Dailydriver,you don't need my help to reveal your ignorance. You do fine on your own.

Quote:
Boy, sounds like GM is getting better...your experience is almost identical to my wife's POS 1998 Buick.![]()
John
G.M. uses lower quality is the real term for softer. Also the clearances are less which is better. The machine tolerances are less than G.M's which is why some peoples G.M.s are good but there are more that are worse ,look at the numbers But my 2006 Toyota Tacoma has really poor quality compared to my 1985 Toyota truck or my 1992 Toyota truck which was my favorite.Quote:
LOL....I'm not touching the "foreign" versus "domestic" comments.
Few years back I was discussing this issue of Toyota engines versus GM engines with a engine builder. He had a unique viewpoint I'll share. He is/was convinced GM utilizes a much softer metal/material than Toyota specs for their rings/bearings etc. GM engineers are of the mindset these "softer" metals provide better performance and efficiencies...and will last just as long as the harder specs Toyota calls for. Of course this would account for higher wear metals in UOA's coming from a GM engine. Interesting viewpoint and I haven't a clue if it is accurate. Just added for whatever you experts can glean from it.
What is interesting is gas has really been pricy for what, the last 9 or 10 years. People still are buying big suvs .Quote:
"I'm thinking with fuel on the rise, Toyota would be better to bring back the smaller Tacoma as well as GM to bring back something smaller than the Canyon and it's cousin.
Dodge has nothing to offer in the mini truck segment,..."
It's a poor assumption to think that smaller means better fuel mileage, if that's what you're implying. My 3/4 ton Dodge diesel gets as good or better city mileage than all of the Tacomas except for the 2.7 liter engines, comparing my actual mileage with the EPA city mileage for the Tacomas. I just drive, and don't strive for better mileage.
Quote:
Dailydriver,you don't need my help to reveal your ignorance. You do fine on your own.![]()
Quote:
"I'm thinking with fuel on the rise, Toyota would be better to bring back the smaller Tacoma as well as GM to bring back something smaller than the Canyon and it's cousin.
Dodge has nothing to offer in the mini truck segment,..."
It's a poor assumption to think that smaller means better fuel mileage, if that's what you're implying. My 3/4 ton Dodge diesel gets as good or better city mileage than all of the Tacomas except for the 2.7 liter engines, comparing my actual mileage with the EPA city mileage for the Tacomas. I just drive, and don't strive for better mileage.