Where Americans moved in 2024

GON

$150 Site Donor 2025
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
10,529
Location
White Sands, NM
Always interesting to see these graphics. Trends indicate some of the migrations from covid have significantly slowed. But the trend of domestic migration from the Upper Midwest and the Northeast shows no signs of reversing.

On a positive, those folks domestically migrating from the Upper Midwest and the Northeast to the South and West appear to have some ability to negotiate in the purchase of homes, the Sellers markets continue in the West and South, but not anywhere near the Sellers market it was just 30 months ago.

I don't concur that reponing of offices are part of the reason for the domestic migration slowdown. Homes in the South and West are still selling at or near record highs, and with 30-year mortgages at their highest level in four years, it makes it very tough to sell a home in the Upper Midwest or Northeast and afford a home in the South or West.

From Chuck Cowan:
While Sun Belt states like Texas and Florida continue to see positive net migration, it’s far less domestic migration than during the Pandemic Housing Boom.

Florida net domestic migration, by year:

2019 -> +133K
2020 -> +63K
2021 -> +247K
2022 -> +314K
2023 -> +185K
2024 -> +64K

Migration shifts—and changes in the pace of migration—matter for the housing market, as they can shift the local supply-demand equilibrium.

Many of the softest housing markets, where homebuyers have gained leverage, are located in Sun Belt regions of the Gulf Coast and Mountain West. These areas were home to many of the nation’s top pandemic boomtowns, which experienced significant home price growth during the pandemic housing boom, which stretched housing affordability far beyond local income levels. Once offices reopened and mortgage rates spiked, pandemic-fueled migration quickly slowed in many parts of Texas and Florida.


Once that happened, markets like Punta Gorda, Florida and Austin, Texas faced challenges as they had to rely more on local incomes to sustain strained home prices.

473169145_10226252525608659_5526451788955844746_n.webp
 
In my Submarine days, whenever they would take a sounding, they would report it and navigation would reply (hopefully :)) - "Checks with chart." Means we are exactly where we're expected to be and depth is correct.

So, your picture....."Checks with chart..."

won't elaborte further....
 
Would be interesting to know the average age of the "migrant". Clearly retirees will be apt to move South in general. The question becomes what portion are moving for economic reasons vs. retirement / choice.

I agree that the housing price rise in the South has caused much of the slowdown. When you could sell a post WW2 shack in the NE or California for $1M and buy a mansion in Florida for the same, it was a no brainer. Now that $1M buys a lot less in Florida, there is much less incentive.
 
Not even close to accurate. No way.
Only datapoint I can give you personally is a really good friend of the family is a Realter in San Antonio, TX. She told us that out of every 10 houses she sells, half of the buyers are either from California or New York. My Mother-in-law lives in Florida. New neighbors right next door and down the street. One from California and the other from Illinois. My wife met them both over New Years. Nice people.
 
It would be interesting to know age distribution of coming and going into each state. I assume lots of people of retirement age are leaving the northeast, to buy a cheaper house in a warmer climate.
California is an interesting case, but I guess if you've made 2000% on your house since your bought it, and can buy something nice in a warmish climate for 20% of what you can sell your house for, you might move too!
Anyways, correlation is not the same as causation, and net migration is kind of the most useless stat for trying figure out why states are growing or shrinking.
 
I'm in FL in the Bradenton area and we're feeling the "net migration".

Along with Lakewood Ranch, Bradenton is on the shortlist of a home purchase for me and my better half. The market is oversaturated from what I've seen. If I were single at my age (50's) I'd sell my NY home and buy a monster in Cape Coral. Market is as ripe as it has been since prior to the VID.

You still pay a premium for the Sarasota area but same oversaturation of properties and the lag of housing cost price decreases is not so delayed anymore. We are seeing substantial decreases in some of the homes we've viewed.
 
Only datapoint I can give you personally is a really good friend of the family is a Realter in San Antonio, TX. She told us that out of every 10 houses she sells, half of the buyers are either from California or New York. My Mother-in-law lives in Florida. New neighbors right next door and down the street. One from California and the other from Illinois. My wife met them both over New Years. Nice people.
My son is there and about to move - not the city it once was ...
Too crowded and one block is good and the next is crime ridden ...
 
Only datapoint I can give you personally is a really good friend of the family is a Realter in San Antonio, TX. She told us that out of every 10 houses she sells, half of the buyers are either from California or New York.
OK I believe some of that, but my (useless) anecdotal data point is WA state as a whole. I would say Seattle alone gained 3K, King county and 3 counties on the south and north gained at least 1-3K. Not many leaving except to Idaho for more freedoms. Which is probably correct on gains.
 
My son is there and about to move - not the city it once was ...
Too crowded and one block is good and the next is crime ridden ...
I grew up in San Antonio. Still have a sister that lives there and tons of friends. My parents moved to New Braunfels 30 years ago. My other sister lived there until a few years ago and she is in San Marcos, TX now.

Agree with you. Some areas are still nice, but even the neighborhood I grew up in, not so nice anymore.....
 
OK I believe some of that, but my (useless) anecdotal data point is WA state as a whole. I would say Seattle alone gained 3K, King county and 3 counties on the south and north gained at least 1-3K. Not many leaving except to Idaho for more freedoms. Which is probably correct on gains.
Hasn't Boeing and related been laying people off for a while? Possibly those people are leaving for greener manufacturing pastures, while still getting new people from California, etc?
 
Is -291 for North Dakota a typo? It doesn't match the shading for the state, which has a population of almost 800k.
 
Back
Top Bottom