What are the concerns of using a lighter oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
45
Location
Singapore
i'd like to know generally what are the fears associated with using light weight oils and if they are true?

Manufacturer specs for my engine:

5w30: below -30 to +10 deg C

10w30: -20 to +40 deg C

15w40: -15 to above +50 deg C

20w40: -10 to above +50 deg C


i suppose the temps are referring to ambient temps? i tink the room temp shld be abt 35deg max. im currently on RL 10W40, contemplating to change to GC or Amsoil ASL/ATM cos its 30% cheaper and i would like to extract every ounce of power available
 
As SargeGTO commented, reduction in viscosity also reduces the HTHS. As an example, most 5W-20 weight oils are in the 2.6 HTHS range while a 5w30 is 2.9/3.0 HTHS.

Some engines will have a lubrication area or components where the reduced HTHS of a 5W-20 removes the fim strength safety factor necessary for high loads or high temps.

This is why Ford, with all the back-specing of 5W-20 on many engines, still does not spec 5W-20 in the current 2007 model year 4.0L SOHC V6 engine.

Some engines, which are not designed for 20 weight oils, will be on the ragged edge of safety with the HTHS of a 5W-20.
 
I am sorry but I just cannot let this one go.

Film strength of some synthetic oils are hundreds or even thousands of times higher than of mineral based oils. Film strength has never been used as a characteristic of oil usefulness as it has no bearing on engine wear at all.

HTHS is a useful number for non-formulated oils but has not been shown to have any effects on engine wear and tear in fully formulated oils. Some of the oils with the least HTHS in the most powerful engines have shown the least wear.

I would like to see your reference as to why Ford is specifying one oil and not another.

Even though a 20 wt. oil at operating temperature has a film THICKNESS about 1/3 less than a 50 wt. oil it only makes a difference if the size of a dirt particle is larger than this distance. In practice there does not seem to be less wear in dirty engines with thicker oils.

aehaas
 
If HTHS is not an accurate measure, what is the ASTM test that measures film strength? Also, I have never viewed a HTHS number that was for base oils, only for full formulations.

BTW, we had a recent Bitog thread on Film Strength and I must have missed your comments on the superiority of synthetic oils. Note that I was one of the few members that argued an advantage for synthetics.

Current Ford Motor Company engine oil recommendations are located Here.
 
I have no problem with light oils in a PROPERLY FUNCTIONING engine. The question is what happens when something goes wrong, such as a leaky injector dumping fuel into the engine or an intake gasket failure.

In my opinion, 20-weight oils have ZERO safety margin.
 
Quote:


.... In practice there does not seem to be less wear in dirty engines with thicker oils.
aehaas




In diesel engines, as soot increases, wear increases. With thicker oils, that wear is less. You will see this especially in longer OCI's. The diesel engine UOA section and the tdiclub UOA collection is a good study and you will see the less wear with thicker oils, especially as OCI exceeds 10k.

The effect might be there with gasoline engines but many don't push their oil far enough to see it which is a good thing. Extended OCI crowd might see more wear with dirty thin oil vs dirty thick oil.

IMO, thicker oils protect better. But, my 3k OCI doesn't require it. My average
I do agree that 20wt doesn't provide any margin of safety if your fuel dilution spikes(short trippers, known pig rich vehicles, older leaky fuel injectors, tired sensors(map maf o2), excessive oil temps(turbo or known sludger), defective thermostat........if your vehicle has no oil temp control caused by marginal cooling, marginal sump capacity, low oil levels from consumption or negligence.....if your vehicle has marginal oil pressure or flow caused by oil varnish, sludge, questionable oil pump bypass spring, worn out tired oil pump, inadequate OEM oil flow or pressure.....if your vehicle has questionable cooling caused by small or clogged radiators, bad mech fan clutch or tired/undersized e-fan, weak/broken water pump, low coolant, improper ratios,....

Certain year Ford truck/suv 4.0, Lincoln 3.9, Villager 3.3, Zetec 2.0, any engine before 1993,... still use 5w30. Older FFV's get 10w30, while the rest get the 20wt. So, there is an issue with some applications that don't get lighter oils. I would think that temperature, PSI, flow, capacity, are the reasons why the 5w30 and 10w30's are being used.

Since I'm on an MPG hunt, I'm will be using thinner fluids once my mods are complete. I need to wire in fuel computer to bring back lean burn combustion(eliminate fuel dilution), remove the balance shafts(+10psi oil pressure and instant sump increase), improve filtration(bypass filter using surplus oil flow not feeding the balance shafts), improve oil temp control by using OEM wateroil heat exchanger,....until then my engine isn't going to see the 20wt.

AE, I understand that you have exotics. But the typical consumer vehicle isn't overengineered with surplus oil flow, pressure, cooling, sump capacity......that those exotic engines have. For example, I once drove a 3.3L Nissan Xterra(2+ ton vehicle) with a 3.5 quart oil sump, thimble filter, no oil cooling, engine worked 110% just to maintain barely reasonable performance, which ultimately caused oil consumption...... No way would I consider a 20wt in that vehicle. Synth oil provided some peace of mind knowing that oil wouldn't bake if a pint low. I also would think that the 40wt I used provided some additional film thickness, oil pressure, consumption control, and temp insurance. With a manual tranny, and aggressive driving, the crank and its thrust bearings, needed all the help they could get. The piston/ring/rod side loads are probably greater since the 3.3 is a stroker vg30e. I would think that a thin oil would've kill 'er quickly.

I find that too many 'common folk' vehicles are also underengineered. I won't blindly recommend moving to a thin oil. I do believe that there are many concerns for those that want to use thinner oils. Some of these concerns can be monitored with aftermarket oil filtration, aftermarket oil cooling, aftermarket accurate oil temp and oil pressure gauges, aftermarket higher volume and/or higher pressure oil pumps, improved water cooling via better waterpump and/or larger radiator, improve vehicle tuning via fuel computer of some sort(chip, EIFE, PMS),..........
 
offtopic.gif


Quote:


remove the balance shafts




Why on Earth would you want to remove the balance shafts? Do you enjoy a rough idle and overall rough operation? A vibrating steering wheel?
 
Last edited:
Reread my post. I'm on a search for the holy MPG!

The engine is smooth without the balance shafts. Must've been installed for the 'market segment'. I see no need for them since the engine had years/vehicles with it and without it. Plus, it weighs 20lbs, hogs 5-10psi of oil pressure, and eats HP/MPG. I will be using that oil flow/psi elsewhere.
The steering vehicle vibrates with balance shafts because the idle speed control valve doesn't work. I'll replace it at the same time of the shaft removal. Idle vibration gain should be nil since idle will bump back up where it should be. IACV only lasts a couple years. POS Toyota!!!!! Oh, am I not suppose to offend Toyota owners? Import vehicle owners do a good job hiding/masking common issues. Domestic vehicle issues tend to be front page news.
 
Isit ok if i replace the RL 10W40 of HTHS 4.7 with Schaeffer Supreme #9000 of HTHS 4.57 since it costs half the price?
can the Schaeffer take the beating?
 
“If HTHS is not an accurate measure, what is the ASTM test that measures film strength? Also, I have never viewed a HTHS number that was for base oils, only for full formulations.”
I do not know of any current research papers that tests fully formulated oils for HTHS as to wear characteristics. For all we know it may be that the lower the HTHS, the less wear in a passenger car engine.

“BTW, we had a recent Bitog thread on Film Strength and I must have missed your comments on the superiority of synthetic oils. Note that I was one of the few members that argued an advantage for synthetics.”
Higher film strength is not a reason why synthetic oils are somehow better than mineral based oils. I know of no papers that independently tests film strength against wear. Although it would seem that a higher film strength may decrease wear to a degree, I have not seen any papers to document this characteristic.

“Current Ford Motor Company engine oil recommendations are located HERE.”
I do not see WHY thicker oils were used here and I do not see any mention that thicker oils were needed BECAUSE they have a higher HTHS.

topcat78 - Do not choose an oil as if the HTHS is the only criteria of importance. If you read my articles you will see that other things are involved. There are dozens of additives that make up an oil formulation.

In order to answer your question of oil needs we need to know many things. How long (in time) is your average trip? Do you step on the gas a lot before the engine oils gets hot? It takes up to 30 minutes for oil to warm up to 200 F. Do you track your car? Are you driving steady on the highway or stop and go in town? What are your oil pressures and temperatures during your drive?

aehaas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom