That's my thinking also which is why I'm leaning towards the 124 HP.in a micro compact a 147gr probably won't get to the velocity to expand a jhp . i would go with a gold dot 124
because they are trying to kill me or others....if someone warrants being shot by me they are doing something that they need to be killed. people that are intent on bad/evil things will not stop because they are wounded.If you choose a round that just injures someone, you may go to prison for 10 years. If you choose a round that actually kills someone, you can probably at least double that.
A person who has been shot by any kind or weight of bullet will likely no longer be a threat to you. Why do you want to kill them?
Sorry to hear about the laws in your state. In "free" states, if it's a self-defense situation, if you're protecting your home, etc, you don't go to jail.If you choose a round that just injures someone, you may go to prison for 10 years. If you choose a round that actually kills someone, you can probably at least double that.
Are police trained to shoot someone's weapon out of their hand ? Nope. Shoot a person in the knee to stop them from approaching ? Nope. Same "training" principles apply to regular people too.A person who has been shot by any kind or weight of bullet will likely no longer be a threat to you. Why do you want to kill them?
This is foolish advice based on a lack of understanding on lethal force.If you choose a round that just injures someone, you may go to prison for 10 years. If you choose a round that actually kills someone, you can probably at least double that.
A person who has been shot by any kind or weight of bullet will likely no longer be a threat to you. Why do you want to kill them?
There’s a series of short barrel HST ammo designed specifically for this application.I'm thinking a 124g HP would be the best compromise but others have suggested 147g....thoughts on what would be most effective in a 3" barrel micro compact at short (self defense) distances?
HST 124gr.I'm thinking a 124g HP would be the best compromise but others have suggested 147g....thoughts on what would be most effective in a 3" barrel micro compact at short (self defense) distances?
If you choose a round that just injures someone, you may go to prison for 10 years. If you choose a round that actually kills someone, you can probably at least double that.
A person who has been shot by any kind or weight of bullet will likely no longer be a threat to you. Why do you want to kill them?
In August 2008, during a traffic-related encounter that escalated into a gunfight, Gramins (then an officer) engaged a heavily armed suspect intent on killing police. He fired 33 rounds from his .45-caliber Glock 21, hitting the suspect 14 times—including 6 supposedly fatal shots to vital areas like the heart, lungs, liver, diaphragm, and kidney. Despite this, the attacker kept fighting and advancing for about 56 seconds until finally going down after the last few rounds.
Gramins came close to running out—he had only 4 rounds left in his final magazine—and the suspect fired 21 rounds from two handguns (plus had an SKS rifle ready but didn’t use it).
Before this incident, Gramins carried about 47 rounds total on duty (in his pistol and spare magazines). Afterward, he dramatically increased his loadout to 145 rounds “every day, without fail,” switching to a 9mm Glock 34 for higher capacity and more ammo on his person (multiple magazines on belt, vest, etc.).“
Good advice, and I believe Massad Ayoob gives that same advice.From what i know use whatever law enforcement uses. There's stuff like the g2 ripper round and the prosecutor will have a field day convicting you.