What is so bad about Honda Z1 ATF?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: daves66nova
Originally Posted By: adamg

From what I've seen, most problems in the past were linked to poorly built/engineered trannies rather than a bad fluid, since they were failing at a relatively low mileage. (Older Accords, [/quote
what this include 92 accords? I might have to sell mine.


I was talking about the early 2000s.
 
You can stop blowin smoke out of your [censored] now. All 5-speed manuals have three shafts huh? lmao! I guess my Prelude transmission came missing one from the factory.

Originally Posted By: JMHC
Originally Posted By: nthach
Honda is too arrogant to use a "proper" planetary gearset based auto tranny - they decided to base theirs off an regular 5 speed manual, replacing the synchros and most of the shifting mechanism with hydraulically-controlled clutches. A shift fork is used to shift between forward and reverse.


Too arrogant? You know, high end manufacturers like Mercedes are using this same design...automatically shifted manuals. That's how you can get these 7 speed transmissions. Ever try to get 7 gears out of a planetary gearset? Do you know that the automatically shifted manual is a lot lighter? It's a superior design if anything...

Now so why did they have failure issues? Well, when Honda came out with this design (derived from Indy cars, by the way) the transmissions shifted very sharply. This was great for the transmissions, but people complained. They were used to the typical slush box. So Honda incorporated these clutch packs that softened the engagement to please the average American car buyer. Well, they didn't get that right the first time. Then when they went to the 5-speed design, they added a third shaft just like all 5 speed manuals have over 4 speed 2-shaft designs. They missed the extra lubrication required, hence the Accord 03-04 failures cured by the extra trans fluid jet.

All of this obsession on here over Honda autos and how horrible Z1 fluid is clearly is total bogus. The clutch packs they used in the late 90's early 00's to make them smoother needed refinement, and the third shaft in '03 needed some lube. You can change your trans fluid every week, use Amsoil, whatever and it won't fix those problems. Just drain and fill with Z1 every 30K and it will be fine. If it fails, it wasn't due to the fluid.
 
Originally Posted By: JMHC


Too arrogant? You know, high end manufacturers like Mercedes are using this same design...automatically shifted manuals. That's how you can get these 7 speed transmissions. Ever try to get 7 gears out of a planetary gearset? Do you know that the automatically shifted manual is a lot lighter? It's a superior design if anything...

Now so why did they have failure issues? Well, when Honda came out with this design (derived from Indy cars, by the way) the transmissions shifted very sharply. This was great for the transmissions, but people complained. They were used to the typical slush box. So Honda incorporated these clutch packs that softened the engagement to please the average American car buyer. Well, they didn't get that right the first time. Then when they went to the 5-speed design, they added a third shaft just like all 5 speed manuals have over 4 speed 2-shaft designs. They missed the extra lubrication required, hence the Accord 03-04 failures cured by the extra trans fluid jet.

All of this obsession on here over Honda autos and how horrible Z1 fluid is clearly is total bogus. The clutch packs they used in the late 90's early 00's to make them smoother needed refinement, and the third shaft in '03 needed some lube. You can change your trans fluid every week, use Amsoil, whatever and it won't fix those problems. Just drain and fill with Z1 every 30K and it will be fine. If it fails, it wasn't due to the fluid.


IIRC it was Honda that didn't want to pay royalties to companies like Borg-Warner for a planetary based transmission design.

Honda's 5 and 6 speed manuals use two shafts. One mainshaft, and one countershaft. The countershaft drives the ring gear on the diff directly.

The '01-'03 5 speed autos had issues with clutch steel surface finish, as well as insufficient cooling, especially third gear. The '97-'99 models had issues with friction design and slippage during shifting tearing up the fluid.

7 speeds has been done for years with a planetary design, and ZF has an 8 speed unit out now.

Most manually shifted autos are planetary designs with electronic control over the valve body.

Some manufacturers have adopted hydraulic or electric actuators to shift conventional manual transmissions. Porsche, Ferrari, and the Toyota MR2 come to mind....

Honda 4 speed autos have three shafts too....

1997 to 1999 Acura 3.0 CL or 1998 to 2000 Accord:

0125081309b.jpg


The oil grooves are so large it leaves precious little friction area for a 200 hp+ engine.

0126081118a.jpg
 
What ironic is that their ATTS and SH-AWD systems use a planetrary design, but their automatic transmissions don't.

Jim Truett, do you post on honda-tech, registered 11-12-2003?
 
Originally Posted By: vinu_neuro
What ironic is that their ATTS and SH-AWD systems use a planetrary design, but their automatic transmissions don't.

Jim Truett, do you post on honda-tech, registered 11-12-2003?


Yes, that is me as well.

I'm sure that the ATTS and SH-AWD systems are planetary based simply due to space limitations.

ZF 8 Speed Planetary based automatic
 
Originally Posted By: Jim_Truett
{snip} 1997 to 1999 Acura 3.0 CL or 1998 to 2000 Accord: {snip}


that would be the '98-'02 Accord. They didn't change to 5-speed AT until '03 in the Accord.
 
ive used honda z1 in my T56 for the past 100k. always shifted great and still does at 132k. Felt alot better then when i had M1 tranny fluid in it I also will keep using it in my 06 civic. Only time will tell on how it holds up.
 
Originally Posted By: Firehawk409
ive used honda z1 in my T56 for the past 100k. always shifted great and still does at 132k. Felt alot better then when i had M1 tranny fluid in it I also will keep using it in my 06 civic. Only time will tell on how it holds up.


The temps in that T56 aren't anywhere near the temps in an auto trans.

I'm sure it's fine in a light 4 banger Civic. The heavier cars with the V6 is where it fails horribly.
 
Originally Posted By: Firehawk409
ya you are right. I guess i should have noted that. I was just stating my experience with it.


Does a manual transmission have more of a tendency to shear oil than an auto or is i the other way around? I would be interested in a UOA on the manual trans just to know what happens with Z1 in there.
 
Originally Posted By: benjamming
Originally Posted By: Jim_Truett
{snip} 1997 to 1999 Acura 3.0 CL or 1998 to 2000 Accord: {snip}


that would be the '98-'02 Accord. They didn't change to 5-speed AT until '03 in the Accord.



As the owner of an 01' Accord 4 cyl. I've done a lot of reading about their propensity for A/T failure. The main culprit is substandard 'carrier bearings' which fail causing 'scrapnel' which takes out the unit. I agree with the poster who stated that changing ATF every oil change won't make a difference.
I don't think Z-1 is a great fluid but I use it because Honda extended my warranty.
 
00 accord, I have been draining and refilling every 15k miles, with honda fluids
still going strong, slight slippage in 1st when cold. 190k miles. a system with afilter you better off changing out the fluid using a severe cycle.
on my duramax with ally with spin on trans filter and transynd oil, 50k miles with some filter change
 
Molakule, what type of Zinc does Z1 uses? is it a dissolved additives like zddp or is it solid particles that got plated on metal/friction material surfaces?

The only thing special about Z1 is this Zinc additives. You can use other ATF if you do not mind about the typical hard shifting property. I'm using Maxlife and it works fine for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom