Some timing chain tensioners and VTEC solenoids and other engine components require 20w to work properly.
What's that oil temperature hitting on those hill climbs?
They recommend 0w-20 because they know around 90% of new truck buyers aren't going to run their truck any harder than getting a few bags of potting soil from the hardware store.
Does the manual say that or does the oil cap say to use 0w-20?
I would be one egg that if you find the part of the manual about towing a 5,000lb travel trailer up a mountain in the summer at interstate speed it wouldn't be telling you to use a 20 weight.
Maybe the 5.3L engines have a really amazing oil cooler and the oil never gets above 220f. But I doubt it.
So they all fail catastrophically in Winnipeg when it's -40C?Some timing chain tensioners and VTEC solenoids and other engine components require 20w to work properly.
THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Yet another thick vs. thin thread, complete with most all the same misconceptions and inaccurate assumptions as the rest of the 200+ threads.
I kind of like it.......................Perhaps it is time for BITOG to split into two separate sites: BITOGthin.com and BITOGthick.com. There is no resolution to this question. Whaddaya think of the two-state solution?
For me it's roadsalt ...Oil weight isn't killing cars, that's the way I see it anyway.
Can you describe these problems in detail?Its long term use of non recommend weight of oil that can cause a problem
That was a total retcon. We certainly watched Toyota move from 0 W 30 all the way to O W 8 on the same engine, and then make wildly different recommendations elsewhere in the world. (I said that like a thickie, which was not my intention).Huh? What engines got larger bearings with the change to 20 wt?
Surely you have some technical data to back this up?Its long term use of non recommend weight of oil that can cause a problem
It wasn't made up, it was in a paper from Honda that @Shannow shared on here years ago. This was back when Toyota, Honda and Nissan were all messing around with oils with an HTHS below 2.6cP. The paper noted that in order for wear to be kept to acceptable levels on, for example, 0W-12, they had to widen the bearings, which increased friction, but the reduction in overall pumping and frictional losses from the thinner oil, more than made up for it in fuel economy gains.That was a total retcon. We certainly watched Toyota move from 0 W 30 all the way to O W 8 on the same engine, and then make wildly different recommendations elsewhere in the world. (I said that like a thickie, which was not my intention).
It is a great point. Nobody can show us SBC bearings getting bigger over time as oils get thinner. Beyond that, surely some of the fuel economy value would be negated by the friction of a larger bearing.
That idea, like so much in the thick v. thin debate, was simply made up by somebody.
Again, where do you see this?good grief. The thicker oil causes the tensioner not to operate properly when the tensioner is designed for thinner oil
I'm out of here........
Death, taxes, and thick vs thin threads.
Come on, list 20 of 'em for us !as the rest of the 200+ threads.
If you get that message the engine is probably already toast.There are many of us that use trucks for "truck stuff". There are plenty of these things in fleets, city, state, and federal uses that are actually used as trucks.
I had the transmission temperature brought up on my DIC (on that Colorado trip)-it never went past 170 degrees.
Wasn't concerned about the engine oil temps-so I can't answer your question.
Never got a message to "pull over-your hot" or whatever it is.
I know the message can come up if for some reason you are over heating.