Originally Posted By: greenaccord02
I also see and have seen a "whole lot" of machines and I haven't encountered what I would call a pattern of problems with nvidia based boards.
They have a higher failure rate than Intel-based boards. Just like the junk from SiS, ALI and VIA. Not that they are as bad as those three, but, like them, have a higher failure rate than Intel chipset based boards.
I was building systems retail when the NForce chipset came into existence. It was the hot ticket for AMD CPU's because the only other options were VIA, SiS and ALI! LOL! AMD had since abandoned their own chipset production (much to the woe of enthusiasts that had enjoyed their reliability) when they transitioned from Slot-A.
NVidia's primary success in the chipset arena has been due to AMD; they were the only decent chipset manufacturer for AMD CPU's. It wasn't like you were able to slap your Athlon into an i865 chipset board.
Now that AMD has purchased ATI and has been producing their own chipsets, I'm not sure where that leaves NVidia.
Intel has licenses for both SLI and crossfire; there is no reason to buy an NVidia chipset for an Intel system really anymore.
They NVidia chipsets don't overclock like the Intel ones do. They aren't as stable as the Intel ones are and the driver support is not as good as the Intel ones. The only thing they have going for them most of the time is PRICE.
And here's an Anandtech article on the NVidia IDE corruption issue:
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3279&p=4