought they'd all be destroyed and the blueprints shredded and burned. I've never even had the pleasure of seeing one in person. Great picture!!
 
I had a chance to buy one of these NR750 in 93 but it was too much wood. IIRC it was 70K DM at the time. The ultimate V4.
Yes the ultimate V4... so far nobody has loss money investing Mr.Honda's exotic V4s...

Me and Jason's NR750 at Bubba Gumps
1410185137_88957c9084.jpg


Jim Granger's shop
JimGrangerShop08.JPG
NR750PistonBottom.jpg
 
Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. A lot of other stuff does matter which determines and engine's T and HP output vs RPM.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...engine-config-means-nothing-on-output.356868/

Well, engine technology is better today ... but if you want to compare the Honda V65 to a Yamaha XSR900 (inline 3), the T and HP curves are about the same. The V65 is 1065cc and the XSR900 is only 849cc (51.8 cu-in). If the XSR900 was 1065cc it would smoke the V65 V4 in T and HP.

Honda V65 (1065cc) V4.

View attachment 106935

Yamaha XSR900 (849cc, 51.8 cu-in) I3.

View attachment 106936
Comparing a new engine to a 40 year old design is hardly an apples to apples comparison. Compare these two engines, at the same size, with the same era design technology and the V-4 would blow this engine away...in fact, I think Yamaha made an inline 3 back around the same time the Honda V-4s were coming on line and they didn't compare to the V-4s...
 
No You Didn't!!! How on earth did you find one of these things for sale? Seventy Thousand Deutsche marks would be a bargain with today's currency conversions. That thing never did for Honda what they wanted but it was an engineering masterpiece none the less. I thought they'd all be destroyed and the blueprints shredded and burned. I've never even had the pleasure of seeing one in person. Great picture!!
When I bought my SC24 new I bought the 92 in 93 as a leftover because DCBS was new and I didn't want to be a guinea pig. Anyway they had one right there in the showroom for sale, quite a few dealers had them in Germany. 70K DM was a lot of wood in Germany.
 
Beg to differ all you want. I stand by my statement. No other engine type for motorcycles intended for use on the street can match the low end torque, and high RPM HP for a given displacement. I'm inviting you to post one, but I know you aren't going to because none exist...
In the words of Steven Tyler... Dream On... I can't argue outside of facts
 
Negative... Honda's RC45 were engineered by HRC to achieve titles and achieve it most certainly did earning 35 total...

1st Suzuka 8 Hours Doug Polen Aaron Slight
1st Isle of Man TT F1 Steve Hislop
1st Isle of Man Senior Steve Hislop
1st NorthWest 200 Robert Dunlop
1st Ulster Gp Phillip McCallen
1st Australian Superbike Anthony Gobert

95 1st World Endurance Stéphane Mertens Jean-Michel Mattioli
1st 24 Hours of Le Mans Alex Vieira Rachel Nicotte Brian Morrison
1st Isle of Man TT F1 Phillip McCallen
1st Isle of Man TT Senior Joey Dunlop
1st AMA Superbike Miguel Duhamel
1st Ulster Gp Joey Dunlop
1st NorthWest Superbike Ian Simpson
1st Suzuka 8 Hours Aaron Slight Tadayuki Okada
1st Australian Superbike Kirk McCarthy

96
1st Isle of Man TT F1 Phillip McCallen
1st Isle of Man Senior Phillip McCallen
1st Dayton 200 Miguel Duhamel
1st NorthWest 200 Phillip McCallen
1st Ulster Gp Phillip McCallen

97
1st World Superbike John Kosinski
1st Isle of Man TT F1 Phillip McCallen
1st Isle of Man Senior Phillip McCallen
1st Suzuka 8 hours Shinichi Itoh Tohru Ukawa
1st NorthWest 200 Micheal Rutter

98
1st World Endurance Doug Pole Christian Lavieille
1st Isle of Man TT F1 Ian Simpson
1st Isle of Man Senior Ian Simpson
1st AMA Superbike Ben Bostrom
1st Macau GP Micheal Rutter
1st Suzuka 8 hours Shinichi Itoh Tohru Ukawa
1st NorthWest 200 Micheal Rutter

99
1st Dayton 200 Miguel Duhamel
1st Suzuka 8 hours Tadayuki Okada Alex Barros
1st Ulster Gp Joey Dunlop
If I threw as much talent and money at a rock it would likely win too...
 
Beg to differ all you want. I stand by my statement. No other engine type for motorcycles intended for use on the street can match the low end torque, and high RPM HP for a given displacement. I'm inviting you to post one, but I know you aren't going to because none exist...
Here are a few which, according to you and BLS are physically impossible. Note how the S1000R even stays right with the Tuono 1100 across the board despite giving up 80 cc. I could surely find others but you'll likely deny these and all others anyhow. Again... Dream On
 

Attachments

  • Capture.webp
    Capture.webp
    72.3 KB · Views: 11
  • Capture2.webp
    Capture2.webp
    27.8 KB · Views: 11
  • Capture3.webp
    Capture3.webp
    42.7 KB · Views: 12
Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. A lot of other stuff does matter which determines and engine's T and HP output vs RPM.
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...engine-config-means-nothing-on-output.356868/

Well, engine technology is better today ... but if you want to compare the Honda V65 to a Yamaha XSR900 (inline 3), the T and HP curves are about the same. The V65 is 1065cc and the XSR900 is only 849cc (51.8 cu-in). If the XSR900 was 1065cc it would smoke the V65 V4 in T and HP.

Honda V65 (1065cc) V4.

View attachment 106935

Yamaha XSR900 (849cc, 51.8 cu-in) I3.

View attachment 106936
Pretty obvious logic and facts hold no weight to the deluded... lol
 
Comparing a new engine to a 40 year old design is hardly an apples to apples comparison. Compare these two engines, at the same size, with the same era design technology and the V-4 would blow this engine away...in fact, I think Yamaha made an inline 3 back around the same time the Honda V-4s were coming on line and they didn't compare to the V-4s...
In the current models, the BMW S1000RR makes more HP than a Yamaha Vmax. The 2021 (last year made) Vmax is 1679cc and the BMW is 999cc. Yes, the S1000RR is a hyper bike, but it's a smaller displacement inline 4-cyl that makes way more HP than the Vmax. Of course their torque and HP curves are different ... but fact is the 999cc engine is making more HP than the 1679cc engine. What other current V4 engines today make more HP than the Vmax? Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. Everything else associated with an engine design does.

An old 2008 Hayabusa (which is 1340cc) basically made the same RWHP (180) as the 2021 Vmax. Of course they made HP in a different way due to how they develop torque, but in the end the HP and gearing is what matters.
 
Last edited:
Comparing a new engine to a 40 year old design is hardly an apples to apples comparison. Compare these two engines, at the same size, with the same era design technology and the V-4 would blow this engine away...in fact, I think Yamaha made an inline 3 back around the same time the Honda V-4s were coming on line and they didn't compare to the V-4s...
Added info. If you go search for the HP numbers between a Yamaha XS750 triple and a Honda V45 (750cc) Magna back in those days, they were basically both rated at ~75 HP ... far from the V4 "blowing it away". Again, the cylinder configuration really doesn't matter when it comes to making HP.
 
Added info. If you go search for the HP numbers between a Yamaha XS750 triple and a Honda V45 (750cc) Magna back in those days, they were basically both rated at ~75 HP ... far from the V4 "blowing it away". Again, the cylinder configuration really doesn't matter when it comes to making HP.
Added info. If you go search for the HP numbers between a Yamaha XS750 triple and a Honda V45 (750cc) Magna back in those days, they were basically both rated at ~75 HP ... far from the V4 "blowing it away". Again, the cylinder configuration really doesn't matter when it comes to making HP.
In the current models, the BMW S1000RR makes more HP than a Yamaha Vmax. The 2021 (last year made) Vmax is 1679cc and the BMW is 999cc. Yes, the S1000RR is a hyper bike, but it's a smaller displacement inline 4-cyl that makes way more HP than the Vmax. Of course their torque and HP curves are different ... but fact is the 999cc engine is making more HP than the 1679cc engine. What other current V4 engines today make more HP than the Vmax? Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. Everything else associated with an engine design does.

An old 2008 Hayabusa (which is 1340cc) basically made the same RWHP (180) as the 2021 Vmax. Of course they made HP in a different way due to how they develop torque, but in the end the HP and gearing is what matters.
In the current models, the BMW S1000RR makes more HP than a Yamaha Vmax. The 2021 (last year made) Vmax is 1679cc and the BMW is 999cc. Yes, the S1000RR is a hyper bike, but it's a smaller displacement inline 4-cyl that makes way more HP than the Vmax. Of course their torque and HP curves are different ... but fact is the 999cc engine is making more HP than the 1679cc engine. What other current V4 engines today make more HP than the Vmax? Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. Everything else associated with an engine design does.

An old 2008 Hayabusa (which is 1340cc) basically made the same RWHP (180) as the 2021 Vmax. Of course they made HP in a different way due to how they develop torque, but in the end the HP and gearing is what matters.

I think you're missing what I'm saying. The V-4 engine configuration is the only one that produces both an abundance of low end grunt, AND high RPM HP. No other engine configurations do this to the level of the V-4. The XS750 didn't produce
anywhere near the low end grunt of the V-45...
 
In the current models, the BMW S1000RR makes more HP than a Yamaha Vmax. The 2021 (last year made) Vmax is 1679cc and the BMW is 999cc. Yes, the S1000RR is a hyper bike, but it's a smaller displacement inline 4-cyl that makes way more HP than the Vmax. Of course their torque and HP curves are different ... but fact is the 999cc engine is making more HP than the 1679cc engine. What other current V4 engines today make more HP than the Vmax? Cylinder configuration really doesn't matter. Everything else associated with an engine design does.

An old 2008 Hayabusa (which is 1340cc) basically made the same RWHP (180) as the 2021 Vmax. Of course they made HP in a different way due to how they develop torque, but in the end the HP and gearing is what matters.
The Busa and BMW are one trick ponies. Neither of them make anywhere near the low end grunt of the Vmax...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom