Okay, Tempest. Thanks for having a VOA done on WeaponShield. Now what does all of this mean?
At least there are actual chemical additives in the product. I bet if tests were run on a lot of gun oils the results would find little if any chemical additives at all. But I don't like the 27-32% chloro parrifin. I would guess that is used as some sort of wear reducer but I would prefer if they used something else that would reduce wear. Surely there are other chemical additives that would provide antiwear/extreme pressure protection. The ZDDP is an antiwear product.
For as much money as they charge for these various gun oils why can't somebody develop a synthetic gun oil that has quality EP/AW additives? Such additives are developed for automotive use in motor oils, greases, and gear oils. Maybe because of the nature of guns it would be hard to develop such additives? I don't know. You tell me.
Like I have said before I really would prefer using oil on my guns rather than grease, but I am close to concluding that grease is the way to go. But if I could find an oil that would get the job done and be safe to use I would use that gun oil.
Now you have already done a lot of testing with WeaponShield. You said you fired a lot of rounds before putting new lubricate on the gun. So I guess we can conclude that WeaponShield works. Now can somebody tell me if that 27-32% chloro parrifin is safe or not both for the gun and me. Any chemists?