Why do people keep saying this. I've been using WD-40 and Walmart's version for years and no sticky residue or hard varnish.
I spray tools, hinges, other metal parts, etc. I will admit that WD-40 for tools needs to be reapplied more often than I like, but it does work.
Can people stop perpetuating this myth.
Wow, what a heated debate.
I am not so sure that this is completely a myth. Is is the WD-40 that causes "adverse" reactions or creates and "adverse" condition? I am not so sure of that.
In the past I have used Wd40 for many different things. I works very well as a cleaner, very well. I used to use it to clean off brake dust off wheels, of course in a nice a proper manner, not spraying it all over the wheels, but using a rag with WD applied to it. It works very well on guns, for cleaning carbon and whatever some use for sealing primers in some cases. It does for a limited time, stop skeaks in hinges and such, although there are better application for it.
As a profession plumber for 20 years, I do not use it for tools. If you use it to clean and lubricate copper cutters for example, it makes soldering copper tubing nearly impossible, as it will leave a thin coating of oil on the copper.
I think the "myth" has more to do with the conditions of part and its use or storage than anything else. It does "attract" dust. If it attracts dust, it must attract other things in the air like pollen and other nasties, which leads to a situation where contamination is the key factor in the "adverse condition".
Does WD40 suck? No, but it is likely used in many conditions where it is not optimal. It is not a good lube, more like a cutting oil. It works very nicely when machining aluminum.